Thank you KenH for presenting this for debate.
When I first read this, I came away with one conclusion. But after reading it again, I'm not sure my first blush take away was correct. Trying to break down Kenny's quote, it seems that the overarching topic is...
Logical progress A
1. The wrath of God is justice for sin.
2. Only perfection satisfies the law and justice.
3. Therefore, only Christ's sacrifice satisfies God's justice.
This all seems biblically logical and true to me. But Kenny didn't stop with this simple logical progression that was clearly true. He went on...
Up to this point, Kenny doesn't seem to be debating whether salvation is applied before or after a person's belief and faith. But only what satisfies justice (which is only the blood of Christ).
But the second part of the quote above makes a logical jump that does not follow, imo. It would appear that Kenny takes his simple logical formulation that is true and then adds, "for repentance is ever and always a God given turning away and denouncing of every false."
Since the logical progress (A) was already true. I scratch my head as to why Kenny thinks this added quote, after the logical progression was already true, needed to be added. Now the whole construction of the argument changes.
Logical progress B
1. The wrath of God is justice for sin
2. Since repentance is ever and always a God given turning away.
3. Therefore, only Christ's sacrifice satisfies God's justice.
First, B#2 has nothing to do with B#1 (as we already saw in logical progression A). Even if one agrees with Kenny on B#2, it has nothing to do with the satisfaction of justice. For faith, whether "given" or "enabled" or "intrinsically capable" has nothing to do with the satisfaction of justice (per logical progression (A).
Anyway, just some musing
Keep seeking God truth
When I first read this, I came away with one conclusion. But after reading it again, I'm not sure my first blush take away was correct. Trying to break down Kenny's quote, it seems that the overarching topic is...
If I restrict what Kenny says to just this overarching topic, then I find that I agree with him. That is, the satisfaction of justice..."The satisfaction of God's justice"
In other words, although Faith is man's required part per God...without the righteous obedience of Jesus Christ then justice would not have been satisfied. Sounds reasonable and biblically true to me....is found only in the righteous obedience of the Lord Jesus Christ unto death, even the death of the cross.
Logical progress A
1. The wrath of God is justice for sin.
2. Only perfection satisfies the law and justice.
3. Therefore, only Christ's sacrifice satisfies God's justice.
This all seems biblically logical and true to me. But Kenny didn't stop with this simple logical progression that was clearly true. He went on...
Kenny says that "It is never found through your repentance". This seems reasonable, that is, satisfying justice (which is the overarching topic he starts with) is not found in one's repentance. In fact, it has nothing to do with it.It is never found through your repentance, for repentance is ever and always a God given turning away and denouncing of every false way in which you had formerly sought to approach him in order to gain his favor.
Up to this point, Kenny doesn't seem to be debating whether salvation is applied before or after a person's belief and faith. But only what satisfies justice (which is only the blood of Christ).
But the second part of the quote above makes a logical jump that does not follow, imo. It would appear that Kenny takes his simple logical formulation that is true and then adds, "for repentance is ever and always a God given turning away and denouncing of every false."
Since the logical progress (A) was already true. I scratch my head as to why Kenny thinks this added quote, after the logical progression was already true, needed to be added. Now the whole construction of the argument changes.
Logical progress B
1. The wrath of God is justice for sin
2. Since repentance is ever and always a God given turning away.
3. Therefore, only Christ's sacrifice satisfies God's justice.
First, B#2 has nothing to do with B#1 (as we already saw in logical progression A). Even if one agrees with Kenny on B#2, it has nothing to do with the satisfaction of justice. For faith, whether "given" or "enabled" or "intrinsically capable" has nothing to do with the satisfaction of justice (per logical progression (A).
Anyway, just some musing
Keep seeking God truth