The early church and baptism

[JSM17]

110-165 AD Martyr "As many as are persuaded and believe that what we teach and say is true, and undertake to be able to live accordingly, are instructed to pray and to entreat God with fasting, for the remission of their sins that are past, we praying and fasting with them. Then they are brought by us where there is water, and are regenerated in the same manner in which we were ourselves regenerated. For, in the name of God, the Father and Lord of the universe, and of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit, they then receive the washing with water. For Christ also said, 'Except ye be born again, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.' Now, that it is impossible for those who have once been born to enter into their mothers' wombs, is manifest to all... And for this we have learned from the apostles this reason. Since at our birth we were born without our own knowledge or choice, by our parents coming together, and were brought up in bad habits and wicked training; in order that we may not remain the children of necessity and of ignorance, but may become the children of choice and knowledge, and may obtain in the water the remission of sins formerly committed, there is pronounced over him who chooses to be born again, and has repented of his sins, the name of God the Father and Lord of the universe." (Justin Martyr, "First Apology," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 1, pg. 183)

110-165 AD Martyr The "Constitutions of the Holy Apostles" also refer to John 3:5. There, the one who refuses to be baptized is to be condemned as an unbeliever, partially on the basis of what Jesus told Nicodemus…. "He that, out of contempt, will not be baptized, shall be condemned as an unbeliever, and shall be reproached as ungrateful and foolish. For the Lord says: 'Except a man be baptized of water and of the Spirit, he shall by no means enter into the kingdom of heaven.' And again: 'He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved but he that believeth not shall be damned.'" (Justin Martyr "Constitutions of the Holy Apostles," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 7, pg. 456-457.)

110-165AD Martyr "there is no other way [to obtain God's promises] than this-to become acquainted with Christ, to be washed in the fountain spoken of by Isaiah for the remission of sins, and for the remainder, to live sinless lives." (Justin Martyr, Trypho chap. 44)

110-165AD Martyr "Those who are convinced that what we teach is true and who desire to live accordingly are instructed to fast and to pray to God for the remission of all their past sins. We also pray and fast with them. Then we bring them to a place where there is water, and they are regenerated in the same manner in which we ourselves were regenerated. They then receive the washing with water in the name of God (the Father and Lord of the universe) and of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit. For Christ said, 'Unless you are born again, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven"' [John 3:5]. (Justin First Apology chant 61)

115-188 THEOPHILUS "On the fifth day the living creatures which proceed from the waters were produced, through which also is revealed the manifold wisdom of God in these things; for who could count their multitude and various kinds? Moreover, the things proceeding from the waters were blessed by God, that this also might be a sign of men's being destined to receive repentance and remission of sins, through the water and laver of regeneration, as many as come to the truth, and are born again, and receive blessing from God." (Theophilus, "To Autolycus,", Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 2, pg. 101)

115AD Second Clement "For, if we do the will of Christ, we shall find rest; but if otherwise, then nothing shall deliver us from eternal punishment, if we should disobey His commandments. . . . [W]ith what confidence shall we, if we keep not our baptism pure and undefiled, enter into the kingdom of God? Or who shall be our advocate, unless we be found having holy and righteous works?' (Second Clement 6:7)

120-205 AD IRENAEUS "As we are lepers in sin, we are made clean from our old transgressions by means of the sacred water and the invocation of the Lord. We are thus spiritually regenerated as newborn infants, even as the Lord has declared: 'Except a man be born again through water and the Spirit, he shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.'" Irenaeus, "Fragments From Lost Writings", no. 34, Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 1, pg. 574)

120-205 AD IRENAEUS "This class of men have been instigated by Satan to a denial of that baptism which is regeneration to God, and thus to a renunciation of the whole faith." (Against Heresies, bk. 1, chap. 21, sec. 1, Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 1, pg. 345.)

140-230 AD TERTULLIAN "After the world had been hereupon set in order through its elements, when inhabitants were given it, 'the waters' were the first to receive the precept 'to bring forth living creatures.' Water was the first to produce that which had life, that it might be no wonder in baptism if waters know how to give life." (Tertullian, "On Baptism," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3, page 670)

140-230 AD Tertullian "Baptism itself is a corporal act by which we are plunged into the water, while its effect is spiritual, in that we are freed from our sins" (Baptism 7:2).

