OldRegular
Well-Known Member
I have yet to see a dispensationalist agree that John 5:28,29 teaches a general resurrection and judgment.How many times has a dispensationalist denied this to you?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I have yet to see a dispensationalist agree that John 5:28,29 teaches a general resurrection and judgment.How many times has a dispensationalist denied this to you?
Surely you don't hang all your theology on just one verse?I have yet to see a dispensationalist agree that John 5:28,29 teaches a general resurrection and judgment.
Surely you don't hang all your theology on just one verse?
Revelation 20:5-7 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years. And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
There are two resurrections separated by a thousand years. It is plainly described right here.
They are very clear verses. They speak of a resurrection of the just and a resurrection of the unjust; not one but two resurrections. Your interpretation of that same passage is flawed. Jesus speaks of two resurrections in that same passage.So I base my doctrine on two very clear verses from the mouth of my Lord Jesus Christ and you base your doctrine on three verses written in symbolic language from a book written primarily in symbolic language. But you still have not a single verse of Scripture that shows the pre-trib rapture!
Again you speak in absolutes, statements that you cannot prove and have no evidence for. Have you evidence that there is no church before Darby that did not believe in two resurrections? I don't believe you do. So stop with the uncertain babble. Back up your statements with evidence or don't make them.Actually it is not "My Doctrine". It is the doctrine the Baptist churches held until John Nelson Darby developed his dispensational doctrine. And unlike dispensationalism the early Baptist fathers did not have to invent a "parenthesis" church to support their doctrine.
[/SIZE][SIZE=+2]There is evidence from early church writers of dispensational thinking. Ref. "The Moody Handbook of Theology" by Paul Ennis.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]Writings of Justin Martyr, (A.D. 110-165)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]Iranaeus (A.D. 130-200)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]Clement of Alexandria (A.D. 150-220)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]Augustine (A.D. 354-430)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]Pierre Poiret (1646-1719)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]John Edwards (1637-1716)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]Isaac Watts (1674-1748)
Christ is the "firstfruits of the resurrection."Actually DHK, the first resurrection and only resurrection to date is that of Jesus Christ. Those who have part in the first resurrection are the "true believers". The second death, the lake of fire, has no power over the Saints.
Replacement theologians have to maintain that there is but "one gospel" and that the Jewish nation rejected it.
This is the foundation of Catholicism from the 4th Century onward to today.
If you want the "gospel" for this era, you need look no further than John's Gospel. Having been written
20+ years after the destruction of the Temple, and John having been confined to a Gentile penal colony,
John preached the simple gospel that any uneducated Gentile could understand without reference to a restoration
of the earth (ie: "Millennium"), rulership of earth from a throne in Jerusalem by a Messiah, or writings of Moses, or of David, or the Tenach, etc.
John 1:12-13 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
However, Jesus' prophetic statement still stands unfulfilled:
And this Gospel of the Kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
Mt 24:14
Now, the Replacement Theologians will tell you that the Kingdom is already established on earth and that the "King" is ruling it from Heaven.
If you believe that, then I have some oceanfront property for sale here in Arizona.
But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; Gal 2:7
Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the
revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, Rom 16:25
Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to my gospel: 2 Tim 2:8
According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust. 1 Tim 1:11
In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel. Rom 2:16
"Replacement Theology" is 4th Century Catholic Theology. Augustine of Hippo was its main proponent ("Saint Augustine").
And this Gospel of the Kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come. Mt 24:14
Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.
The "Four Spiritual Laws" (tract) makes no mention of a coming Kingdom,
it makes no mention of these things because they are unnecessary.
The Gospel of the Kingdom however, of necessity does.
Pink was dispy in his early years but like many others saw "the modern and pernicious error of Dispensationism" and not only left it, but wrote against it in his last days.
Brief bio here:
The Preacher That Nobody Wanted
...I've heard good things about Pink, but have yet to read any of his stuff myself. Going to have to look into the links this week.
They are very clear verses. They speak of a resurrection of the just and a resurrection of the unjust; not one but two resurrections. Your interpretation of that same passage is flawed. Jesus speaks of two resurrections in that same passage.
