There is another aspect of the thread that was briefly mentioned but I think needs further exploration.
First, let me state that there is very little tolerance within me for anyone who molests a child.
It has been posted that this site operates on the premise that an arrest indicates guilt.
Law enforcement and related services have a huge power house - multiple layers and in general a huge resistance to admitting they got it wrong. Anyone who has been contrary to that government entity knows that it is an unequal fight at best. They do a very necessary and thankless job, but we have all heard and read accounts of over reach and over reacting. Isn't it strange that we put the authority of supervision and arrest of the social moral laws into those who are perhaps unregenerate? At least God appointed priests to uphold the law. But that is another topic.
Illustration - not true - given to establish a scenario, only:
A third grade age male followed an older man into a larger church restroom. The young male's zipper became stuck and in the desperation children have (always waiting till the last minute to go) asked if the man could help. About the time the zipper became unstuck, the father walks in, makes a false assumption, and assaults both verbally and physically the older man. The continuing commotion brings others to the scene and the father is held back with much shouting and of course the whole family becomes part of the fray. By the time the police arrive the details are that the older man "touched" the child so he was arrested. It took thousands of dollars and a jury trial to find the man innocent, but the dad continued to smear the older man's reputation so much that to this day folks do not trust him and whisper slander among each other.
Is it not possible that person could have easily ended up on the website in question which would continue the false accusation and ignore the truth?
Is that not sinful?
Perhaps the site could have been better served to rely upon convictions rather than arrest.
I know that some who post are going to suggest alternatives the older man could have relied upon, but try to stick with the proposed story and don't second guess alternatives. OK, do with it as you will.
To those who have gone through the horrible trauma of molestation, there is healing, but the stink and sting memory can bring is not erased until after the last judgment. Women need to find a Godly and skilled woman counselor, that they may visit from time to time throughout their life. Men need to find a Godly and skilled man counselor. Do this early and visit at least once a year; that way the counselor has a record of the trauma, and you don't go in "cold turkey" in rage and desperation; the counselor trying to handle history and the manifestation at the same time.
After many years, I have recently come to the uneasy conclusion that the pastor of the church may not be the best person in which to seek counsel. The trauma person doesn't need to feel doubly violated in regret when they hear of the pastor's moral failure. A wise pastor will recommend Godly counselor(s) and not allow an avenue of vulnerability to either he or his family.