• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Biblical Doctrine of Condign Merit

jasonW*

New Member
My original questions:

So a work has to be motivated by the holy spirit?

How does that help someone who is supposed to do it to keep being saved? I mean, if it isn't from me, then what good is it?

If the only good works are those motivated by the holy spirit, then giving 10 million dollars to charity that wasn't motivated by the holy spirit is useless?

How do you know something is motivated by the holy spirit? How can I tell if something is motivated by the holy spirit and not by me...since we have established that only works motivated by the holy spirit are 'good' works, I don't want to waste time doing good works not motivated by the holy spirit.

Which moral laws? Where is that list? Does intention mean anything? Do you see where this is going?
All of the questions were 'answered' with a question except for the last one, to which you replied:

T2U sorta-answer
God's moral laws. Read your Bible.

Intention relates to being motivated by the Holy Spirit.
To which I replied:

DEFINITION OF WORK IS FROM BIBLE QUESTION
Reply by Jason
That is it? That is what it comes down to for you? All of the sudden the bible is the only thing we need to determine good works? Man, you flip flop more than Kerry. So, the bible isn't all we need for doctrine, but it is for works. We can't fully interpret the bible, or interpret it correctly for doctrine, but we can for works? Man, you have some serious 'splaining to do.
INTENTION QUESTION
Reply by Jason
That is not an answer. It is a side step. So, does intention matter? If one means to do good, but in the process does harm, was it a good work? Answer it this time.

jason
 
jason, this realyy shouldn't be that tough for you.

Acts of love and charity.

You don't need to do a lot of interpretting of Scripture to know what these things are. God put it on our hearts when we were created. Little children naturally know when they are loving someone or hurting them. It is only as we harden our hearts through sin that we blind ourselves to knowing or caring about it.

There are examples in Scripture, feed the hungry, care for the sick... etc.

No greater love than to lay down your life for another.

Like I said, it's not that hard to sort out.

As to intention, yes, intention matters.

If you accidentally do unforeseeable harm when you are trying to do good, it is judged differently than if you do harm without caring or on purpose.

Now, perhaps you could tell me what your as yet unspecified point to all this is.
 

jasonW*

New Member
Sorry. Just found the thread again....here we go, again.

Originally posted by trying2understand:
jason, this realyy shouldn't be that tough for you.
It isn't. I am just being difficult as you seem to not understand what you say.

Acts of love and charity.
And these are? What defines love and charity? To what degree must something be of love and charity to qualify?

You don't need to do a lot of interpretting of Scripture to know what these things are. God put it on our hearts when we were created.
Uh huh. So, what you are saying is that we now follow our heart?

Little children naturally know when they are loving someone or hurting them. It is only as we harden our hearts through sin that we blind ourselves to knowing or caring about it.
Again, so does it have to be driven by the holy spirit and does intent truley matter (what you just said points to intent not mattering)?

There are examples in Scripture, feed the hungry, care for the sick... etc.
So, if I care for my wife, that is a good work? Is it 'enough' to save me? What is enough?

No greater love than to lay down your life for another.

Like I said, it's not that hard to sort out.
Really? The more you talk, the more questions I have and the less obvious this becomes. A works based salvation system (anything that includes work in salvation) is inherently flawed for just the reasons I have asked you above: how much is enough? to what degree? does intent matter?

As to intention, yes, intention matters.

If you accidentally do unforeseeable harm when you are trying to do good, it is judged differently than if you do harm without caring or on purpose.
So if I actually do good, but I wanted to do it for tax purposes (giving all my money to charity, the church), that isn't a good work? Or it isn't as "good" a work as a real good work (what is a real good work?).

What if I take care of the sick because I like taking care of the sick, not because I feel it is the right thing to do? Some people actually like being doctors (my wife for one). That isn't as good a work as someone who hates taking care of the sick but does it anyway?

Now, perhaps you could tell me what your as yet unspecified point to all this is.
The same thing the point always is; to show you how the idea of a works based salvation is void of any true validity.

Ancillary points are to get you thinking about something you obviously accept at face value. With the achievement of thought, I can get you to recognize the absolute idiocy of a works based system (thereby achieving #1 as well).

jason
 
Originally posted by jasonW*:
Ancillary points are to get you thinking about something you obviously accept at face value. With the achievement of thought, I can get you to recognize the absolute idiocy of a works based system (thereby achieving #1 as well).

jason
So that is the basis for your confusion.

As a Catholic, I don't believe in a works based system.
 

jasonW*

New Member
Originally posted by trying2understand:
So that is the basis for your confusion.

As a Catholic, I don't believe in a works based system.
Yes you do. As a catholic you view works as necassary to the salvation process. This is what I am calling a works based system (anything that includes works in salvation).

Maybe I shouldn't call it that, but I did and I explained what I meant.

jason
 
Originally posted by jasonW*:
As a catholic you view works as necassary to the salvation process. This is what I am calling a works based system (anything that includes works in salvation).
Jason, based on your definition, I would hazard to say that you then also believe in a works based system of salvation.


Tell me, is repentance necessary for salvation?