Make up your mind am I speaking in ABSOLUTES or UNCERTAIN BABBLE?Again you speak in absolutes, statements that you cannot prove and have no evidence for. Have you evidence that there is no church before Darby that did not believe in two resurrections? I don't believe you do. So stop with the uncertain babble. Back up your statements with evidence or don't make them.
You have proven nothing except you are devious in your responses.I have already proved you wrong once, and still you sputter out false statements. What a shame.
The Bible is my link!Read the link I gave you. Get an education!
http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/dispensation.htm
I'll quote from it again:
[/B][/SIZE][/FONT]
Jesus Christ is the First Resurrection and that is a fact.Christ is the "firstfruits of the resurrection."
Repeating Scripture and assuming they prove a pre-trib "snatching away" of the Church proves nothing except that people have fallen for Darbyism!When he comes again, believers will be raised to meet him in the air (the rapture) according to 1Thes. 4:16-18.
1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
--We will be caught up together to meet the Lord in the air. The Lord at this time does not come to earth, not to the Mount of Olives (Zech.7:14--does not split the mount), does not defeat the enemies of Israel, does not save Israel, does not come in the glory of His Father with the Holy Angels (Mark 8:38)
Rather, when he does come again, over 1,000 years later it will be with vengeance:
2 Thessalonians 1:7-10 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power; When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day.
--A completely different description as you can see.
He comes with his angels this time.
In flaming fire taking vengeance on those that do not obey the gospel.
Meting out everlasting destruction to these unbelievers.
The two scenes are very much different. They are a thousand years apart--just like the two resurrections are a thousand years apart.
I believe the reference to "Moody" is a reference to either Moody Bible Institute or Moody Publishing House. It has nothing to do with the author or the person. Surely you have heard of books like "Zondervan's Bible Atlas," but I don't think the author is "Zondervan."Good post RLB. You see in beameup exactly what I see. And of course Jesus Christ is reigning now. Where would we be if He were not?
And of course RLB, Mr DHK wants me to use the Moody Handbook to "eddicate" myself. Now I believe Moody was dispensational and have no idea whether the handbook is tainted or not. If I mention Baptist Confessions I am following the teaching of men rather than Scripture but then there is the good ole reliable Moody Handbook.![]()
And thus your ignorance.The Bible is my link!
There are two resurrections that Jesus spoke of, and neither one of them is His.Jesus Christ is the First Resurrection and that is a fact.
The Bible is my link!
Response posted by DHK
And thus your ignorance.
Jesus Christ is the First Resurrection and that is a fact.
There are two resurrections that Jesus spoke of, and neither one of them is His.
That sounds like you are questioning my Salvation DHK. As a moderator you should know that warrants banning. Shall I report you or are you man enough to report yourself?If you say that one of them is His, that leaves you only in the second one--the unjust. Is this what you are telling me? You can't be involved in two resurrections OR!
Repeating Scripture and assuming they prove a pre-trib "snatching away" of the Church proves nothing except that people have fallen for Darbyism!
They certainly cannot be used to support the so-called pre-trib "snatching away" of the Church. Neither you nor anyone who calls themselves a dispensationalist can provide a single passage of Scripture that teaches a pre-trib "snatching away" of the Church.Repeating yourself won't do any good to reconcile two passages of Scripture.
I gave you Scripture. You can't reconcile the two passages can you?
All you can do is mock and shout.
I repeat my earlier remarks to Bro. Bosley!BTW, the quote from the website is in bold and large fonts because that is the way it copies and pastes into the board, not because I deliberately put it that way. I just don't take the time to try and change everything back to smaller fonts.
And of course RLB, Mr DHK wants me to use the Moody Handbook to "eddicate" myself. Now I believe Moody was dispensational and have no idea whether the handbook is tainted or not. If I mention Baptist Confessions I am following the teaching of men rather than Scripture but then there is the good ole reliable Moody Handbook.![]()
John 5:28, 29
28. Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,
29. And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
Yes but the resurrections occur at the same time DHK, the HOUR in the which ALL shall HEAR his voice And shall come FORTH.
You can't slice and dice that in the typical manner of dispensational eisegesis, DHK!
