Syria accuses US of launching lethal raids over its borders

[poncho]

By Harry de Quetteville in Baghouz
(Filed: 29/10/2005)

Syria has accused the United States of launching lethal military raids into its territory from Iraq, escalating the diplomatic crisis between the two countries as the Bush administration seeks to step up pressure on President Bashar Assad's regime.

Major General Amid Suleiman, a Syrian officer, said that American cross-border attacks into Syria had killed at least two border guards, wounded several more and prompted an official complaint to the American embassy in Damascus.

He made the allegations during an official press tour of Syrian security forces on the Iraqi border, which the US claims is a barely guarded passage into Iraq for hardcore foreign jihadis.

While showing off what he said were beefed-up Syrian border measures designed to blunt those criticisms, including new police stations and checkpoints, Maj Gen Suleiman alleged that his own border forces had come under repeated American attack.

SOURCE


US invader troops reportedly drive five kilometers into Syrian territory, lose armored vehicle in battle with Resistance fighters, then withdraw to occupied Iraq with their wreckage.

SOURCE

Google Search -> u.s. casualties in syria

Leaving Iraq? Hardly. We've only just begun the drive to control Eurasia.

 

[guitarpreacher]

Poor Syria. They try so hard to prevent terrorism and the big bad U.S. picks on them anyway.

Way to use such a credible source to push your agenda there Poncho

 

[hillclimber]

Man o man, this has Bush, Cheney and Rumsfield written all over it.

 

[bapmom]

I know I absolutely always believe everything that Syria and all other Middle Eastern countries say.

There were no tanks in Baghdad either.

 

[carpro]

I don't know if it's true or not, but if terrorists are crossing the border into Syria to evade being killed or captured by coalition troops, it needs to be.

 

[Terry_Herrington]

I wonder if this means the U.S. will invade Syria next in Bush's war on terrorism?

 

[Ben W]

If Syria have terrorist cells in their country, then western troops should cross their borders and deal with it appropriatley. Syria have the option of dealing with it themselves. Maybe Syria might like to ask Libya what they should do?

 

[KenH]

Originally posted by poncho:
Leaving Iraq?

Yes, we will. Just watch and see, poncho. After all, the GOP members of Congress want to get re-elected. And Bush doesn't want the Democrats in charge of the Congress. You know why? Does the word "impeachment" ring a bell?

And don't think for a moment that the Democrats wouldn't try if they get the Congressional power to do so.

 

[poncho]

That's rich Ken. Bush would be happier if there were no congress at all, it would be so much easier if congress were made up of World Trade Organizations and military industrialists making law to control the "people" and grab as much loot as possible. Hey, wait a minute that's more or less what we have now.

Democracy by of and for the elite. Everything North Americans have been taught to accept from "their government" wrapped into a false left vs right stage managed paradigm for the North American consumer to behold and go ga ga over while our country is being looted and brought low by criminal elite crime rings.

Why would criminals "impeach" their own? For show amigo, just for show. Globalists are in control of congress, makes no difference at all what letter they wear on their chest.

 

[poncho]

Originally posted by guitarpreacher:
Poor Syria. They try so hard to prevent terrorism and the big bad U.S. picks on them anyway.

Way to use such a credible source to push your agenda there Poncho

Mt agenda is to see that the United States government, that's you and me amigo, is freed from the globalist criminals now in charge of our legislative, executive and judicial branches.

What is you're agenda again? To uphold one faction of the criminal globalist party while denouncing the other? Good luck!

 

[Daisy]

Hmm, anyone else see yet another parallel to Vietnam? Secret raids and bombings in Cambodia & Laos then, secret raids and bombings in Syria now.

 

[KenH]

Where is the proof of secret raids and bombings in Syria?

 

[KenH]

Originally posted by poncho:
Why would criminals "impeach" their own? For show amigo, just for show. Globalists are in control of congress, makes no difference at all what letter they wear on their chest.

Your point is totally destroyed by the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

 

[Daisy]

Originally posted by KenH:
Where is the proof of secret raids and bombings in Syria?

Um, classified?

 

[Bunyon]

Sounds like a perfectly reasonable tactical thing to do to me.

 

[KenH]

Originally posted by Daisy:
Um, classified?

Well, if after the Iraq intel debacle I am going to hold the U.S. government to a much higher standard for evidence I must hold non-governmental sources to a much higher standard as well.

Without solid proof I must, therefore, ignore this idea of raids and bombings of Syria.

 

[carpro]

Originally posted by Daisy:
Hmm, anyone else see yet another parallel to Vietnam? Secret raids and bombings in Cambodia & Laos then, secret raids and bombings in Syria now.

The main problem with the raids and bombings of Laos and Cambodia was that they were secret.


The same goes for Syria if they are as blatantly sheltering terrorists as Laos and Cambodia were sheltering the North Vietnamese while pretending they weren't there at all.

 

[Baptist in Richmond]

Originally posted by Terry_Herrington:
I wonder if this means the U.S. will invade Syria next in Bush's war on terrorism?

I used to think this is the case, but I am starting to believe Iran is next.....

Regards,
BiR

 

[carpro]

No invasion of Iran is necessary.

We just need to destroy their nuclear capability ...or let Israel do it.

 

[poncho]

Originally posted by KenH:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by poncho:
Why would criminals "impeach" their own? For show amigo, just for show. Globalists are in control of congress, makes no difference at all what letter they wear on their chest.

Your point is totally destroyed by the impeachment of Bill Clinton. </font>[/QUOTE]Really? I noticed Clinton's Exo's are still in effect. George Bush and the 'conservative' republicans haven't changed them any at all. Wonder why?

George Bush's latest Exo makes the President's records off limits from Regean to Bush Jr. That includes Poppy Bush's papers and Clinton's. How nice of Clinton's buddy George Bush Jr to help Bill and Poppy out with their little 'secrets'.

Buddies that fish together can scam together.

We aren't going to pull out of Iraq Ken, that isn't the plan. The plan is to control all of Eurasia.

"It is written".