Open the Bible and read. Do you want me to quote all of chapter 3 and 4?
It is not “nothing but lies” that all Galatians 3 and 4 is about faith or observance of the law. The Galatians were turning to observing the law.
You say Paul would not have been so disappointed in them if they were observing the law.
Galatians 2
Paul Opposes Peter
11 When Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong. 12 Before certain men came from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles. But when they arrived, he began to draw back and separate himself from the Gentiles because he was afraid of those who belonged to the circumcision group. 13 The other Jews joined him in his hypocrisy, so that by their hypocrisy even Barnabas was led astray.
14 When I saw that they were not acting in line with the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter in front of them all, “You are a Jew, yet you live like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs?
15 “We who are Jews by birth and not ‘Gentile sinners’ 16 know that a man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the law, because by observing the law no one will be justified.
Because they were recently receiving knowledge of the Law and you cannot expect they cannot be taught anything.
Galatians were turning back to the same “principles,” by observing special days…
GE:
You repeat and repeat.
About:
"Open the Bible and read. Do you want me to quote all of chapter 3 and 4?"
No, just show the things you claimed is written. They are NOT written. So you try to get out of your predicament with this silly answer.
The things you claimed are written, are these:
“The Galatians were turning to observing the law.”
“The people who were trying to win the Galatians over were Jews.”
“The Jews convinced the Galatians to be under the law.”
Don’t just say that; quote that!
You can’t.
You not only just repeat; you repeatedly IGNORE any answers given against you.
You ignore – again, here – that the apostles made peace and further acted in harmony. You only ‘quote’ the part BEFORE where they agreed, as if the rest of Galatians reflects a continuation of the discord that existed at first and as if that discord was about the Law.
You carefully ignore the things the apostles, Paul and the Jews initially disagreed on, “the truth of the Gospel” or ‘justification by faith’.
You also ignore justification became an issue only because of the bad human relations and social behaviour of the Jews; not because of any doctrine of any party.
You ignore the real drama turned about the bad role models the apostles and other Jews from Jerusalem were. No Galatians became influenced; they witnessed the whole affair between the apostles with disdain I think.
You ignore circumcision or the Law did not cause dissension, but you only falsely, claim that it did.
You ignore there was NO disagreement between the apostles or between Paul and the Galatians over ‘the Law’ or circumcision, anywhere in 'all Galatians'!
I pointed it all out before, but you just ignore and repeat your own stories instead.
About:
“You say Paul would not have been so disappointed in them if they were observing the law.”
Yes! And do you say, Paul would have been so happy with them if they were not observing the Law?!
About:
“all Galatians 3 and 4 is about faith or observance of the law. The Galatians were turning to observing the law.”
No! All Galatians 3 and 4 are about, is FAITH and JUSTIFICATION that is not, through observance of the law, but by faith and the grace of God.
And all that Galatians 4:8-10 are about is the former Galatian pagans who rejected the Gospel of Jesus Christ and justification by faith through the grace of God, and were turning back to – quote: “superstitiously observe weak and beggarly elemental no gods, days, months, seasons, years” end quote— NOT THE LAW!
You directly CONTRADICT everything Paul says!
About:
“Galatians were turning back to the same “principles,” [viz. my words, “knowledge of the Law”] by observing special days”
… contradicting not only me, but also everything Paul anywhere in Galatians says by precisely identifying ‘knowledge of the Law”, and the Galatians’ “observing special days”! Horrible!
In the end, it is clear your real mistake is that you cannot or do not or will not distinguish things that are distinguished, but identify them to suit your own warped ideas.