• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The 1 Day and the 1000 Years

Status
Not open for further replies.

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
not for Heaven, it is for here the physical world. Time will end. Rev 10: 6, and the use for time ends. Judgement begins
So don't you believe that Heaven is a real place? If it is a real place like New York, then it is in this space time continuum and is a created place. Christ went to prepare a place for us, the New Jerusalem, which will come down out of the sky onto this physical earth.
 

loDebar

Well-Known Member
But Heaven is a physical place created by God, is it not? Can God only look at His creation from a literal Heaven, or does He exist outside of His literal creation? The reference nowhere mentions Heaven. A day and a year are both His creations in Genesis. Time is the 4th dimension, and therefore literal.

Furthermore, if the one day and the 1000 years are a metaphor, what do they stand for?

It is not physical but spiritual
Physical reality was not created until Satan and others fell

2Pe 3:8


But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

with the Lord should bed a reference to Heaven or from God's perspective into time
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is not physical but spiritual
Physical reality was not created until Satan and others fell

2Pe 3:8


But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

with the Lord should bed a reference to Heaven or from God's perspective into time
Because He is communicating with us who live in the space time continuum He created. Why would He use some non-literal terminology to communicate literal truth?

Again, if "day" and "years" are figures of speech, metaphors, what concrete item do they refer to? A failure to answer this means you have not answered the OP.
 

loDebar

Well-Known Member
Sorry, you lost me.
2Pe 3:8


But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

Peter was writing to us a "beloved" for us to consider ..... how God treats us and will keep His promises to just and unjust

This was not a notice from God about time itself
 

Lodic

Well-Known Member
Like I said, preterists are vague and ambiguous. With a metaphor, you don't get vagueness, you get specific data. For example consider the metaphors of Eph. 6 and the armor of God. All of them are immediately explained and quite obvious. Yet you have not come up with a definite meaning for the supposed metaphor of 1000 years, much less the "day" reference. What is the "day" in this passage if it is a metaphor? Remember, it is the same as the 1000 years to God.

My point was that if God is outside of the space time continuum looking in, then the "day" and "thousand years" must be literal. Otherwise, the passage makes no sense. Why would God be looking into time at two metaphors which are the same to Him?
While preterists take a symbolic view of things that futurists take literal, we are not necessarily vague or ambiguous. I thought I had given a definite meaning, where the metaphor points to an unspecified period of time. As we agree, God's perspective of time is quite different from ours. Peter could just as easily have said that a day to God is the same as a million years, a hundred years, or even all eternity. Since God exists outside the boundaries of time, it's all the same to Him. Neither Peter nor John are trying to give us a formula or a timetable.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Because He is communicating with us who live in the space time continuum He created. Why would He use some non-literal terminology to communicate literal truth?

Again, if "day" and "years" are figures of speech, what do they refer to? A failure to answer this means you have not answered the OP.
The passage in question is calling to mind the eternality of God and so we should not fret because He delays His coming because at some point time will be no more and we will all be brought into the eternal state where it will have seemed so short a time between His Incarnation and Visible Bodily return to earth if it even matters to us then.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
2Pe 3:8


But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

Peter was writing to us a "beloved" for us to consider ..... how God treats us and will keep His promises to just and unjust

This was not a notice from God about time itself
I'm sorry, you are not making sense. Either 1 day and 1000 years are metaphors or they are not. If they are not literal, then what are they referring to?
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But to God time is still literal, since He invented it. :)
Time is literal. However God uses numbers sometimes as literal, sometimes as symbolic to represent a literal truth by the use of a symbol.
How often do you forgive 7 times? or 70x 7?...so 490 is a literal maximum?

In rev20...they lived a reigned with Christ a thousand years.
Is that a literal 1000yr millennium on earth? Or is a symbolic "thousand years" for the duration of the reign in heaven?


17 For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.

18 But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create: for, behold, I create Jerusalem a rejoicing, and her people a joy.

19 And I will rejoice in Jerusalem, and joy in my people: and the voice of weeping shall be no more heard in her, nor the voice of crying.

20 There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days: for the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.

21 And they shall build houses, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and eat the fruit of them.

22 They shall not build, and another inhabit; they shall not plant, and another eat: for as the days of a tree are the days of my people, and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands.

23 They shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord, and their offspring with them.

24 And it shall come to pass, that before they call, I will answer; and while they are yet speaking, I will hear.

25 The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the Lord.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
While preterists take a symbolic view of things that futurists take literal, we are not necessarily vague or ambiguous. I thought I had given a definite meaning, where the metaphor points to an unspecified period of time.
No, "unspecified period of time" is vague. And it is still referring to time. Metaphors typically do not refer to the same item ("unspecified period of time" referring to "1000 years"). They use one thing to refer to something categorically different. Again, look at Eph. 6, where each item of the armor is a metaphor, and the meaning is clearly given wherein it is quite different from the original item, yet the metaphorical meaning is clearly understood:
"14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;
15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;
16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.
17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:"
As we agree, God's perspective of time is quite different from ours. Peter could just as easily have said that a day to God is the same as a million years, a hundred years, or even all eternity. Since God exists outside the boundaries of time, it's all the same to Him. Neither Peter nor John are trying to give us a formula or a timetable.
You are still not understanding. I am not arguing for "a formula or a timetable." I am simply asking if the day and years are literal or not. I don't see how Peter can communicate his meaning if they are not literal.

