Syria, Rebels, Assad ... what is going on

[Don]

So fund war for the sake of war? Craziness.

It's the classic "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" thinking.

But what happens when both of them are your enemies? You end up having two friends, who are also both your enemies....

Frankly, it's a strategy. Clever? Only if it can be successfully pulled off, and both of them end up wiping each other out. Unfortunately, as history has proven (and Poncho has pointed out), we're not very successful....

 

[Crabtownboy]

So fund war for the sake of war? Craziness.

Not just for the sake of war ... but to keep them after each other and not after us.

 

[Tom Bryant]

Not just for the sake of war ... but to keep them after each other and not after us.

So destabilize an already volatile area... you are worse than Karl Rove ever was because you hide your lunacy behind a mask of classic left wingism.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Yup. For all the accusations of warmongering and racism leveled at conservatives, C.T.Boy shows himself to be a warmongering racist.

 

[InTheLight]

Not just for the sake of war ... but to keep them after each other and not after us.

I was not aware that the government of Syria or Iraq was after us.

 

[Aaron]

Yup. For all the accusations of warmongering and racism leveled at conservatives, C.T.Boy shows himself to be a warmongering racist.

Joining the BB when Obama took office, he is here merely to justify by whatever absurdity necessary either through his corrupt postulations on the Scriptures and Chrisitianity, or through his Marxist rants and Communist indictments of American political doctrines Obama's sedition.

 

[poncho]

It's the classic "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" thinking.

But what happens when both of them are your enemies? You end up having two friends, who are also both your enemies....

Frankly, it's a strategy. Clever? Only if it can be successfully pulled off, and both of them end up wiping each other out. Unfortunately, as history has proven (and Poncho has pointed out), we're not very successful....

When Kermit Roosevelt was bragging about using false flag terrorism to overthrow Mossadegh he said he was surprised it actually worked. After that it became a permanent part of "our" foreign policy.

 

[poncho]

Nope, nothing you said. Just .... guess I'd best not go there. :laugh:


Playing off one side against the other is the only thing that makes sense to me. Guess the conspiracy folk do not like that ides ... too rational I guess. :laugh:

Divide and conquer.

Playing one side against the other is a very effective way to defeat an enemy without him knowing it. It keeps him distracted and drains his resources and energy. Just look how successful the globalist bankers and corporitos have been in playing you against the republicans and they against you. They've been able to tear down our once great constitutional republic and replace it with an authoritarian big brother police state right under our noses because you democrats and republicans have been so focused on chuckin rocks at each other instead of guarding your liberties.

The Hegelian Dialectic explained in five seconds or less . . . In theory . . .Thesis vs Antithesis = Synthesis. In action . . . Democrats vs Republicans = Corporate Controlled Totalitarian government.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. Sun Tzu

 

[poncho]

Bump......