Texe Marrs

I've listened to his program twice I believe. I remember him to praise the name of Jesus Christ and speak favorably of His Word. What is the "decidedly-abnormal behavior" I should notice?

The conspiracy that Mc Carthy saw was true. The men he named as communists were, in fact, communists.

Aaah yes...now we're getting somewhere.

 

Personally, I would rather not see actual proof. However, the circumstantial evidence is pretty compelling and all that is missing is a stained dress.

It is not disputed that Jeff Gannon aka Jim Guckert possible alias, Johnny Gosch is a sodomite prostitute who's naked images are available to all on the web.

It is not disputed that Jeff Gannon is barely a journalist as he had no prior journalism experience before getting gigs with GOPUSA and Talon News, and making it all the way to the White House.

It is not disputed that Talon News is hardly a world class news organization as when it was called out for plagiarism this publication shut down.

It is further not disputed that Mr. Gannon was provided press passes for 150+ press briefings and visited the White House more than 200 times with multiple visits to the White House on dates where press briefings were not held.

There is pictoral evidence of W rubbing the head of this sodomite prostitute, grasping the neck while hugging this sodomite prostitute, and kissing the head of this sodomite prostitute.

This is the most sodomite friendly White House ever in existence and the prez has pinky appointments all over the place. There is far more evidence to support the contention that Bush is bisexual than ya'lls contention that Mr. Marrs is "insane", a "nut" or an "American Nightmare".

 

Don't hold your breath Tim. That is how Texe works. He makes outrageous statements like these and then when asked for verification, he turns and attacks those who would dare ask. He would have chastized the Bereans, shows he is nothing like the Apostle Paul.

Bro Tony

 

"Let those who are ignorant remain ignorant still..."

Bro Tony

 

You're right...a lot of churches and pastors sell their tapes, merchandise, etc; i'm not one of them since i usually have to pay people to listen to me preach. :laugh:
My point is this: The first thing you see on his page are those credit card logos!
You don't see them on the website for the church i serve, i know that much.

 

WOW... I used to have a friend that was gay.
I worked with him, we had lunch together
I think I even hugged him one time goodbye...

And all this time I thought I was straight!!!
Whatever happened to the person here on BB that used to claim you could "catch gay?" I certainly hope I don't have it!!!!!!!

I think I better go check in with my wife... just to make sure!

HONEY!!!!! HELP!!!!

 

Brother Tony, may I call you that? You are my brother right? I confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh and maybe you do as well?

Which of the points that I made would you consider to be ignorant or without foundation and why would you feel compelled to call me ignorant rather than provide an argument for why I am in error?

You're a pastor of a flock are you not? Is this how you handle your sheep when they disagree with you?

It is an interesting phenomena the way "Christians" treat each other. I would far prefer to be on the side of the "nuts", "insane" ones, "American nightmares", and "ignorant" then on the side that uses these terms as a replacement for making an effective argument.

"For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another." - Galatians 5:14-15​

 

There is nothing wrong with asking for proof when someone makes outlandish claims... actually, we should...

Isn't there something in the Bible about not believing something unless there are 2 witnesses...
Soooo

Where are the 2 witnesses that Bush is bisexual?

To keep claiming this without proof is gossip.
And we should not be upholding gossipers.

Sooo...

PROOF PLEASE

 

You being straight or gay has nothing to do with the "leader of the free world" giving access to a White House briefing room to a plagaristic "journalist", sodomite prostitute and hugging and kissing on him and you making the claim that Mr. Marrs is a nut for these claims. Jeff Gannon was not professionallly qualified in a journalistic sense to obtain one of the most sought after gigs in journalism. However, it is quite possible to probable that he was qualified via another profession.

By the way. I just went to your web site. I found it interesting that one of the first things I noticed was a Discover Card advertisement at the top of the page. I also noticed a Visa/Mastercard logo on the right. You may want to reevaluate that as some may find that cause to disfellowship and call you names.

 

I agree that there is nothing wrong with requiring proof and the connection of sodomy has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt but I do not agree that the claims are "outlandish".

There are more than 2 witnesses that will confirm that Jeff Gannon is:

• A sodomite
• A pornographer
• A plagarist
• An unqualified journalist

There are more than 2 witnesses that will confirm that Jeff Gannon:

• Was granted access to 150+ White House Press Briefings
• Attended the White House when there were no press briefings
• Received hugs and kisses from the president

There are more than 2 witnesses that will confirm that W has appointed more sodomites than any other past president.

The only thing that does not have witnesses or other proof is these two people in the actual act of their abomination.

At best our "Christian President" is not adhering to the following scripture:

"Abstain from all appearance of evil." - 1 Thessalonians 5:22​

 

Just be Berean, and get your head out of the sand brother.

Bro Tony

 

Care to make that confession?

The post you responded to and dropped the "let the ignorant be ignorant" verse was about Bush's pal Gannon. You did not provide a rebuttal to any of my points so is it possible that you are choosing to be ignorant about our president's relationship with a sodomite prostitute?

Surely being opposed to a people that are opposed to Christ does not make one bad does it? People rail against Muslims on this site all the time. 99% of the people in the nation of Israel do not confess Jesus Christ as Lord so what's the problem when a Christian speaks out against their antichrist behaviors and their antichrist Talmud?