140-230 AD TERTULLIAN "But they roll back an objection from that apostle himself, in that he said, 'For Christ sent me not to baptize;' as if by this argument baptism were done away! For if so, why did he baptize Gaius, and Crispus, and the house of Stephanas? However, even if Christ had not sent him to baptize, yet He had given other apostles the precept to baptize. But these words were written to the Corinthians in regard of the circumstances of that particular time; seeing that schisms and dissensions were agitated among them, while one attributes everything to Paul, another to Apollos. For which reason the 'peacemaking' apostle, for fear he should seem to claim all gifts for himself, says that he had been sent 'not to baptize, but to preach.' For preaching is the prior thing, baptizing the posterior. Therefore the preaching came first: but I think baptizing withal was lawful to him to whom preaching was." (Tertullian, "On Baptism," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3, pg. 676)

140-230 AD TERTULLIAN "Happy is our sacrament of water, in that, by washing away the sins of our early blindness, we are set free and admitted into eternal life! A treatise on this matter will not be superfluous; instructing not only such as are just becoming formed in the faith... The consequence is, that a viper of the Cainite heresy, lately conversant in this quarter, has carried away a great number with her most venomous doctrine, making it her first aim to destroy baptism. Which is quite in accordance with nature; for vipers and asps and serpents themselves generally do affect arid and waterless places. But we, little fishes after the example of our ikhthus, Jesus Christ, are born in water, nor have we safety in any other way than by permanently abiding in water; so that most monstrous creature, who had no right to teach even sound doctrine, knew full well how to kill the little fishes, by taking them away from the water!" (On Baptism, Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3, pg. 669.)

140-230 AD TERTULLIAN "How mighty is the grace of water, in the sight of God and His Christ, for the confirmation of baptism! Never is Christ without water: if, that is, He is Himself baptized in water; inaugurates in water the first rudimentary displays of his power, when invited to the wedding; invites the thirsty, when He makes a discourse, to Himself being living water; approves, when teaching concerning love, among works of charity, the cup of water offered to a poor child; recruits His strength at a well; walks over the water; willingly crosses the sea; ministers water to his disciples. Onward even to the passion does the witness of baptism last: while He is being surrendered to the cross, water intervenes; witness Pilate's hands: when He is wounded, forth from His side bursts water; witness the soldier's lance!... True and stable faith is baptized with water, unto salvation; pretended and weak faith is baptized with fire, unto judgment." (Tertullian, "On Baptism," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3, pg. 673, 674)

140-230 AD TERTULLIAN "The prescript is laid down that 'without baptism, salvation is attainable by none' chiefly on the ground of that declaration of the Lord, who says, 'Unless one be born of water, he hath not life.'" (On Baptism, Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3, pg. 674-675)

140-230 AD TERTULLIAN "What more disgraceful than immodesties? If, moreover, even from a 'brother' who 'walketh idly' he warns the Thessalonians to withdraw themselves, how much more withal from a fornicator! For these are the deliberate judgments of Christ, 'loving the Church,' who 'hath delivered Himself up for her, that He may sanctify her (purifying her utterly by the laver of water) in the word, that He may present the Church to Himself glorious, not having stain or wrinkle' - of course after the laver - 'but that she may be holy and without reproach; thereafter, to wit, being 'without wrinkle' as a virgin, 'without stain' (of fornication) as a spouse, 'without disgrace' (of vileness), as having been 'utterly purified.'" (Tertullian, "On Modesty," 217 AD, Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4, pg. 94)

 

[JSM17]

140-230 AD TERTULLIAN This is in agreement to the context of the words of John the Baptist when he prophesied of the baptism of fire. Referring to Jesus, John said, "I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. His winnowing fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clean out His threshing floor, and gather His wheat into the barn; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire" (comment on Matthew 3:11-12).

150-200 AD CLEMENT "Being baptized, we are illuminated; illuminated, we become sons; being made sons, we are made perfect; being made perfect, we are made immortal... This work is variously called grace, and illumination, and perfection, and washing. Washing, by which we cleanse away our sins; grace, by which the penalties accruing to transgressions are remitted; and illumination, by which that holy light of salvation is beheld, that is, by which we see God clearly." (Clement of Alexandria, "The Instructor," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 2, pg. 215)

150-200 AD CLEMENT "But when the time began to draw near that what was wanting in the Mosaic institutions should be supplied, as we have said, and that the Prophet should appear, of whom he had foretold that He should warn them by the mercy of God to cease from sacrificing; lest haply they might suppose that on the cessation of sacrifice there was no remission of sins for them He instituted baptism by water amongst them, in which they might be absolved from all their sins on the invocation of His name." (Clement, "Recognitions of Clement," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 8, pg. 88)