If yes, then you believe in a system of faith and repentance. In other words, faith plus the work of repentance.
 

jasonW*

New Member
Originally posted by trying2understand:
Jason, based on your definition, I would hazard to say that you then also believe in a works based system of salvation.


Tell me, is repentance necessary for salvation?

If yes, then you believe in a system of faith and repentance. In other words, faith plus the work of repentance.
1. you are sidestepping the issues and questions, again.

2. who defines repentance as a work...getting back to the questions that I already asked!
 
Originally posted by jasonW*:
1. you are sidestepping the issues and questions, again.
I'm sorry, I missed the question. Could you restate it?

[/QUOTE]2. who defines repentance as a work...getting back to the questions that I already asked!
[/QUOTE]
I dunno. It's usually the non-Catholic party that is concerned about works.

Lets look at it this way to avoid that problem:

Will you agree that repentance is not the same as faith?

If you will conceed to that, and also agree that repentance is necessary to being saved, then being saved is a matter of faith and repentance.

In other words, not faith alone.
 

jasonW*

New Member
Originally posted by trying2understand:
I dunno. It's usually the non-Catholic party that is concerned about works.

Lets look at it this way to avoid that problem:

Will you agree that repentance is not the same as faith?

If you will conceed to that, and also agree that repentance is necessary to being saved, then being saved is a matter of faith and repentance.

In other words, not faith alone.
I don't want to do this. You are ignoring all the interesting questions that would challenge you. Instead you are trying to turn it around. Bad T2U! Bad!


And, did I ever say, faith alone? I think this thing called the bible says grace alone, through faith. Part of God's grace is the ability for us mortals to repent from our sins. And....enough of a sidetrack....answer the questions (at this point there might well be about a 100 unaswered questions).

jason
 
Originally posted by jasonW*:
I don't want to do this. You are ignoring all the interesting questions that would challenge you. Instead you are trying to turn it around. Bad T2U! Bad!
Actually, I keep asking you for the question.


I can't answer it until you ask it.

So we are saved by grace? Great, I agree that without God's grace, no one can enter Heaven.

But what about faith and repentance?

Can you be saved without them?
 

jasonW*

New Member
Originally posted by trying2understand:
Actually, I keep asking you for the question.


I can't answer it until you ask it.

So we are saved by grace? Great, I agree that without God's grace, no one can enter Heaven.

But what about faith and repentance?

Can you be saved without them?
Seriously, I'm done. This is getting annoying (no smiley faced need right now). I kept posting the questions, kept reasking the same general questions and you avoided them. So, until you can take the topic seriously, I think we should just set it aside.

If or when you have thought about it enough and feel comfortable actually discussing the topic, we can start over.

Until then....

jason

PS. Go UConn
 
Originally posted by jasonW*:
If or when you have thought about it enough and feel comfortable actually discussing the topic, we can start over.
Gee... I would think that asking you to state your questions several times would have given you the impression that I am attempting to discuss this with you.

I'm sorry, but this is a somewhat lengthy thread, and I'm just not sure of exactly what question it is that you keep referring too.

When you are up to it, how about asking your question and I will try to answer it for you.

OK?
 

John3v36

New Member
Originally posted by jasonW*:
[QB]
Originally posted by trying2understand:
Actually, I keep asking you for the question.


I can't answer it until you ask it.

So we are saved by grace? Great, I agree that without God's grace, no one can enter Heaven.

But what about faith and repentance?

Can you be saved without them?
2 Timothy 2:25 - In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;


repentance is a gift from God.

As you see below we are saved by Grace thought faith then come the works after you are saved.

Ephesians 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, lest any man should boast. 10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
 

Brother Adam

New Member
As you see below we are saved by Grace thought faith then come the works after you are saved.

Ephesians 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, lest any man should boast. 10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
Yes, within the bounds of a covenant relationship.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Originally posted by Brother Adam:
Yes, within the bounds of a covenant relationship.
Only if your a Catholic.
One is saved if they have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, covenants notwithstanding. Not everyone believes in covenantal theology--I am one of them. By your definition it would be impossible for me to be saved because I am outside of your imaginary unbiblical covenant.
DHK
 

Brother Adam

New Member
Peace be with you DHK.

Luke 22:20 (ESV)
And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, "This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood."
 

John Gilmore

New Member
Originally posted by Brother Adam:
Peace be with you DHK.

Luke 22:20 (ESV)
And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, "This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood."
"Covenant" is a poor translation. The correct word is "testament". Only one party is necessary for a testament. There is no covenant in Holy Communion. Christ freely gives us His body and blood without any merit, work, or worthiness in us.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Originally posted by John Gilmore:
"Covenant" is a poor translation. The correct word is "testament". Only one party is necessary for a testament. There is no covenant in Holy Communion. Christ freely gives us His body and blood without any merit, work, or worthiness in us.
Agreed. Covenant also implies the the promised agreement of two individuals. Salvation is God's work; God's promise; God's favor and merit to us. He did it all for us. It was all by grace to be accepted by faith.
There is no covenant involved.
DHK
 

John3v36

New Member
Originally posted by Brother Adam:
Peace be with you DHK.

Luke 22:20 (ESV)
And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, "This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood."
The covenant here is a new covenant. The old covenant is past away.
 
Top