• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Bridge Tract

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It emphasizes the cross. No the bridge is not the best in terms of its text. It's the best in terms of its illustrations.

I wasn't referring to The Bridge tract. I was referring to this statement you made:

Evangelist6589 said:
However John Pipers "Quest for Joy" does not [mention the resurrection] and is perhaps the best of tracts in my collection.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The MacArthur tract does not have it but does emphasize lordship salvation and repentance. Other tracts may have it but they preach easy believism. As I said no tract is perfect.
The statement of the Gospel as given by Paul in 1 Cor. 15:1-8 explicitly states the resurrection, making it an absolutely vital part of the Gospel. Then the entire rest of the chapter is on the resurrection.

On the other hand, repentance is implicit but not explicit in the Gospel. And Lordship salvation appears nowhere in the Gospel as taught in 1 Cor. 15 or proclaimed in the book of Acts. So even if I agreed with MacArthur on that, it would be implicit and not explicit in the Gospel.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm kind of unclear as to what "bridge tract" is being discussed here. Is it this one? http://www.majestic-media.com/index1.htm. But this one does mention the resurrection in the invitation at the end: "Believe that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Son of God who died for you on the cross, rose from the dead, and is Lord."

There have been other bridge tracts, including one in Japan which was adapted from one in China. I was told recently by an MK from South America that the original bridge concept was from Peru.

Here is the Japanese bridge tract, which I made into a letter size chart to do street evangelism with.
Japanese bridge.jpg
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm kind of unclear as to what "bridge tract" is being discussed here. Is it this one? http://www.majestic-media.com/index1.htm. But this one does mention the resurrection in the invitation at the end: "Believe that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Son of God who died for you on the cross, rose from the dead, and is Lord."

There have been other bridge tracts, including one in Japan which was adapted from one in China. I was told recently by an MK from South America that the original bridge concept was from Peru.

Here is the Japanese bridge tract, which I made into a letter size chart to do street evangelism with.
View attachment 1250


Oops must have missed that line. Thanks for pointing it out.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oops must have missed that line. Thanks for pointing it out.
You're welcome.

I think they could have said more about the resurrection, and say why you have to believe it to be saved, but at least it's in there. I've found that a lot of tracts do that--just have the resurrection as a mention in passing.
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You're welcome.

I think they could have said more about the resurrection, and say why you have to believe it to be saved, but at least it's in there. I've found that a lot of tracts do that--just have the resurrection as a mention in passing.

There is a tract by good news tracts called "Do all roads lead to God" and it goes in depth on the resurrection.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
After another look at this tract I have to say I was mistaken. It's very well illustrated and perhaps the best at that of any tract. I bought myself a pack of them and have used them to mail out to individuals (not churches or abortion centers) but individuals. Anyone here use this tract and what are your thoughts? I really do not have any gripes about it. Produced by Detroit Seminary a IFB Calvinistic place of education.

I could suggest they produce a ESV and NIV version but that's okay as the NASB is good enough. I like the alternative to the KJV and let me tell you that Fundamentalist usually do not produce tracts in other versions.
We live not far from ha College, and am surprised they printedin NASB, as their bookstore seems to be mainly Kjv!
 
Top