Originally posted by Istherenotacause:
>>Yall quit making me out to be "KJVO"! Everyone of you except
>>1 or 2 have alluded to me being KJVO. I AM NOT!
This is the perception you give, and in cyberspace, perception is reality.....
>>Tyndale was good, Wycliffe too! Geneva was pretty accurate,
>>the King James 1611 Authorized Version is B E S T !!!!
Tyndale and Wyclif are "good?"
The Geneva is "pretty accurate?"
Indeed they are, and more.
How is the Authorized Version the "BEST" (in your words)? Have you ever noticed that the New Testament in the AV is very similar to the Tyndale that predates it by almost eighty years?
I would contend that the Wiclif Translation is the best, followed by the Geneva, Tyndale, then the AV.
>>I already have the Word of God in the King James Bible!!
Well, do you have the real Authorised Version, or do you have one of the revisions? I have the Word of God in my copies of the AV, Wiclif, Tyndale, Luther, Geneva, and ESV, along with the NKJV. [Note that this is my personal opinion, not a Statement of Doctrine.]
>>I'll admit, if this will "help" any of you; "KJVO" is a "label" that mv
>>advocates use as a detriment to those who stand for the
>>KJB/AV1611.
Is this a joke? Not only is KJV-Onlyism a self-imposed label, in some cases it is worn with pride. I used to travel extensively in my job. I have seen congregations that have "King James Only" on the signs in front of their churches. I have yet to see any church with "NIV Only" or "NASB Only" on their signs.
>>I have yet to see ANYONE say that the KJB is the ONLY Word of
>>God, that ludicrous statement would make even the Originals out.
Yes you have. Simply go to google.com and one can find numerous people who believe this. Now you are merely baiting us.
Notwithstanding that, I would agree with you that it is indeed a ludicrous statement.