Yes it is but it is also a fellowship of believers.
You forget.....I live in New Jersey. (Aka....SODOM II)
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes it is but it is also a fellowship of believers.
I think that the problem with large churches is the distance between the individual members. With large churches adopting a small-groups program, then the distance is placed between groups of members with the added aggravation of instituting a defacto hierarchy. The group leaders for all practical purposes become the pastors of the the small groups, under the authority of an earthly head.I agree 100%. How do you feel about large churches adopting a small-groups program?
And that cant be good!I think that the problem with large churches is the distance between the individual members. With large churches adopting a small-groups program, then the distance is placed between groups of members with the added aggravation of instituting a defacto hierarchy. The group leaders for all practical purposes become the pastors of the the small groups, under the authority of an earthly head.
I think that the problem with large churches is the distance between the individual members. With large churches adopting a small-groups program, then the distance is placed between groups of members with the added aggravation of instituting a defacto hierarchy. The group leaders for all practical purposes become the pastors of the the small groups, under the authority of an earthly head.
I can see how that could be a concern. It hasn't in my experience been the case, however I have only been a member of 4 large churches (to include the one I presently attend).
Your church isn't that large.I agree with you on that. Our small group leaders are just like anyone else and there's definitely no hierarchy other than deciding on where the meeting is next! We even often have the "leadership" of the group change up each week to give other people a chance to lead. It encourages and trains up new leaders in the church.
Your church isn't that large.
Multisite churches are the way to go, I believe. As I said in another thread, studies are showing it makes more spiritual and financial sense than building higher and wider at one site. It also keeps Christ as the focus, rather than the facilities, the pastor, and the "products" available: programs, Bible studies, exercise groups, etc.In this area, it is in the upper range of size. I think there are just a couple of churches larger than us.
But I agree that it's not thousands - AND we've started two other campuses (very similar to stand alone churches except we share staff and budget).![]()
Over the years, I have spoken to pastors of small churches. Some seem content that their church remains small.
Is this Godly thinking?
If we are truly seeking and serving the Lord, will we not see increase?
I don't know about anybody else, but I've never had any experience with a church that small. Even the little bitty Methodist-church-but-mostly-Baptist-membership we went to when I was growing up on a north Missouri farm had more people than that attending regularly.I suppose "small" is a variable term.
So for continued discussion on this thread - we will consider a small church as being under an average attendence of 35.
I don't know about anybody else, but I've never had any experience with a church that small. Even the little bitty Methodist-church-but-mostly-Baptist-membership we went to when I was growing up on a north Missouri farm had more people than that attending regularly.