The fact that Preterism is tendentious is not really a mark against it. It is neither here nor there. Reform theology as well incipient as Christianity were also once viewed the same way.It is not true preterism, and certainly not Biblical.
What a tendetious post! As if Abraham, Isaac and Jacob turned into apes or elephants when they died!
Mankind is both spiritual and physical (Eccl. 12:7). The risen Lord Jesus was also both spiritual and physical (Luke 24:39-43). When He returns, He will also be both spiritual and physical (Acts 1:11). Since He is the firstborn from the dead (Col. 1:18; Rev. 1:5), I think we may take it that when we rise at the end of the age, we shall also be both spiritual and physical, though not as we were ( 1 Cor. 15:50-54).
I care nothing for what a secular site like Wikipaedia may posit.
The fact that you resort to silly retorts ("turned into apes or elephants") rather than answer the simple yes or no question is an answer in itself. It reveals an emotional knee-jerk antipathy to anything that challenges your doctrinaire bubble. You refuse to even consider why those questions are important. Instead, shields go up.
Once again, just answer the questions sans insults.
Or just leave the thread for those who are willing.
Last edited: