Simple Woman for President Poll

Thanks.

 

Elizabeth Dole has an outstanding resume, I would choose Elizabeth Dole as a contender for the Presidency any day over Condi Rice.

 

Well, there are lots of women who are supervisors and managers nowadays, Bluefalcon. Welcome to the 21st century. Wake up and smell the coffee. Fortunately, views like yours that wrongly use God's Holy Word to keep women under men's thumbs in areas not addressed by the Bible are going the way of separate water fountains for whites and blacks.

 

Yeah, it is. People like you who want to keep women under your thumb in non-Biblically directed areas are fading away. After another generation there won't be hardly any of your kind left in this country - fortunately.

Mark me and mark me well, Bluefalcon. It's folks like you who are going to become next to nothing in numbers while women flourish more and more in the area of being CEOs, CFOs, etc.

 

Nope. If we both live long enough I will be proven right and you will be proven wrong.

 

You have that right, but you can't stop it.

 

You still haven't given any Biblical evidence as to why a woman cannot run a corporation or a country.

[ November 01, 2005, 03:35 AM: Message edited by: C4K ]

 

Sorry for butting in, Id first like to start by saying that I like Condi Rice she seems like a pretty level headed person. However it appears that some of you are a little backwards on authority, God gave authority to men in Gen 3:16 "Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth (in labor) children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and HE SHALL RULE OVER THEE." I know, I know "this verse is talking about husband and wife" however you fail to notice that if God would not give a woman authority over her own husband why would he give them it over the whole country's? seems a bit absurd doesnt it?. Also 1 Corinthians
14:34 Let your women keep silcence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but THEY ARE COMMANDED TO UNDER OBEDIENCE, " Not authority! obedience. That verse clearly states that woman is not to have authority over a man now I know what your going to say "that verse is talking about church" yes it was talking about church however theres is no scriptural support for the hypothesis that Paul limited his statments on obedience to just the church. Paul said women are not to speak in church (a plural word pertaining to a plural amount of men) because they are to be under obedience, not women are not to speak in church because they are to be under obedience in the church, the statement was general and every body here , (feminists included) knows it. Go ahead bombard me with your posts that seems to be a common tactic nowadays.

Your servant
Fishnbread

 

The White House is not the home or the church. Its that simple.

You cannot argrue from silence. Do you not think that if God intended the same rules to apply to the state as home and church He would have told us?

Why did he allow Deborah to be a judge in Isreal with full governing power?

There are no scriptural grounds for denying a woman the right to lead a corporation or a country. If there is, simply produce it and the argument will be over. It is not enough to say, "Well the Bible says a woman should not lead a church or home so surely it must mean she can't run a company or country." There is no support for such a stretch of scripture.

 

Did anyone here suggest male subjugation to the female? Subjugation by either sex is wrong.

God did institute the state and even set a woman up as judge to His people. Barak was subject to her authority when she told him to go up to war.

Personal note: I apologise for this part of my post.

It was unkind and unnecessary. Please forgive me. - C4K