Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I'm not talking about what you or anyone else thinks, this is what I think will happen.
BTW, if Hillary Clinton is nominated as president, I plan to vote for her.
rs -
Do you think that Clintion lied about Benghaz?
rs -
Do you think that Clintion lied about Benghaz?
WHY?It's probably wise to have a lawyer in cases like this. Besides, I'm certain there are confidentiality agreements in place preventing them from speaking to the media.
They were there during the fight. They know something or Obama would not be hiding them. If they are not careful they may disappear for good.They were lower level diplomatic aides that probably didn't know much to begin with.
And I believe Congress has access to transcripts of the interrogations if they wanted to see it. Why hold a public hearing so our enemies can get inside info on how our diplomatic outposts operate?
Drone.I believe your mistake here is assuming that the majority of Americans are interested in pursing Benghazi.
They were there during the fight. They know something or Obama would not be hiding them. If they are not careful they may disappear for good.
Apparently Congress does not have access to any info from the survivors. Why they have not issued subpoenas I do not understand.
You cannot know whether or not Congress has information access or not. I say it is likely that the chairs of the intelligence committees have seen this information and don't deem it worthy of a public subpeona.
Pure speculation. Certainly you dont operate off of speculation do you?
Yes, the phrase "it is likely" denotes speculation on my part. Brilliant reading comprehension skills, there.
"Obama is hiding witnesses" is a statement of fact, with no proof. More likely they are under confidentiality agreements related to state secrets.
As to the hospital patients name being changed I would guess (see, that's speculation right there) that it was done for his own protection.
Protection from whom?
Terrorists, reporters, whatever...
Drone.
Correction. The press isn't interested. Let them start touting it, and the interest of a majority of Americans will immediately manifest.
That is a cop out!
you've just said that the majority don't care because they're ignorant of the facts and that's okay with you.But they won't so the majority don't. Good enough for me. You just have sour grapes because the American people have rejected your ignorant positions.
But they won't so the majority don't. Good enough for me. You just have sour grapes because the American people have rejected your ignorant positions.
Your 2nd sentence is an abomination!
If I understand what you are saying, it is that the MSM will not tell the facts to the public, so the public will never KNOW that there is some ethical/legal/moral problem with Bengazi AND YOU ARE OK WITH THAT LACK OF KNOWLEDGE?
Look RS, I know our political views are roughly 180 degrees apart, but your comment tells me that this subversive attitude of this administration is fine with you simply because the public does not know how devious it is?????:BangHead:
Please tell me I'm wrong!!!
"Oldtimer" ???
I think he's saying you're a breath of fresh air...like air freshener.:laugh:
...either that or your stale.:smilewinkgrin: