• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

"Son of God"

Y

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
OldRegular said:
You are wrong on both counts. It is not begging the question. That response is commonly used on this forum when people are unable to give a logical response. It is a fact, supported by the Scripture that declares Him, that God is Holy and is due reverence from all, especially from those He has redeemed.

As for that other fancy phrase, a non sequitur, which means:
1. Logic. an inference or a conclusion that does not follow from the premises.
2. a statement containing an illogical conclusion.

You are still wrong, unless you are saying that it is illogical to give Holy God the reverence He demands and is due from those who are His! And if so you are still wrong!
Click to expand...

did the passion not give Jesus his due, for being the suffering servant of Yahweh though?
 
O

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Yeshua1 said:
did the passion not give Jesus his due, for being the suffering servant of Yahweh though?
Click to expand...

Sinful man should not "IMITATE" the sugffering of the one without sin. It is blasphemous! How in the world could you and I have any concept of the suffering Jesus Christ endured.
 
Y

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
OldRegular said:
Sinful man should not "IMITATE" the sugffering of the one without sin. It is blasphemous! How in the world could you and I have any concept of the suffering Jesus Christ endured.
Click to expand...

Was the intent to glorify Jesus by the movie, or to mock and ridicule Him? that is what God judges by!
 
D

drfuss

New Member
I saw the movie last week. There were some things different from scripture. The two main differences that jumped out at me was: when Jesus ascended, there were only eleven people there and one was a woman; John was the narrator saying that the church grew under the leadership of Peter and Mary. No mention was made about Paul. The leadership of Mary sounded very Roman Catholic to me.
 
O

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Yeshua1 said:
Was the intent to glorify Jesus by the movie, or to mock and ridicule Him? that is what God judges by!
Click to expand...

I suspect the intent of the movie is to make money! That is generally the purpose of movies. It is obvious you do not think it is wrong for sinful man to imitate the suffering of Jesus Christ~
 
O

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
drfuss said:
I saw the movie last week. There were some things different from scripture. The two main differences that jumped out at me was: when Jesus ascended, there were only eleven people there and one was a woman; John was the narrator saying that the church grew under the leadership of Peter and Mary. No mention was made about Paul. The leadership of Mary sounded very Roman Catholic to me.
Click to expand...

The Roman Catholic religion, in particular the priesthood, is simply an updated version of Judaism.
 
B

blackbird

Active Member
drfuss said:
I saw the movie last week. There were some things different from scripture. The two main differences that jumped out at me was: when Jesus ascended, there were only eleven people there and one was a woman; John was the narrator saying that the church grew under the leadership of Peter and Mary. No mention was made about Paul. The leadership of Mary sounded very Roman Catholic to me.
Click to expand...

It doesn't take a Rocket Scientist long to figure out . . . .!!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top