I'll give a fairly even handed run down of the major SBC seminaries for you. Please feel free to interact. Also, as a caveat, I am an alumnus of SWBTS (which will be surprising given my comments.)
Can anyone give me basic overviews of Southern, Southeastern, and Southwestern seminaries?
Southern (SB,) located in Louisville is the oldest of the SBC seminaries.
Southwestern (SW,) located in Ft Worth is the second oldest.
Southeastern (SE,) located on the old campus of Wake Forest University is one of the younger seminaries.
My initial thoughts about all three are:
SB - this is, right now, the strongest SBC seminary. The leadership of the school has really assembled a strong faculty and it is producing some great work. If I were to recommend any of the three seminaries, I'd recommend Southern.
SE - is rising quickly and is assembling some of the best faculty at an evangelical seminary. Some, particularly around here, would place it alongside SB, but I don't think that is the case. Both are strong schools, but SB has a better faculty, resources, and vision.
SW - used to be the largest seminary in N America, but it is continuing to decline. They have a good faculty but only a few significant theologians. A lot of this has to do with the current leadership who are intent on turning the school into some kind of fundamentalist institution than a more reasonable voice.
notafan said:
Theology (more/less reformed), Focus (I've heard Southern focuses on theology, Southeastern on the Great Commission, etc), Notable professors, Atmosphere (chapel services, campus, etc), the seminary's President, etc..
All the seminaries are focused on training and equipping individuals for ministry. All three seek to do this using a biblical method.
SB - is particularly focused on theological studies and is really producing some great ministers. If you're looking for a more theological degree that is focused on academic studies SB is a good institution. In terms of campus and community life, I don't know of many institutions that can keep up with SB. The campus is simply amazing. Dr Mohler, the President, is well renowned and has developed not only a lasting vision but assembled to proper people around him to facilitate accomplishing that vision.
SE - is focused on ministry and missions more than any other seminary I know of in the SBC. They are constantly talking mission and putting praxis to the theory in the classrooms. The campus is a good one, particularly that it is growing and exists in the fine buildings that made up the old Wake Forest campus. The Raleigh-Durham community is pretty wonderful as a crossroads of ministry and culture. Dr Akin is a good president who has helped the seminary turn the corner and move forward in his tenure.
SW - is focused on ministry and preaching. Probably better than the other seminaries, their preaching studies really bring together a lot of what is talked about in the classroom. They view this as the ultimate goal of ministry. The campus is very nice (I spent 3 years there) and the library is rather good. Dr Patterson is an interesting character who came to the school in an intriguing transition from the previous administration. I'll leave my thoughts here.
notafan said:
Things like Cost I can find on the schools' websites, but it is harder to find some other things that are important.
If you go and download the academic handbook or seminary catalog these details will be disclosed. When talking with an admissions person they should be willing to provide this info upfront. If not, they're not good at what they do.
In general, if I was planning on going to seminary, and charting the same course of pastoral ministry that I'm in now, I would start at Southern and then consider other, non-SBC seminaries like DTS, TEDS, or PTS. If I had to stay in the SBC (and why not, the cost is a third of the rest of these schools) Southern would be hands down my first, and almost only, alternative.
Southwestern (this isn't a rant) is just in a bad place. They aren't growing in their student population and the whole place is stuck in some kind of intellectual torpor. It isn't what it used to be. I can't recommend it for most students.
I hope this helps.