Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You believe Catholics are categorically hellbound. That in and of itself is an example of bashing of persons.
That's been done. His claims of heresy and not truly being reformed have been posted, and to date, unsubstantiated. His bashing of persons is thereby established. At least you attempt to cite support for your position, albeit flawed (that a caltholic is categorically hellbound).
No, it boils down to a handful of holier-than-thou folks who don't know how to engage in civil and respectful discussion on the topic, taking issue with anyone who attempts to engage ehtm in said discussion.
I showed you clearly where you made false accusations about me.
No. I believe what I said was my church has some customs on Sunday mornings that Emergent churches use.
Translation: Reformed Baptis doesn't think he needs to have evidence when accusing someone, nor does he need to retract his position when it's discovered he made them in error.
The topic is the incessent need for some folks to be preoccupied with bashing catholics, and crying foul when anyone calls them on it.
Uh, of course I'm a Christian. I've never put up a single post which would remotely suggest otherwise.
I've said absolutely nothing of the sort.
No, I haven't.
At best, you appear to be a false judger of peoples' Christian faith.
Given the fact that you can't cite any place where I did so, yes, I say so.
Sir, I serve Jesus, I know Jesus, Jesus is a friend of mine. Sir, you're no Jesus.
Impossible. You couldn't have addressed what did nto exist.
That wasn't my response to his word. It was the response to your preconcieved notion that a person must adhere to your application of doctrine before being cosidered saved.
Translation: "Yes, I know I accused you of something falsely, but I'm not going to man up and acknowlege it".
How junior high.
Johnv said:
I worship Christ, not scripture. I never said it's not necessary to affirm the doctrines of scripture. You, however, continue to show your lack of understanding on the matter, given the fact that you were shown the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification by the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church, which reads, "Through Christ alone are we justified...", and you continue to misapply your own reasoning, as though it were scripture itself.
Well, you believe your application to be the same as scripture. You've failed to discern between the two.
Nice try, but the fact is you've been shown the Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification by the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church, where it says expressly that both bodies accept justification through Christ alone. The reason you refuse to accept it is because it causes your entire argument to fall apart.