Take This Christian Music Test

Is Music Really Neutral?
Dan Sweatt
First published in
Frontline November/December 1991
Vol 1 N 6


The Sixties Revolution

Let it be clearly understood that the only people on the face of the earth, in this generation or any other, who have tried to promote the "neutrality of music" are Christians living after 1965.

What happened in the mid-sixties that was significant enough to cause many fundamental Christians to ignore what was then and is now common knowledge among musicians? I believe the roots are sociological rather than musical. Those of us who lived during that tumultuous time remember well the social climate. All that was traditional was suspect. The young rejected anything even vaguely associated with "the establishment." Perhaps the most traditional of all institutions was the church, and perhaps the most traditional of all aspects of the church was the music. The cry became "Give us something new!"

Simultaneously in the secular world a new form of musical expression had captured the minds as well as the imaginations of this restless generation. This music they could feel! It gave voice to their rebellion and to their passion.

Preachers fearlessly assailed the pivoting hips of Elvis and the moppy hair of the Beatles. The miniskirt was unclothing our girls, while every other standard was being pushed to the limit. Compared to rock-and-roll, church music seemed bland indeed.

On the one hand, preachers were fighting the rebellion—no long hair, no short skirts; on the other, they feared "turning off" this generation who had quite different tastes. It was against this backdrop that someone began to use rock-and-roll as a vehicle to reach this new generation. The reasoning was, "If we are going to reach them, we must speak their language."

With the ever-widening media influence and so many in the church becoming entertainment oriented, the stage was set. "Get them to the church by giving them what they like; then give them what they need. Since a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down, let’s coat the gospel with rock-and-roll." Someone described it in this way, "We’ll sneak up on them and inoculate them with the gospel before they know it."


Flaws in Contemporary Logic

As viewed from twenty-five years down the road, this approach had several obvious problems. The first is that the gospel is not medicine, but it is "the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believeth." It does not need covering up to make it more palatable or jazzing up to make it more relevant. It merely requires proclaiming so that God can do His work. Secondly, many preachers had already begun, and rightly so, to attack this music’s sensuality, its driving jungle rhythm and the bizarre dress and behavior of its performers. But as the pressure mounted and apologists asked questions for which these preachers had no answers, many began to ignore the music and focus on the messages the songs gave. To be sure, preachers had plenty to preach about there. However, because most preachers did not feel qualified to talk about the music itself beyond the phrases "jungle beat" and "too loud," musicians interpreted their silence as tacit approval. With a little faulty logic about reaching the lost with its own music but with Biblical words, the corner was turned. If music is neutral, then why not use any style to communicate a good message? If the message of the text is all that matters, then any musical vehicle is appropriate.


The Message of the Music

The problem is that the message of the music is at least as powerful as that of the lyrics, and the perception of the message is greatly colored by the vehicle that carries it. So today every musical style imaginable from country to heavy-metal is being called sacred. How in the world did we move from traditional church music to Stryper in twenty short years? By accepting the totally fallacious position that music is neutral.

But music is not neutral. Its message comes through loud and clear—often more clearly than the overshadowed words. It is time the twentieth-century church considered the message it is communicating by its music. Rather than a message of salt and light, and of separation and holiness, it has become a message of compromise and confusion.

During the past twenty years, our young have taught us much about their music and free lifestyle; it is time we begin to teach them about godliness and holy living.

http://www.f-b-f.org/WebMan/Article.asp?ID=3902&Count=true

 

Let's not forget that David played his harp for Saul to drive out an EVIL SPIRIT. so music is not neutral! 1 Sam 16

 

No Ransom I was refering to the ones SFIC posted.he posted ALL the lyrics to Rez Band's baby killer songs

if you can find the lyrics (I COULDN"T) to Missions Bells please do. i went by memory to what was being played in my sons youth group that is the part i remember after reading them!

Don't be so quick to judge without all the facts

 

they probably figure you know where all the good food is

 

rbell i will not respond to you as it would just be casting pearls before swine. you do have the spirit of learning but of sarcasm. along with the poster above