• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Spiritual Interpretation....pt6

Status
Not open for further replies.

PrmtvBptst1832

Active Member
Site Supporter

PrmtvBptst1832

Active Member
Site Supporter
The idea being taken from the language....who was supposed to be the wife?
was it Jerusalem or the pagan nations...? That is why the idea of jealously that Kyred offers is biblical.
Revelation discusses two women...Israel, the Church...one a harlot, one a bride.

Which language does not have to be Jerusalem as I demonstrated.
 

PrmtvBptst1832

Active Member
Site Supporter
Thanks for asking serious questions supported by Scripture.


He rebuked Cleopas & companion:
Luke 24:25 Then He said to them, “O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! 26 Ought not the Christ to have suffered these things and to enter into His glory?” 27 And beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, He expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself.
and the Apostles:
44 Then He said to them, “These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms concerning Me.” 45 And He opened their understanding, that they might comprehend the Scriptures.

46 Then He said to them, “Thus it is written, and thus it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day, 47 and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. 48 And you are witnesses of these things. 49 Behold, I send the Promise of My Father upon you; but tarry in the city of Jerusalem until you are endued with power from on high.”

Did he give them any reason to believe he would establish an earthly kingdom? NO! They were very slow to understand as the expectation of an Israelite kingdom centred on Jerusalem was so ingrained that they just could not understand.


Let the wonder of the opening verses of Ephesians sink in:
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, 4 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love, 5 having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, 6 to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He made us accepted in the Beloved.
The wonder of the relationship of the redeemed people of God with their God & Saviour - & each other in Christ.


I don't get your comment in red. Jesus told her: "Ye know not what ye ask."
They were confused, & they refused to believe his repeated plain statements of betrayal, rejection, crucifixion & resurrection.


Peter explains the other nation as the multinational church. 1 Peter 2.


Now you are being silly. THey were indeed members of Jesus' kingdom -
Rev. 1:5b To Him who loved us and washed us from our sins in His own blood, 6 and has made us kings and priests to His God and Father, to Him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.

The Apostles certainly judged Israel in Acts 4, so the guilty leaders had nothing to answer.

Stephen judged his accusers. (Acts 7) Paul even judged his hearers before they rejected him & his message.
Acts 13:40 Beware therefore, lest what has been spoken in the prophets come upon you:
41 ‘Behold, you despisers,
Marvel and perish!
For I work a work in your days,
A work which you will by no means believe,
Though one were to declare it to you.’
And the chief priests:
Acts 23:3 Then Paul said to him, “God will strike you, you whitewashed wall! For you sit to judge me according to the law, and do you command me to be struck contrary to the law?”


Zacharias is quoting OT prophecy. There is a lot more teaching about Jesus to come.



Times of refreshing did come, & were evident during the Apostolic period. He can't mean that if all the Jews repented, God would send Jesus as an earthly king, because in the same sentence Jesus will stay in heaven until the times of restoration of all things. His coming at the passing away of heaven & earth. (Mat. 24:35, 2 Peter 3.)

At the time of Acts 3, the Jews' leaders had not rejected the Apostolic Gospel, though they were about to.

What do YOU think the Holy Spirit meant by Peter's statement in Acts 3:19-21?

What do you think Jesus meant by these comings?
John 14:3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also. 4 And where I go you know, and the way you know.”

18 I will not leave you orphans; I will come to you.

23 Jesus answered and said to him, “If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him.

28 You have heard Me say to you, ‘I am going away and coming back to you.’ If you loved Me, you would rejoice because I said, ‘I am going to the Father,’ for My Father is greater than I.

In Acts 3.19-21, was Peter still slow?

Luke 24:25 has nothing to do with the establishment of the kingdom.

You are failing to address the part about the kingdom in James' and John's mother's request.

Zacharias was full of the Holy Ghost when he prophesied.