Let me ask again: if the word "day" here is a figure of speech, what does it mean? You've given a meaning of sorts for the 1000 years, which in your view is not being used as an actual metaphor. (See the definition given above.)
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
literal or figurative?


Revelation 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
literal or figurative?


Revelation 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
I see no connection between this passage and the one in the OP.
 

Lodic

Well-Known Member
No, "unspecified period of time" is vague. And it is still referring to time. Metaphors typically do not refer to the same item ("unspecified period of time" referring to "1000 years"). They use one thing to refer to something categorically different. Again, look at Eph. 6, where each item of the armor is a metaphor, and the meaning is clearly given wherein it is quite different from the original item, yet the metaphorical meaning is clearly understood:
"14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;
15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;
16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.
17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:"

You are still not understanding. I am not arguing for "a formula or a timetable." I am simply asking if the day and years are literal or not. I don't see how Peter can communicate his meaning if they are not literal.

Let me ask again: if the word "day" here is a figure of speech, what does it mean? You've given a meaning of sorts for the 1000 years, which in your view is not being used as an actual metaphor. (See the definition given above.)
It's only vague in that we don't know how long a period of time Peter or John actually do refer to. If we did, we wouldn't be having this discussion. So, the metaphor refers to time, but we know how much time.

Maybe your point is that a metaphor is not the right term, based on the "armor of God" illustration. While I don't know what figure of speech the 1,000 years is, this is a comparative term to show us God's perspective vs man's perspective of time.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It's only vague in that we don't know how long a period of time Peter or John actually do refer to. If we did, we wouldn't be having this discussion. So, the metaphor refers to time, but we know how much time.
Sorry, this is not making sense to me. How in the world is "unspecified" not vague? If you say, "How much is that chocolate bar?" and I say, "The price is unspecified," aren't I being vague?

And you say "We know how much time." So, how much is it?
Maybe your point is that a metaphor is not the right term, based on the "armor of God" illustration. While I don't know what figure of speech the 1,000 years is, this is a comparative term to show us God's perspective vs man's perspective of time.
Why do you keep referring to the 1000 years but ignoring the day? And you cannot be convincing until you tell what figure of speech the 1000 years is (if it is not literal).

You see, it is much easier to say the day and years are literal. You've been dancing around the whole "figure of speech" idea, because if you say it is literal in Peter you have to say it is literal in Rev. 20. You're stuck in a conundrum, my friend. :Biggrin
 

loDebar

Well-Known Member
I'm sorry, you are not making sense. Either 1 day and 1000 years are metaphors or they are not. If they are not literal, then what are they referring to?
They are real here and time is in use here but not with God, In Heaven, time is not a reference

so you answer your question, in Peters letter they are literal but not in Heaven where the verse uses as a setting

it is like yen vs the dollar but no exchanged rate
 

Covenanter

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Quite often, those who believe in spiritualising prophetic Scripture come to this passage in 2 Peter 3 and say that it doesn't mean a literal day and years, so therefore we can take Rev. 20's 1000 years figuratively. Here is the Scripture (obviously referring to the 2nd Coming):

"8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. 9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. 10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up."

However, the passage makes much more sense as a literal day and literal years. First of all, note that Peter is doing theology proper here. God created time and space (the space-time continuum), so he therefore exists outside of it. The opposite view is called "open theism." This view regards God as a "risk taker." "Although he may have a plan for how he will bring things to pass, not knowing future actions of free moral agents, he often has to change his plans in light of unforeseen developments" (Millard Erickson, Christian Theology, 3rd ed., p. 369).

Now, if the 1 day and 1000 years Peter is talking about are symbolic, the passage makes no sense, thus: "One figurative day is with the Lord as a figurative thousand years, and a figurative thousand years is as a figurative day." See? That makes no sense. It also begs the question, what figure of speech is at play here? Is it a metaphor, or a simile, or an idiom, or hyperbole, or what?

We need to consider the CONTEXT.
3 Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. 4 They will say, ‘Where is this “coming” he promised? Ever since our ancestors died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation.’​

Peter was writing around AD 60, as the LAST DAYS of the Old Covenant were coming to an end. Jesus had said in his Olivet prophecy concerning the destruction -
30 ‘Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory. .......34 Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.
But now 30 years had passed & many of the Jewish leaders who had rejected Jesus had died & the next generation was in charge of Jerusalem. They were boasting that Jesus' prophecy of his coming for the destruction had not happened. They were saying that Jesus' prophecy is proved false. They were living proof of that.

Peter goes on to explain that the time lapse is because God is gracious -
8 But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: with the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. 9 The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.
10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.
Peter is saying that Jesus will come as he prophesied in the lifetime of THIS GENERATION. There is still time to repent, but soon the time for repentance will end. The heaven on earth which Jerusalem typified will be destroyed as prophesied, with all the elements of the Old Covenant. See e.g. Exo. 25:8, Psalm 84, Gal. 4:3,9

Peter continues by looking on to Jesus' final coming for resurrection & judgment & the NH&NE, with the same instruction Jesus gives at the end of his Olivet prophecy.
13 But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, where righteousness dwells.
14 So then, dear friends, since you are looking forward to this, make every effort to be found spotless, blameless and at peace with him. 15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote to you with the wisdom that God gave him.

Mat. 24:35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.
36 ‘But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. ...... 42 ‘Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come. 43 But understand this: if the owner of the house had known at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept watch and would not have let his house be broken into. 44 So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him.
That gives the indefinite time - a day as 1,000 years. Our generation still has time for repentance, but the present "millennium" will end, with no further opportunity for repentance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top