that the mountain of the LORD'S house shall be established in the top of the mountains,

[Iconoclast]

So you brazenly teach that the covenants are not fulfilled literally as the speaking party, God, made clear. It's gravely alarming that you don't see anything wrong with this. Wake up!

"No title deed of human construction could be more explicit than Jehovah’s promise to Abraham regarding the land.
...
Language could not serve in any legal transfer if this covenant does not stand" (Lewis Chafer, Systematic Theology, ch. xvii).

In the same line of reasoning, language could not serve in any legal transfer if the davidic covenant does not stand.

In fact, your posts are all non literal and what you really mean when you post is Barney is awesome. I don't know why you bother talking about Barney on a theology board.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am sure I have no idea what you are talking about with this incoherent post.

 

[Jope]

I am sure I have no idea what you are talking about with this incoherent post.

[Insults edited] The covenants of God are literal and you can't refute it: just like your best teachers can't either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Martin Marprelate]

καὶ οὕτως --- What does that mean?

'And thus;' In this way.

 

[Iconoclast]

[Insults edited] The covenants of God are literal and you can't refute it: just like your best teachers can't either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They have a proper understanding of the Covenant I think that's what you're really trying to say

 

[percho]

So, in what way, will we ever be with the Lord? Will that be the first moment in which we could hear the Lord say, Well done my good and faithful servant, have rule over X cities?

When will the saints be given rule with one like the Son of Man and crush the kingdoms of the world?

Daniel 7:24-27 Revelation 11:15 Daniel 2:42-45