He specifically says, "Repent and be converted SO THAT...AND THAT HE MAY SEND JESUS CHRIST." You are in error. "You will not see me from now on until you say..."
 

PrmtvBptst1832

Active Member
Site Supporter
Well I agree to some extent but tell me then how do you interpret this scripture as there seems to be a division to me?... Brother Glen:)

Acts 11:25 Then departed Barnabas to Tarsus, for to seek Saul:

11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

?
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Because of the multitude of the whoredoms of the wellfavoured harlot, the mistress of witchcrafts, that selleth nations through her whoredoms, and families through her witchcrafts. -Nahum 3:4; cf. Rev. 18:23

"...“it is particularly interesting that the Qumran scroll 4QpNah [4Q169]has accommodated the whole text of Nahum to Jerusalem.” (Provan, p.93) ...."
Notes on the Book of Revelation_Harlot Babylon and Bride Jerusalem

I ordered a book several years ago entitled, "One God And One Lord." It was written to disprove the deity of Christ. Other than offering nothing but straw man arguments, it always insisted the text was in question.

What's NOT in question is the attitude of the Qumranians toward Jerusalem contemporary to their day, 1st century B.C.

Excerpts from an interesting piece on a Postmil blog:

"...The DSS [Dead Sea Scrolls] were written by a sect of Jews who separated from Jerusalem to live in the area of Qumran sometime around 100 B.C. They wrote many documents regarding their reasons for leaving Jerusalem and the temple system. They held out hopes of the current high-priestly aristocracy being overthrown so that Jerusalem could be purified. Their writings scathingly revile Jerusalem, the temple and the inhabitants of Jerusalem. Were these devout Jews anti-Semitic? Consider their writings:

According to Iain Provan (JSNT 64 [Dec., 1996]: 92-93) in 4QpNah the Qumranians “accommodated the whole text of Nahum to Jerusalem (‘Nineveh’), indicating the way in which even texts that did not originally concern faithless Israel could be read as if they did.” There they even declared of their fellow Jews that Jerusalem was the “dwelling place” of the wicked of the nations.

Commenting on Hab 2:8, the Qumranians stated that “this concerns the last priests of Jerusalem, who shall amass money and wealth by plundering the peoples. But in the last days, their riches and booty shall be delivered in to the hands of the army of the Kittim [i.e., Romans]” (1Qp Hab 9).

The Qumranians scorned the temple priests. The high priest “robbed God and amassed the riches of the men of violence who rebelled against God, and he took the wealth of the peoples, heaping sinful iniquity upon himself” (1Qp Hab 8:11-12). 1QpHab 7 speaks of the “Wicked Priest” so that when he “ruled over Israel his heart became proud, and he forsook God, and betrayed the precepts for the sake of riches. He robbed and amassed the riches of men of violence who rebelled against God, and he took the wealth of the peoples, heaping sinful iniquity upon himself.”

They interpret Hab 2:8 thus: “this concerns the last priests of Jerusalem, who shall amass money and wealth by plundering the peoples. But in the last days, their riches and booty shall be delivered into the hands of the army of the Kittim [Romans]” (1QpHab 9). They write: “The city is Jerusalem where the Wicked Priest committed abominable deeds and defiled the temple of God. The violence done to the land: these are the cities of Judah where he robbed the poor of their possession” (1QpHab 12). In the Tosefta (t. Men. 13:22) we find the reason for the destruction of the first century Temple: “On what account did they go into exile? Because they love money and hate one another.”

The Qumranians withdrew from Jerusalem partly due to Jerusalem’s leaders being “the Spouter of Lies who led many astray that he might build his city of vanity with blood and raise a congregation on deceit” (1QpHab 10:12). The separatist Qumran community deemed Jerusalem “a place of vanity built with blood” (CDC 12:2), a “fortress of wickedness” (4QTestimonia).

