Which would be recommended for a new believer?I think a plain text is better.Some footnotes -- but not an out and out Study Bible.They have their place but I really don't think all that material should be in the confines of Holy Writ.There are Bible commentaries and other Bible Study helps which one can find the same info.A new believer needs to encounter the plain Bible text.Too much else (even good stuff) is a distraction.I think there should be more words from the actual Bible text on a given page than words from Study Helps.
Now it's different when someone adds their own notes in the margins (as I have).That means you are really studying and not relying on a Study Bible.
I may sound inconsistent when I recommended that a KJVO'er should get a copy of a real 1611.But even with all the notes, those are not really Study Bibles as such.The original Geneva Bible could be considered one though.
Now it's different when someone adds their own notes in the margins (as I have).That means you are really studying and not relying on a Study Bible.
I may sound inconsistent when I recommended that a KJVO'er should get a copy of a real 1611.But even with all the notes, those are not really Study Bibles as such.The original Geneva Bible could be considered one though.