I am not taking sides because I like or dislike a person. I take sides based on what I know the situation to be. If someone is being unjustly "persecuted" then I support them, whether I like them or not. If both sides are right or wrong then I try to mediate the situation.
I agree you have formed an opinion of Dr. C based upon your views of a school he works with and a personal friend of the president and not from first hand knowledge of the person or his beliefs. It is honorable for you to admit as much. You are giving your opinion and that's that.
Dr. C would leave SWBTS if he was forced. He would go to Carson N if God told him. Dr. C had several options of teaching and pastoring in the USA and overseas. He prayed about the issue and God told him to go to C-N. Why? I don't know. If C-N is such a unbiblical place then it would make sense for God to send Dr. C there to clean it up. I don't know.
Why did some person go to become president of SEBTS? If it was such a unbiblical place because of Lolley and others why go? Maybe to clean house.
The fact is that I do know what went on behind closed doors because I heard the situation directly from both sides. The two versions do not conflict.
I agree you have formed an opinion of Dr. C based upon your views of a school he works with and a personal friend of the president and not from first hand knowledge of the person or his beliefs. It is honorable for you to admit as much. You are giving your opinion and that's that.
Dr. C would leave SWBTS if he was forced. He would go to Carson N if God told him. Dr. C had several options of teaching and pastoring in the USA and overseas. He prayed about the issue and God told him to go to C-N. Why? I don't know. If C-N is such a unbiblical place then it would make sense for God to send Dr. C there to clean it up. I don't know.
Why did some person go to become president of SEBTS? If it was such a unbiblical place because of Lolley and others why go? Maybe to clean house.
That is the question. But, again, you prove my point. The situation can't be that Dr. C was fired because he wasn't liked by whomever. In order to make this firing look good one has to believe that Dr. C was heterodox. And no one, from either side, is publicly making such a claim. If personal friends are privately making such a claim then they'll have to back it up with facts."Don't you think that Dr. Crutchley and Dr. Patterson/the Trustees could've agreed to disagree on an issue of Christian liberty and still go about the business of pursuing quality Christian education together?"
The fact is that I do know what went on behind closed doors because I heard the situation directly from both sides. The two versions do not conflict.