150-200 AD CLEMENT "Now God has ordered every one who worships Him to be sealed by baptism; but if you refuse, and obey your own will rather than God's, you are doubtless contrary and hostile to His will. But you will perhaps say, 'What does the baptism of water contribute towards the worship of God?' In the first place, because that which hath pleased God is fulfilled. In the second place, because, when you are regenerated and born again of water and of God, the frailty of your former birth, which you have through men, is cut off, and so at length you shall be able to attain salvation; but otherwise it is impossible. For thus hath the true prophet testified to us with an oath: 'Verily I say to you, That unless a man is born again of water, he shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.' Therefore make haste; for there is in these waters a certain power of mercy which was borne upon them at the beginning, and acknowledges those who are baptized under the name of the threefold sacrament, and rescues them from future punishments, presenting as a gift to God the souls that are consecrated by baptism. Betake yourselves therefore to these waters, for they alone can quench the violence of the future fire; and he who delays to approach to them, it is evident that the idol of unbelief remains in him, and by it he is prevented from hastening to the waters which confer salvation." (Clement, "Recognitions of Clement," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 8, pg. 155)

150-200 AD Clement "This work is variously called grace, and illumination, and perfection, and washing. Washing, by which we cleanse away our sins. Grace, by which the penalties of our sins are canceled. And illumination, by which that holy light of salvation is beheld, that is, by which we see God clearly." (Clement Instructor bk. 1, chap. 6)

150-200 AD CLEMENT "We are washed from all our sins, and are no longer entangled in evil. This is the one grace of illumination, that our characters are not the same as before our washing... In the same way, therefore, we also, repenting of our sins, renouncing our iniquities, purified by baptism, speed back to the eternal light, children to the Father." (Clement of Alexandria, "The Instructor," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 2, pg. 216-217.)

150-200 AD CLEMENT "When he had given them these and such like precepts, he made proclamation to the people, saying: 'Since I have resolved to stay three months with you, if any one desires it, let him be baptized; that, stripped of his former evils, he may for the future, in consequence of his own conduct, become heir of heavenly blessings, as a reward for his good actions." (Cleme

 

[JSM17]

181 AD Theophilus of Antioch "Moreover, those things which were created from the waters were blessed by God, so that this might also be a sign that men would at a future time receive repentance and remission of sins through water and the bath of regeneration all who proceed to the truth and are born again and receive a blessing from God" (To Autolycus 12:16).

190 AD Irenaeus of Lyons "`And [Naaman] dipped himself . . . seven times in the Jordan' [2 Kgs. 5:14]. It was not for nothing that Naaman of old, when suffering from leprosy, was purified upon his being baptized, but [this served] as an indication to us. For as we are lepers in sin, we are made clean, by means of the sacred water and the invocation of the Lord, from our old transgressions, being spiritually regenerated as new-born babes, even as the Lord has declared: `Except a man be born again through water and the Spirit, he shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven'" (Fragment 34).

200 AD CYPRIAN "But what a thing it is, to assert and contend that they who are not born in the Church can be the sons of God! For the blessed apostle sets forth and proves that baptism is that wherein the old man dies and the new man is born, saying, 'He saved us by the washing of regeneration.' But if regeneration is in the washing, that is, in baptism, how can heresy, which is not the spouse of Christ, generate sons to God by Christ?" (Cyprian, "The Epistles of Cyprian," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 388)

200 AD Cyprian of Carthage "While I was lying in darkness . . . I thought it indeed difficult and hard to believe . . . that divine mercy was promised for my salvation, so that anyone might be born again and quickened unto a new life by the laver of the saving water, he might put off what he had been before, and, although the structure of the body remained, he might change himself in soul and mind. . . . But afterwards, when the stain of my past life had been washed away by means of the water of rebirth, a light from above poured itself upon my chastened and now pure heart; afterwards, through the Spirit which is breathed from heaven, a second birth made of me a new man" (To Donatus 3)

200 AD HERMAS "And I said, 'I heard, sir, some teachers maintain that there is no other repentance than that which takes place, when we descended into the water and received remission of our former sin.' He said to me, 'That was sound doctrine which you heard; for that is really the case.'" (Hermas, "The Shepherd," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 2, pg. 22)

200-258 AD CARTHAGE "Aurelius of Utica said: Since the apostle says that we are not to communicate with other people's sins, what else does he do but communicate with other people's sins, who holds communion with heretics without the Church's baptism? And therefore I judge that heretics must be baptized, that they may receive forgiveness of their sins; and thus communion may be had with them." ("The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 569.)

