Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
Based on what?,and ordained or appointed should read directed in Acts.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Based on what?,and ordained or appointed should read directed in Acts.
Jesus knew Judas intended to betray Him
Asked and answered.Based on what?
First, tasso is claimed not to mean agreement by mutual consent. Then it was claimed 5 lexicons did not include that meaning. Now posts #90, 93, and 95 are ignored.
Back to agitation I see.Again, Calvinists say they do the same thing, so who is right? In fact, we believe that non-calvinists reinterpret things to appease their belief system.
So God speaks directly to you in an audible voice? You don't need help from anyone else? There is nobody wiser than you? I know that isn't what you are saying but that is the way this comes across. So we should not have listened to the sermons of Peter and Paul if we were alive at that time? We should not have asked them? This position is just nonsense.
No, my point was made in my post. You ignored it. I study to show myself approved. Yes, we are to pour over God's word. Yes we are to scrutinize it. Do you know what that word means? To examine or inspect closely and thoroughly. If I did not do that I would be worried.Back to agitation I see.
God doesn't speak the way you think.. He speaks to me through His word. He can speak to you the same way. Your only problem is you are to busy scrutinizing His word.
MB
I'd call it what it truly is and that is fatalism. Every thing in Calvinism depends not on God, but fate. It's a gamble at beat.Asked and answered.
First, tasso is claimed not to mean agreement by mutual consent. Then it was claimed 5 lexicons did not include that meaning. Now posts #90, 93, and 95 are ignored.
Summary : You were saved or damned from all eternity for all eternity and there is nothing you can do to alter that outcome of your life or the lives of ;your loved ones, thus Calvinism boils down to the doctrines of futility.
There is no support in the bible for Calvinism, the claimed support arises from mistranslations (luke 14:23 and Acts 13:48) or ambiguous verses.
This is nonsense. Calvinism depends solely on God.I'd call it what it truly is and that is fatalism. Every thing in Calvinism depends not on God, but fate. It's a gamble at beat.
MB
I'm sorry David you are right but your religion is a gamble at best.No, my point was made in my post. You ignored it. I study to show myself approved. Yes, we are to pour over God's word. Yes we are to scrutinize it. Do you know what that word means? To examine or inspect closely and thoroughly. If I did not do that I would be worried.
I'd call it what it truly is and that is fatalism. Every thing in Calvinism depends not on God, but fate. It's a gamble at best.
MB
Which of course none of that is true. Looks like the only one giving false accusations about others is you.Yes, exhaustive determinism, where everything has been predestined absolves the lost and Christ's ambassadors of any responsibility for seeking God, trusting in God, spreading the word, accurately handing the word, discipling others, and training them to become effective ambassadors for Christ.
No it doesn't it depends on fate.This is nonsense. Calvinism depends solely on God.
Two points I see you attempting to make:The Greek word translated "appointed" refers to an agreement by mutual consent. Therefore the actual meaning is "as many as had accepted Paul's direction to eternal life believed.
Once again the supposed support for Calvinism is based on mistranslation.
It isn't just as "idea".2) Acts of the Apostles 13:48 with the NASB translating it as "appointed." Here the idea is some of the Gentiles that heard the gospel's direction to eternal life from Paul believed
Yet another taint so post. Calvinism has once again been shown to be bogus.Which of course none of that is true. Looks like the only one giving false accusations about others is you.
I'm sure you believe that....Unfortunately, that doesn't make that a reality.Yet another taint so post. Calvinism has once again been shown to be bogus.
Two points I see you attempting to make:
1) The AV is not the word of God, because it wasn't translated correctly.
Got it.
2) "Appointed" doesn't mean "appointed" ( commissioned, chosen, selected ).
It means, "agreed upon by mutual consent".
Got it.
Now, I happen to think that there are places in God's word where this may be true...
Such as Acts of the Apostles 15:2 and Acts of the Apostles 28:23.
But not in Acts of the Apostles 13:48.
It isn't just as "idea".
It is relating a fact...some of the Gentiles believed.
Why?
Because they were ordained ( appointed ) to eternal life.
In the AV, "tasso" is translated as" ordained".
Definition:
τάσσω tássō, tas'-so; a prolonged form of a primary verb (which latter appears only in certain tenses); to arrange in an orderly manner, i.e. assign or dispose (to a certain position or lot):—addict, appoint, determine, ordain, set.
So, following through with your usage of "agreement by mutual consent", we see this rendered in other places:
" And I said, What shall I do, Lord? And the Lord said unto me, Arise, and go into Damascus; and there it shall be told thee of all things which are appointed ( agreed upon by mutual consent ) for thee to do." ( Acts of the Apostles 22:10 )
" Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained ( agreed upon by mutual consent ) of God." ( Romans 13:1 )
An interesting translation, Van.
I'm sorry, though...I cannot agree.
Yet another taint so post.I'm sure you believe that....Unfortunately, that doesn't make that a reality.