This video format is similar to the "Screwtape Letters", except instead of the wiring being from a demon to an upper demon it's from a Christian Pastor to a supposed random young man.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I don't think he actively tries to not be stereotypical. In fact, he would likely try to be stereotypical.3. [IMPLIED] Women only read and write Hallmark books/movies and could and would never enjoy a book or movie that a man would enjoy, ergo, that proves that all the time it's a woman's fault and it's a woman's fault all the time.
I understand that men and women are different. But also, I hate Hallmark books and movies. I LOVE Call of the Wild, C.S. Lewis, the Avengers, and more.
I do love Jane Austen, as her novels are more DEEP critiques of the idiotic social mores of the day - written for the highly intelligent woman. I hate other romance novels as they mostly include a woman unwillingly marrying her rapist [but we are supposed to pretend it wasn't] and that marriage of convenience throughout the book supposedly turning into love. Pretty sick stuff. Most women I know abhor this stuff.
He, in his attempt to NOT be stereotypical, cast women in a terrible stereotypical light. I am not that woman at all.
1. It may be hurtful, but also true. This should be something every man should look for, and this is one of the attributes that I tell younger men to look for. A woman should feed her husband and family, and not be offended by it.I got three things out of this [well, I'll just list three] that were cringe worthy to me and a little hurtful. [You DID say that this was supposed to be a pastor talking to a young man.]
So here is what the young man is supposed to learn about women.
1. "The Apostle Paul wants the women to make the sandwiches."
2. "Part of our general sexual DOWNGRADE has been the result of WOMEN, even Christian women, thinking that men have a responsibility to be oriented to the relationship the same way the women are."
---- It may not have been clear in the video, but Orientation here is addressing the God-Given Adam vs Eve Dichotomy. He is referencing that Adam was created to be the gardener. Eve was created to help the gardener.
In other words, men are oriented by God to be mission minded as each man is given a mission. A wife is given to a man to be his helper in that mission. A man's mission may be to be a Missionary in a foreign country, to farm, to woodwork, etc. Whatever it may be, it is her duty to assist her husband in that mission.
Thus modern women expecting things to be relationship oriented are in for a surprise when they find out that man is mission oriented, and therefore this has caused a sex roles downgrade. This is an aspect of "Biblical/Christian Patriarchy", which is likely foreign to mainstream "Complementarianism".[/QUO
All of the above is most certainly screwed in modern societal thinking!!
All this straight-from-hell garbage regarding sex (sex per se`, queers, bi's, trans etc.) that has prevailed politically & socially is nothing more than satan's way of trying to totally eliminate the "God given plan" from working! I must say he has done a pretty effective job thus far, especially with so many WILLING participants in his strategy!!
I've never heard anybody except this guy argue that an androgynous lifestyle for all is the objective of "the liberals." Can anyone provide examples?This video format is similar to the "Screwtape Letters", except instead of the wiring being from a demon to an upper demon it's from a Christian Pastor to a supposed random young man.
The bottom line on this often-quoted passage is both husbands and wives should treat their mate with respect and Christian love as Jesus exhorts us all to do with anyone.
No, the bottom line is that husbands are to be treated with respect by the wife submitting to her husband in all things.[1Pe 3:1-9 NASB95] 1 In the same way, you wives, be submissive to your own husbands so that even if any [of them] are disobedient to the word, they may be won without a word by the behavior of their wives, 2 as they observe your chaste and respectful behavior. 3 Your adornment must not be [merely] external--braiding the hair, and wearing gold jewelry, or putting on dresses; 4 but [let it be] the hidden person of the heart, with the imperishable quality of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is precious in the sight of God. 5 For in this way in former times the holy women also, who hoped in God, used to adorn themselves, being submissive to their own husbands; 6 just as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord, and you have become her children if you do what is right without being frightened by any fear. 7 You husbands in the same way, live with [your wives] in an understanding way, as with someone weaker, since she is a woman; and show her honor as a fellow heir of the grace of life, so that your prayers will not be hindered. 8 To sum up, all of you be harmonious, sympathetic, brotherly, kindhearted, and humble in spirit; 9 not returning evil for evil or insult for insult, but giving a blessing instead; for you were called for the very purpose that you might inherit a blessing.
The bottom line on this often-quoted passage is both husbands and wives should treat their mate with respect and Christian love as Jesus exhorts us all to do with anyone.
Sure, let's look at our world for 1/10th of a second.I've never heard anybody except this guy argue that an androgynous lifestyle for all is the objective of "the liberals." Can anyone provide examples?
And husbands are to treat their wives the way a weaker and more fragile vessel is to be treated, with love NOT respect. You don't treat a wife like you do your male friends.
Let up on the politics. Yes, there are differences between men and women. Should these be used to prevent women from using their tallents for the Lord as you argue? Should they be used to subgegate women and " put them in their place? " No. Jesus worked with women in a much more egalitarian way than was the custom in His time. I'll stand on Paul's statement about equality in the Kingdom. You can stand with this whathisname.Sure, let's look at our world for 1/10th of a second.
Godly Masculinity is attacked by Liberals as Toxic Masculinity while Females are encouraged to be more masculine through Feminism.
"It's Good to Be a Man" is a good book to read for more on this topic as is this Sermon by Michael Foster. Begins at 2:30
Strange that you ask for examples of modern day androgyny in a political forum then get upset when I give you some. Hmm...Let up on the politics.
Quote where anyone said that please. Straw man.Yes, there are differences between men and women. Should these be used to prevent women from using their tallents for the Lord as you argue?
Are you aware that God's Word necessarily subjugates everyone to His will? You are God's footstool. You are subjugated as am I, as are all women.Should they be used to subgegate women and " put them in their place? " No.
0 bearing on this conversation. We are talking about what God's Word says, not cultural norms in different times. The way Jesus interacted with women would be considered "Misogyny" by Feminists nowadays.Jesus worked with women in a much more egalitarian way than was the custom in His time.
Great, you stand on Paul's one verse and I will stand on the entirety of the rest of scripture in its proper context.I'll stand on Paul's statement about equality in the Kingdom. You can stand with this whathisname.
Godly Masculinity is attacked by Liberals as Toxic Masculinity while Females are encouraged to be more masculine through Feminism.
No. Jesus worked with women in a much more egalitarian way than was the custom in His time. I'll stand on Paul's statement about equality in the Kingdom. You can stand with this whathisname.