Why? You would never have learned about "covenants" unless some book or some person would have taught you. Perhaps you learned it from a "link." Don't be so arrogant!Your response to my claiming the Bible as "My Link" speaks volumes about you DHK!
John 5:28-29 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.Are you denying that Jesus Christ is the First Resurrection? It appears so from your above response since Orthodox Christianity has long accepted that Scripture is Divinely inspired by God. The Apostle Paul tells us:
1 Corinthians 15:3-6
3. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4. And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
5. And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve:
6. After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep.
7. After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles.
8. And last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time.
We are speaking of "Because Christ rose and lives, we also shall rise and live eternally. He is the foundation and cause of our resurrection. Paul spends much of the rest of the chapter speaking of the resurrection of the dead, not Christ's resurrection.Now can you present any Scripture showing that any other dead person has been brought back to life with a glorified body like that of Jesus Christ and who did not die again?
As above I am showing you the fallacy of your argument, and how you change topics in mid air.That sounds like you are questioning my Salvation DHK. As a moderator you should know that warrants banning. Shall I report you or are you man enough to report yourself?
1 Thes.4:17-20 and 2:Thes.1:6-10. These passages of Scripture you cannot reconcile. You won't even try. Until you do why should I even listen to? Don't you believe the Scriptures?Repeating yourself won't do any good to reconcile two passages of Scripture.
I gave you Scripture. You can't reconcile the two passages can you?
All you can do is mock and shout.
Prove that they don't. I don't have to accept your word. Show from Scripture, the ones I gave you, that they are the same event or refrain from making false statements. Fair enough?They certainly cannot be used to support the so-called pre-trib "snatching away" of the Church. Neither you nor anyone who calls themselves a dispensationalist can provide a single passage of Scripture that teaches a pre-trib "snatching away" of the Church.
A contradiction from the statement you made at the beginning.I repeat my earlier remarks to Bro. Bosley!
And what is that supposed to prove.And I leave you with the following from an earlier post!
Why? You would never have learned about "covenants" unless some book or some person would have taught you. Perhaps you learned it from a "link." Don't be so arrogant!
Why? You would never have learned about "covenants" unless some book or some person would have taught you. Perhaps you learned it from a "link." Don't be so arrogant!
Didn't learn a thing about covenant's. I only learned that you are good with a search engine and like to post verses in bright red which is hard on the eyes.This is how you learn about Covenants. You read a book called the BIBLE!
Need I go on? There are about 200 more where those came from.
Didn't learn a thing about covenant's. I only learned that you are good with a search engine and like to post verses in bright red which is hard on the eyes.
That is not how you teach a person about covenants. And I highly doubt it if that is how you learned "covenantal theology," if indeed you understand any.
Try again to reconcile these two passages.Read the link I gave you.
http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/dispensation.htm
Christ is the "firstfruits of the resurrection."
When he comes again, believers will be raised to meet him in the air (the rapture) according to 1Thes. 4:16-18.
1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
--We will be caught up together to meet the Lord in the air. The Lord at this time does not come to earth, not to the Mount of Olives (Zech.7:14--does not split the mount), does not defeat the enemies of Israel, does not save Israel, does not come in the glory of His Father with the Holy Angels (Mark 8:38)
Rather, when he does come again, over 1,000 years later it will be with vengeance:
2 Thessalonians 1:7-10 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power; When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day.
--A completely different description as you can see.
He comes with his angels this time.
In flaming fire taking vengeance on those that do not obey the gospel.
Meting out everlasting destruction to these unbelievers.
The two scenes are very much different. They are a thousand years apart--just like the two resurrections are a thousand years apart.
14 pages of personal attacks, "you don't understand what dispensationalism/covenant theology is", ban ban ban, heresy, etc etc
John 5:28-29 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
--There are two resurrections mentioned here: one to life and one to damnation. If Christ is the resurrection of life, then you are of the one to damnation. I don't believe that. So, no; His resurrection is in a class of its own.
And thus your ignorance.
There are two resurrections that Jesus spoke of, and neither one of them is His.
If you say that one of them is His, that leaves you only in the second one--the unjust. Is this what you are telling me? You can't be involved in two resurrections OR!