What you call innocent photos, many consider evidence. Heterosexual Christian men do not hug and kiss on sodomite prostitutes. I suspect the president is a homosexual/bi-sexual and not because of Marrs arguments. Marrs is actually a bit late in the game to be making these claims.

Well that's silly. Billy Graham isn't the devil incarnate...he just works for him.

I've done a bit of research on Benny and the Word-Faith movement. One of the videos that I watched to help me along in the research was called The Blind and the Dead. You might check it out.

No one has shown me anything to cause me to think he isn't a brother. He is awake to a lot of truths that I came to understand outside of his site.

Yes it is a debate forum. However, we may have different definitions of what debate is. Dropping names and running is, I suppose, dealing with things quickly and straightforwardly however, it is not debate.

Likewise, I could make similar claims of you. I could say that I think your views are broadly bigoted and you are blind and willfully ignorant to the world around you. Perhaps I could say, you would prefer to be an ostrich and make sure that your head never rises up so that you might wake up and wake your followers up. I could say that you are a new age gatekeeper and perhaps a freemason. However, just like calling someone else ignorant, a nut, insane, American nightmare, narrowly bigoted, ignorant, has head in sand or all of the names that have been thrown at Mr. Marrs and myself in this thread, without an argument with foundation, they are groundless statements and do not make for convincing arguments.

 

First of all, what you said in the first paragraph does not prove Bush is a bisexual as Marrs claims.... you are spreading deceit.

Second, I think you have me confused with someone else. No where have I commented on the visa credit card logo on his sight. Look back through and you will see this. If he has a product to sell, and people wants to buy it, so be it.

Third, I have no control of the banner ads on the church's website.. that comes with the fact that bravenet is a free service....
And the donate button on the right side of the site was set up in case someone wanted to donate to the church... we are not selling anything.
It also helps members that go south for the winter to continue supporting the church through their tithes.

Please acknowledge the fact that I did not accuse him of wrong because he sells his goods....I'll be waiting..

I would just like to see proof that Bush is a bisexual...
Why many in America would love to see that....
It would have really helped in the election!!!

So, are you willing to support a guy that make claims he can't back up?
If so, you are just as guilty as he is.

 

But does that make him a bisexual as Marrs claims...
That is what I am asking proof for.

He is slandering the President.

 

Rufus, you jumped on Tony for calling you ignorant, and said he shouldn't because you are his Brother, now you just said another Brother in Christ, Billy Graham works for the devil....

Hmmm.. something wrong here.

 

Dufus_1611,
No fan of George Bush here, but you are way out of line. Since my leading others to the Lord is quite less than stellar, nothing to say bad about Billy Graham either. Are you on some sort of hate campaign? You should have been born in Salem, Mass around 1670, then you could have been one of the judges.

 

Sorry about the last post, I meant Rufus_1611.

 

I was looking for a confession ala 1 John 4:2. There are some nuts that think the spirit of antichrist can't make this statement. I'm not questioning your faith, I'm just testing you against scripture as I would expect a pastor would appreciate.

It proves that this sodomite prostitute met with the president, got hugs from the president and kisses from the president. Perhaps he doesn't lie with him but he sure must care a lot about him.

To be a bigot one must be intolerant towards other faiths and creeds. I tolerate other faiths and creeds I just don't walk with them or defend them. I am theologically opposed to any that do not call on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. The RCC is antichrist, Muslims are antichrist, and Judaizers are antichrist. Not my words...see 1 John 4:3.

My corrupt mind? I do not desire to hang out with, hug on, or kiss sodomite prostitutes yet there is a man that apparently does. You will defend that man and then say that I have a corrupt mind because I point out the obvious?

You are a defender of the ecumenical, universalist Graham as well? There is no such thing as an unbiased source but I think Cathy Burns did a fine job of exposing Billy Graham in her book called Billy Graham and His Friends. This issue probably deserves its own thread in order to give it more in depth attention.

Cool.

Rightbackatcha.

This discussion started from your one liner calling me ignorant. I considered that not an argument but a hit run. Perhaps I misinterpreted and you consider that to be an argument?

If there is plenty of foundation, I'm anxious to hear it.

I'm not a follower of Texe Marrs. I have listened to his radio program twice, I watched his video about the Word-Faithers and charismatics, I have read maybe three to four of his articles and I have read the mission statement on his site. Just like any brother in Christ I will defend him if I believe he is right. All I have heard to discredit him is hyperbole and name calling. If ya'll can make an argument that causes me to question his labor then I will certainly listen. However, I do not believe that a convincing argument has been made to demonstrate that he is "insane", a "nut", an "American nightmare" or any of the other names he has been called in this thread.

 

I have indicated that there is no proof.

I did not say that you made this claim. I was giving you a heads up because apparently people hold this condition against ministries that advertise for Discover.

Right. So you're saying economic conditions require that your church advertises for Discover (so they can get the free service). Texe and ministries like his sell books so that they can maintain their ministries.

I did not accuse you of this but I will acknowledge it.

I have indicated that I do not believe that the case is proven. However, there is certainly a lot of smoke around this pink fire.