Except that if you look up the definition of "terroristic," it's associated with those who participate in terrorism. The "ism" (or "istic") part of the word denotes a person who practices or is concerned with something; or holds certain principles, doctrines, etc.
Thus, in order to accurately use the term "terroristic," one must show that a certain practice and/or beliefs are involved.
I'm sure his beliefs were involved in his brutality.
Not sure I'd go that far; I'd expect to see blood if it were truly vicious and/or savage.
I'm only using the words you thought best to use.
And if there was blood involved you would still have some blind "conservatives" calling the use of the terms 'vicious' and/or 'savage' extreme.
Last edited by a moderator: