First off, oneness, that was a rather childish challenge I issued you--and yet, you responded. I had hoped that you would see it for the schoolyard "dare" it was....
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>YOu can call it gibbersh, but Paul said it was an unknown tongue and he said "I would that you all spake in tongues" "Forbid not to speak in tongues" "One that speaks in an unknown tongue speaks not to himself, but UNTO GOD"<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
And one who doesn't recognize the way tongues are used by the Oneness Pentecostal and other sects today as "gibberish" is denying the Scripture. Scripture, and therefore God, clearly tells us what the gift was and how it was used.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>I wish you guys would study up on the corinthian Church and find out why Paul wrote the letter to them. He did not write them to tell them to stop speaking in tongues. He wrote them to tell them to get a little bit of order about themselves.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
"A little bit"? Fornication, revelry to the point of desecrating the Lord's Supper, emphasis of gifts of the spirit (including, and especially tongues) over love--I'd say that you just epitomized the gift of understatement.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>I dont know what language I speak when i speak in an unknown tongue. That is why it is called an unknown tongue.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
So am I to assume that you didn't ask your interpreter what language it was? Or did you only speak by/to yourself? In which case, if you were in church, did you ensure that you were silent, so as to not disrupt the rest of the congregation?
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Why can one not speak in tongues and magnify god? They spoke in an unknown tongue. They magnified God. Where is there a problem. Can they not do both?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Boy howdy, talk about avoiding the question. How did the people present know they were magnifying God if they were speaking in a tongue no one present could understand? THAT'S the problem, and if you can't see it, then you've put blinders on yourself, my friend.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>HMMMMMM.... IS PAUL SAYING THAT THE ONE SPEAKING IN TONGUES MAY BE ABLE TO INTERPRET? MAYBE SO....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
2 things: 1) You don't have to "shout" (use all caps); we can read just fine. If you have to raise your voice instead of reinforcing your point, then there's something wrong with your point.
2) Let me see...it's an unknown language, but I can interpret, so suddenly it's not unknown...my head is now spinning....
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>HE SAID IF HE PRAYS IN AN UNKNOWN TONGUE HIS SPIRIT IS PRAYING, BUT THE UNDERSTANDING IS UNFRUITFUL.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
He (Paul) also said: "I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in a tongue."
He (Paul) also said: "Tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not." (emphasis mine)
If you're a believer, oneness, what do you need tongues for?
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>YOu can call it gibbersh, but Paul said it was an unknown tongue and he said "I would that you all spake in tongues" "Forbid not to speak in tongues" "One that speaks in an unknown tongue speaks not to himself, but UNTO GOD"<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
And one who doesn't recognize the way tongues are used by the Oneness Pentecostal and other sects today as "gibberish" is denying the Scripture. Scripture, and therefore God, clearly tells us what the gift was and how it was used.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>I wish you guys would study up on the corinthian Church and find out why Paul wrote the letter to them. He did not write them to tell them to stop speaking in tongues. He wrote them to tell them to get a little bit of order about themselves.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
"A little bit"? Fornication, revelry to the point of desecrating the Lord's Supper, emphasis of gifts of the spirit (including, and especially tongues) over love--I'd say that you just epitomized the gift of understatement.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>I dont know what language I speak when i speak in an unknown tongue. That is why it is called an unknown tongue.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
So am I to assume that you didn't ask your interpreter what language it was? Or did you only speak by/to yourself? In which case, if you were in church, did you ensure that you were silent, so as to not disrupt the rest of the congregation?
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Why can one not speak in tongues and magnify god? They spoke in an unknown tongue. They magnified God. Where is there a problem. Can they not do both?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Boy howdy, talk about avoiding the question. How did the people present know they were magnifying God if they were speaking in a tongue no one present could understand? THAT'S the problem, and if you can't see it, then you've put blinders on yourself, my friend.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>HMMMMMM.... IS PAUL SAYING THAT THE ONE SPEAKING IN TONGUES MAY BE ABLE TO INTERPRET? MAYBE SO....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
2 things: 1) You don't have to "shout" (use all caps); we can read just fine. If you have to raise your voice instead of reinforcing your point, then there's something wrong with your point.
2) Let me see...it's an unknown language, but I can interpret, so suddenly it's not unknown...my head is now spinning....
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>HE SAID IF HE PRAYS IN AN UNKNOWN TONGUE HIS SPIRIT IS PRAYING, BUT THE UNDERSTANDING IS UNFRUITFUL.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
He (Paul) also said: "I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in a tongue."
He (Paul) also said: "Tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not." (emphasis mine)
If you're a believer, oneness, what do you need tongues for?