The 1,000 years of Revelation 20:1-3. #8

[taisto]

First, it's "you're".
Second, I am not triggered by any of your content. I doubt that I disagree with much of it. I am not interested in reading long quotes from books. I read the books I want to read. I do like to get people's original thoughts though.


Third, I'm bound in a pit of willful ignorance? Interesting way to condemn a brother.

I will nitpick.
Alan wrote:
"This is from your Thread, below."

It's not "you are" (you're). Alan got it right. It's "your." It established ownership like "our," but with a "y" before "our" which is spelled "your."

Peace

 

[timtofly]

I will nitpick.
Alan wrote:
"This is from your Thread, below."

It's not "you are" (you're). Alan got it right. It's "your." It established ownership like "our," but with a "y" before "our" which is spelled "your."

Peace

Now your bound in chains in a Satanic pit of wilful ignorance.

This forum will not let you edit after a certain amount of time, an hour?

Make sure you do it right the first time?

 

[Piper]

I will nitpick.
Alan wrote:
"This is from your Thread, below."

It's not "you are" (you're). Alan got it right. It's "your." It established ownership like "our," but with a "y" before "our" which is spelled "your."

Peace

I was talking about what is in Bold.
It should be "You're bound in chains..."

 

[Alan Gross]

I was talking about what is in Bold.
It should be "You're bound in chains..."

View attachment 8936

See if you see another one; https://www.baptistboard.com/search/174438960/

 

[taisto]

I was talking about what is in Bold.
It should be "You're bound in chains..."

View attachment 8936

Alright.

Now, for one of my pet peeves:

Grammar police

I would hope that readers can get beyond minor grammatical errors and give grace to these things. For me, I couldn't care less about someone misspelling "there, their, or they're." I can figure it out by context so no big deal.

 

[Piper]

Alright.

Now, for one of my pet peeves:

Grammar police

I would hope that readers can get beyond minor grammatical errors and give grace to these things. For me, I couldn't care less about someone misspelling "there, their, or they're." I can figure it out by context so no big deal.

It's a joke. An Attempt to inject something humorous in a highly serious subject.

 

[Piper]

Reluctantly, I am using the ignore feature. And so far, it is working. I am not seeing the long, cut and paste quotes from people's books without any discussion of the truths presented. Makes threads easier to navigate.

 

[taisto]

It's a joke. An Attempt to inject something humorous in a highly serious subject.

Sorry, I missed the joke. I have often observed grammar police derailing threads when they have no argument.

 

[MrW]

If you cannot correctly use simple words like there, they’re, and you’re and your, you will have little to no credibility regarding weightier matters.