A British sharp shooter decision not to fire.........
Had England won in 1777 - how would that have changed world history?
Had England won in 1777 - how would that have changed world history?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
A British sharp shooter decision not to fire.........
Had England won in 1777 - how would that have changed world history?
A British sharp shooter decision not to fire.........
Had England won in 1777 - how would that have changed world history?
Was Washington ever a good General? Lining up in Napoleonic battle lines against British troops with superior artillery seemed to be what he did best.Scottish officer Patrick Ferguson, fighting for the British in the American Revolution, recruited a group of what we now call snipers. (That term originated for marksmen who were able to often successfully hunt snipes, a notoriously-difficult-to-hit game bird. They were simply called "sharpshooters in the 1700s.) Ferguson instructed them to try to pick off officers or enemy sharpshooters.
One of them had Gen. Washington in his sights, but Ferguson recognized him & told his man not to shoot him, as the colonists might place a COMPETENT commander in charge. This was before Washington had learned how to be an able general, & the British weren't afraid of him.
History woulda been vastly different, had that sniper shot Washington!
Ironically, Ferguson himself was killed by an American sniper at the battle of King's Moyntain in 1780. But his creation of sniper teams has survived to this day.
While his CHIEF contribution was keeping a fighting force in the field and getting it some funding, he FINALLY learned to seize the moment, as he did at Yorktown, combining his force with two French forces to trap Lord Cornwallis & his British force in Yorktown.Was Washington ever a good General? Lining up in Napoleonic battle lines against British troops with superior artillery seemed to be what he did best.
The British were broken in The Carolinas and Georgia.
Yorktown was only possible because Marion, Green, Elbert, etc. Had turned the war in the South.While his CHIEF contribution was keeping a fighting force in the field and getting it some funding, he FINALLY learned to seize the moment, as he did at Yorktown, combining his force with two French forces to trap Lord Cornwallis & his British force in Yorktown.
Cornwallis was not a poor commander, having won several victories earlier over the colonials, but he had no way out of the trap, & had to surrender.
All this was made possible by Washington's keeping the army together at Valley Forge. And his two victories with that army over the Hessians at Trenton & Princeton in late 1776-early 1777 didn't hurt, either! During that time, he eluded the much-larger force of that same Lord Cornwallis.
Especially the French Navy.And because of the French.
German Baron Von Steuben proved to be a super-valuable asset to the Continental Army, providing military training for officers & privates as well. He taught them how to deploy for battle, as well as how to use cover, shoot from several positions, etc. Being familiar with British tactics, he taught officers how best to counter them.Many Germans fought along side the Americans!
Yes, they did. The British mercenaries were Hessian Germans, from the German state of Hesse. The future-Americans hated them, & killed as many as possible when they could. The only british they hated as badle were troops under the command of Banastre Tarleton, whom had killed colonists attempting to surrender. And, of course, there was the aforementioned colonists' instructor & leader, the German Baron Von Steuben.Many Germans fought along side the Americans!
The British mercenaries were Hessian Germans, from the German state of Hesse.