Luke T. Johnson (“The New Testament’s Anti-Jewish Slander and the Conventions of Ancient Polemic,” Journal of Biblical Literature 108 [1989]: 439) writes: “Anyone who has read the Dead Sea Scrolls knows that the community that wrote them had an extreme hostility to all outsiders.” They called Jews outside of their own community “sons of the pit” (1QS 9:16; CD 6:15; 13:14), who are ruled by the angel of darkness (1Q3: 19-21; 5:2, 10), and are “the ungodly of the covenant” (1QM 1:2). Of those Jews they write in 1QS 2:4-10: “Be cursed of all your guilty wickedness! May he deliver you up to torture at the hands of all the wreakers of revenge.”

Thus, the Qumran community deemed Jerusalem as defiled and worthy of divine curse (CDC 1:3; 4:18; 5:6; 6:16; 12:1-2), as did much of the apocalyptic literature beginning in 200 B.C., as we see in 1 Enoch 83-89; The Apocalypse of Weeks; T. Levi 17:10; and Jubilees 23:21....."

The Qumranian attitude toward the apostate religion of their day gives background to the Holy Spirit's charge against 'that generation' of Christ's day:

51 Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Spirit: as your fathers did, so do ye.
52 Which of the prophets did not your fathers persecute? and they killed them that showed before of the coming of the Righteous One; of whom ye have now become betrayers and murderers; Acts 7

...and to the words of Christ Himself:

32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.
33 Ye serpents, ye offspring of vipers, how shall ye escape the judgment of hell?
34 Therefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: some of them shall ye kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city:
35 that upon you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth [Revelation 18:24], from the blood of Abel the righteous unto the blood of Zachariah son of Barachiah, whom ye slew between the sanctuary and the altar.
36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. Mt 23
 
Last edited:

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Their writings echo the Song of Moses [Revelation 15:3] and foreshadow that of the New Testament era concerning 'that generation':

5 They have dealt corruptly with him, they are not his children, it is their blemish; They are a perverse and crooked generation.
20 And he said, I will hide my face from them, I will see what their end shall be: For they are a very perverse generation, Children in whom is no faithfulness. Dt 32

40 And with many other words he testified, and exhorted them, saying, Save yourselves from this crooked generation. Acts 2

39 But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given it but the sign of Jonah the prophet:

45 Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more evil than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man becometh worse than the first. Even so shall it be also unto this evil generation. Mt 12

4 An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of Jonah. And he left them, and departed. Mt 16

Reference Josephus:

“It is therefore impossible to go distinctly over every instance of these men's iniquity. I shall therefore speak my mind here at once briefly: - That neither did any other city ever suffer such miseries, nor did any age ever breed a generation more fruitful in wickedness than this was, from the beginning of the world.....” Book 5, ch 10, sec. 5

“.. I suppose, that had the Romans made any longer delay in coming against these villains, that the city would either have been swallowed up by the ground opening upon them, or been overflowed by water, or else been destroyed by such thunder as the country of Sodom (20) perished by, for it had brought forth a generation of men much more atheistical than were those that suffered such punishments; for by their madness it was that all the people came to be destroyed....” Book 5, ch. 13, sec. 6

“....and I cannot but think that it was because God had doomed this city to destruction, as a polluted city, and was resolved to purge his sanctuary by fire, that he cut off these their great defenders and well-wishers, while those that a little before had worn the sacred garments, and had presided over the public worship; and had been esteemed venerable by those that dwelt on the whole habitable earth when they came into our city, were cast out naked, and seen to be the food of dogs and wild beasts. And I cannot but imagine that virtue itself groaned at these men's case, and lamented that she was here so terribly conquered by wickedness.....” Book 4, ch. 5, sec. 2
 
Last edited:

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As I stated in a previous post, it is very unconvincing that Jesus taught his twelve apostles for approximately three years concerning the kingdom of God, and the apostles still ask Jesus before he was taken up (after spending an additional time during forty days with them after his resurrection), "Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?" Again, Jesus did not respond by blasting their expectation of such a kingdom. He only held their eager expectation for such a kingdom in check. Even Cleopas said, "But we were hoping that it was He who was going to redeem Israel. Indeed, besides all this, today is the third day since these things happened." Too bad these poor men did not have Revelation: Four Views. In fact, Jesus gave them every reason to believe in such a kingdom.

