Snopes Defends Liar Who Accused White Cops Of Racism

[Zaac]

That cat needs to be put on a diet.

It's like a zombie cat, and it's eating his brain!!!

 

[777]

RevMitchell or 777, please point out what this woman lied about and also why the Snopes article is inaccurate.

What she lied about? The sirens, the flashing lights, the racial profiling for starters - never happened:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/11/0...exas-profs-claim-racial-profiling-says-chief/


this was her race-baiting op/ed:

http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/l...hy-bland-i-was-caught-walking-while-black.ece

and here is snopes, being as disingenuous and partisan as they always are:

UNT Journalism dean Dorothy Bland wrote a controversial editorial claiming she was racially profiled in Corinth, Texas, an account which largely matched what a police dash cam recorded.

Claim: Dorothy Bland, dean of the Mayborn School of Journalism at the University of North Texas, fabricated a story about police officers in Corinth, Texas.

Verdict: Mostly False

the Soros operatives twist that into: "well, she was stopped by the police, so Dorothy is telling the truth". That's what you call a half-lie, a sin of omission. There is no evidence saying she was racially profiled. Just another strawman from snopes, they are the same people that were told they used zebras for Mr. Ed on that old tv show, and they were gullible enough to believe them. They've scrubbed the story since.

Another example that is still on the site : Did Hillary Clinton really represent the Black Panthers in a case years ago? Their answer: No, she did represent the Black Panthers in a case years ago, but it's mostly false because she wasn't a Black Panther.

 

[Revmitchell]

The idea that having been profiled is subjective is absurd. Its like being pregnant. Either you or you aren't. Just because she wants it to be true does not make it true. Only a liberal would think ups something so stupid.

 

[InTheLight]

What she lied about? The sirens, the flashing lights, the racial profiling for starters - never happened:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/11/0...exas-profs-claim-racial-profiling-says-chief/


this was her race-baiting op/ed:

http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/l...hy-bland-i-was-caught-walking-while-black.ece

and here is snopes, being as disingenuous and partisan as they always are:



the Soros operatives twist that into: "well, she was stopped by the police, so Dorothy is telling the truth".

She opined that she was stopped for being black in a white neighborhood. She was a black woman in a predominantly white neighborhood and she WAS stopped by police. Having an opinion is not a lie. The police said she was "blocking traffic". Watch the video. What traffic is she blocking?

 

[InTheLight]

The idea that having been profiled is subjective is absurd. Its like being pregnant. Either you or you aren't. Just because she wants it to be true does not make it true. Only a liberal would think ups something so stupid.

AHA, that is the crux of the matter. She wanted it to be true. Does that mean it was a lie? Unknown.
Was she blocking traffic? Clearly we can see via the video she wasn't blocking traffic. That is evidence that we can see. The cops are clearly lying about her blocking traffic. So if she wasn't stopped for blocking traffic, why was she stopped?

 

[777]

Did you bother reading the police response?:

My officers, a field training officer and his recruit, observed Ms. Bland walking in the roadway wearing earbuds and unaware that there was a pickup truck directly behind her that had to almost come to a complete stop to avoid hitting her.

The driver of the truck looked at the officers as they passed and held his hands in the air, which implied “aren’t you going to do something about this?” The officers turned around and drove behind Ms. Bland.

They activated their in-car video camera, which shows her again walking in the roadway impeding traffic.

That IS impeding traffic. There was a sidewalk on both sides of the street but she walks down the middle of the road while wearing headphones. That is dangerous, she could have been run over.

Yet she tries to claim she was arrested (never was) for walking in a "white" neighborhood, her own neighborhood. The police had seen her before but that's not when she was walking in the middle of the street unable to hear outside noise. Some "profiling", sheesh.

 

[Revmitchell]

AHA, that is the crux of the matter. She wanted it to be true. Does that mean it was a lie? Unknown.
Was she blocking traffic? Clearly we can see via the video she wasn't blocking traffic. That is evidence that we can see. The cops are clearly lying about her blocking traffic. So if she wasn't stopped for blocking traffic, why was she stopped?

And there is that famous innuendo of yours.

 

[InTheLight]

And there is that famous innuendo of yours.

Please quote my post with the innuendo in it and then underline the relevant part.

 

[InTheLight]

Did you bother reading the police response?

Watch the video. Use your own eyes and see the evidence for yourself.