Super Bowl

My sentiments exactly, ha, ha. Dynasties can be so annoying, but in any case, Go Pats!

 

Go Pats!!!

 

lol! I like that prediction, Jack.

 

That's big of you, Jim, being from Pennsylvania and everything.

 

New England all the way. The Eagles are the best of a terrible NFC this year. I think just about all the teams in the AFC playoffs could beat the Eagles!

 

That's big of you, Jim, being from Pennsylvania and everything. </font>[/QUOTE]No problem!

 

Tim Fox, a former Pats safety (SB XX) was in a TV discussion about the recent Steelers game and felt Cowyer's decision to kick a field goal late in the fourth quarter was a key play, since a touchdown right there could have made it a 7 point game. I tend to agree with him. Cowyer was too cautious. What do you think, Jack, et al?

 

IMO, its all up to Philly,

You know that the Pats will come ready to play, they are the veterans here, and they always bring their A game.

Philly could come out and surprise them, I could care less about TO, he's more trouble than he's worth, but its all up to the Eagles, they have something to prove, and they have to prove it.

 

TO would make a difference if he were healthy, but unless the Eagles get a double digit lead early and keep scoring till the end, they don't have a chance. If it's a close game, NE wins. Thing is, I don't think that the Eagles can blow out the Pats...

S-Dave,
You know that if the Packers (or Lions) could get TO they would jump at the chance and he would be a huge benefit for either.

 

I remember when we the Steelers went to the Super Bowl .Rod Woodson was out for a good part of the year leading up to the Super Bowl .And played a little but was not near 100% ,Thats what T.O . will do .

 

As far as Cowher being to cautious ?I just think the Pat's were just to good .

 

Andy Reid got out his Super Bowl XXXI ring, and has been wearing it for inspiration. It's from when he was an assistant coach at Green Bay in 1997 when they beat guess who 35-21.

Can't you feel it? It's our year!

 

I'm sorry, Debby. I'm afraid you're mistaken. The Eagles are going down, ha, ha.

 

The Eagles just are not good enough. The Pats are the class of the NFL. It is going to be a long evening for the Eagles and their fans. I am saying the Pats will win 31-10 with Corey Dillon winning the MVP.

 

I think the experience factor is worth a lot in the Super Bowl. SB history bares that out, but not really to the extent I thought. When a team without Super Bowl experience within the past 3 years plays a team that has been there within that time, the team with experience has won 10 of 16. Also, when the previous SB winner returns the next year, they have won 7 and lost 3.

These factors, coupled with the prospect that T.Owens will not play or will not be full strength if he does, clearly puts this in favor of New England.

 

But Philly have a defense. i dont know. i think philly can pull it i really do.

 

You're going to be disappointed, J.A.B. I can't believe you're not putting your support behind the Irish quarterback, ha,ha. Tom Brady is the man!

 

ya i probly will be disappointed. tom brady has irish in him? i didnt know that. hes pretty cool. i have to say, i like NE, they only have one really cocky player on the team (corey dillon). and belichick is just IT. but i hate to see team dominate every year

 

J.A.B.,Now, you wouldn't feel this way about dynasties if your Chiefs were trying to win 3 in four years, am I right, ha, ha? Yeah, Brady is a very common Irish name (His dad is probably of Irish descent). Do you really think Dillon is cocky?

 

well your right, if the chiefs were getting ready to win the 3rd in 4 years i wlud be excited all right. but if it was the same teams this year and the eagles had won it 2 in the last 3 years i would pull for the patriots. well i knew brady is an irish name (have a few friends by that name), he probly is. or related to the brady bunch....