And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. -Mt. 8.11

I suppose you might say that you are now seated in heavenly places with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob...

And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on the left, in thy kingdom. But Jesus answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with? They say unto him, We are able. And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father. -Mt. 20.21-23

Again, Jesus offers no correction to James and John's mother, another poor Premillennialist. He just answers her as if her question was valid to begin with.

Luke 17:21 cannot be taken as an absolute statement, not even by Postmillennialists. There are visible and invisible aspects of the kingdom. The Pharisees were failing to perceive the presence of the kingdom in their midst. As you stated, the kingdom was taken from them (Mt. 21.43). It was given to another nation, not the nations. Big difference!

Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom. -Lk. 12.32

And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me; That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel. -Lk. 22.29, 30

Spiritually eating and spiritually drinking at a spiritual table in a spiritual kingdom, and sitting (spiritually?) on spiritual thrones, judging (spiritually?) the spiritual tribes of a spiritual Israel. No wonder there are so many denominations. The scriptures can mean whatever we want it to mean.

Concerning John 14:26, the Holy Ghost had some interesting things to say about the kingdom of God:

And his father Zacharias was filled with the Holy Ghost, and prophesied, saying, Blessed be the LORD God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people, And hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David; As he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world began: That we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us; To perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant; The oath which he sware to our father Abraham, That he would grant unto us, that we being delivered out of the hand of our enemies might serve him without fear, In holiness and righteousness before him, all the days of our life. -Lk. 1:67-75

Perhaps the Holy Ghost was bringing what Jesus said to Peter's remembrance:

Repent therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, so that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord, and that He may send Jesus Christ, who was preached to you before, whom heaven must receive until the times of restoration of all things, which God has spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began. -Ac. 3.19-21

Was that an authoritative statement or was Peter still waiting for the Holy Ghost to reveal something different?
Jesus did NOT correct them by saying israel no longer had the promised Kingdom still, but that it was not at this time to move into it, as now in Church Age! And peter stated that Israel would receive Jesus in the future, and once they did, time of full restoration at hand!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
That is an interesting comment but what are you going to do with these verses?... Brother Glen:)

1 John 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

2:19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.
Always have been antichrists, but still coming a future Antichrist, man of Sin!
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is quite interesting, but hardly surprising.
Separatist cults are always hostile to the orthodox. One has only to read JW literature and its constant attacks on 'Christendom.'

That the Jewish priesthood in the time of our Lord on earth was an evil bunch is not at issue. Nor is the fact that He prophesied the destruction of Jerusalem. The question is whether all Bible prophecy centres on AD 70 or whether it centres on Christ; whether it speaks to all generations living all over the world or only to those living around Jerusalem at one period of time.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Separatist cults are always hostile to the orthodox.

Yea, they sure are.

7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said unto them, Ye offspring of vipers, who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Mt 3

34 Ye offspring of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. Mt 12

33 Ye serpents, ye offspring of vipers, how shall ye escape the judgment of hell? Mt 23
 

Covenanter

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
T Cassidy said:
Or if you would just give him a simple answer.

As in too lazy to type a simple "yes" or "no?" :)
[quote-"Y1"]
It is pretty easy to state if one is a pretierist/a mil/dispy etc!
[/quote]
I don't do one-liners !
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Which language does not have to be Jerusalem as I demonstrated.

No one has said it HAS to be Jerusalem. It just so happens that in this case it IS Jerusalem. There's many identifiers other than the 'harlot' aspect of Jerusalem, 'who was old in adulteries' [Ezekiel 23]. I really haven't delved into the 'harlot angle' yet. I'm not that anxious to gather and post that many passages. :D
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top