200-258 AD CARTHAGE "Caecilius of Bilta said: I know only one baptism in the Church, and none out of the Church. This one will be here, where there is the true hope and the certain faith. For thus it is written: 'One faith, one hope, one baptism;' not among heretics, where there is no hope, and the faith is false, where all things are carried on by lying." (The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian, September, 258 AD, Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 565)

200-258 AD CARTHAGE "Marcellus of Zama said: Since sins are not remitted saved in the baptism of the Church, he who does not baptize a heretic holds communion with a sinner." ("The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian,", Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 570)

200-258 AD CARTHAGE "Nicomedes of Segermae said: My opinion is this, that heretics coming to the Church should be baptized, for the reason that among sinners without they can obtain no remission of sins. ("The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 567)

200-258 AD CARTHAGE "Novatus of Thamugada said: Although we know that all the Scriptures give witness concerning the saving baptism, still we ought to declare our faith, that heretics and schismatics who come to the Church, and appear to have been falsely baptized, ought to be baptized in the everlasting fountain; and therefore, according to the testimony of the Scriptures, and according to the decree of our colleagues, men of most holy memory, that all schismatics and heretics who are converted to the Church must be baptized; and moreover, that those who appeared to have been ordained must be received among lay people. (The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian, September, 258 AD, Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 565)

200-258 AD CARTHAGE "Victor of Gor said: Since sins are not remitted save in the baptism of the Church, he who admits a heretic to communion without baptism does two things against reason: he does not cleanse the heretics, and he befouls the Christians." ("The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 568)

200-258 AD CARTHAGE "Victoricus of Thabraca said: If heretics are allowed to baptize and to give remission of sins, wherefore do we brand them with infamy and call them heretics?" ("The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 568)

200-258 AD CARTHAGE Dativus of Badis said: We, as far as in us lies, do not hold communion with heretics, unless they have been baptized in the Church, and have received remission of their sins." ("The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 567)

200-258 AD CARTHAGE Felix of Bagai said: As, when the blind leads the blind, they fall together into the ditch; so, when the heretic baptizes a heretic, they fall together into death. And therefore a heretic must be baptized and made alive, lest we who are alive should hold communion with the dead. ("The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 567)

200-258 AD CARTHAGE Nemesianus of Thubunae said: That the baptism which heretics and schismatics bestow is not the true one, is everywhere declared in the Holy Scriptures, since their very leading men are false Christs and false prophets, as the Lord says by Solomon: 'He who trusteth in that which is false. he feedeth the winds...' And in the Gospel our Lord Jesus Christ spoke with His divine voice, saying, 'Except a man be born again of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.' This is the Spirit which from the beginning was borne over the waters; for neither can the Spirit operate without the water, nor the water without the Spirit." ("The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 566.)

200-258 AD CYPRIAN "But as often as water is named alone in the Holy Scriptures, baptism is referred to, as we see intimated in Isaiah: 'Remember not,' says he, 'the former things, and consider not the things of old. Behold, I will do a new thing, which shall now spring forth; and ye shall know it. I will even make a way in the wilderness, and rivers in the dry place, to give drink to my elected people, my people whom I have purchased, that they might show forth my praise.' There God foretold by the prophet, that among the nations, in places which previously had been dry, rivers should afterwards flow plenteously, and should provide water for the elected people of God, that is, for those who were made sons of God by the generation of baptism.... Christ... cries and says, 'If any man thirst, let him come and drink. He that believeth on me, as the Scripture saith, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.' And that it might be more evident that the Lord is speaking there, not of the cup, but of baptism, the Scripture adds, saying, 'But this spake He of the Spirit, which they that believe on Him should receive.' For by baptism the Holy Spirit is received... As also, in another place, the Lord speaks to the Samaritan woman, saying, 'Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again; but whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him, shall not thirst for ever.' By which is also signified the very baptism of saving water, which indeed is once received, and is not again repeated.." (Cyprian, "The Epistles of Cyprian," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 360)

200-258 AD CYPRIAN "But if the baptism of heretics can have the regeneration of the second birth, those who are baptized among them must be counted not heretics, but children of God. For the second birth, which occurs in baptism, begets sons of God." (Cyprian, "The Epistles of Cyprian," Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, pg. 393)

 

[JSM17]

419 AD Augustine "Those who, though they have not received the washing of regeneration, die for the confession of Christ--it avails them just as much for the forgiveness of their sins as if they had been washed in the sacred font of baptism. For he that said, `If anyone is not reborn of water and the Spirit, he will not enter the kingdom of heaven,' made an exception for them in that other statement in which he says no less generally, `Whoever confesses me before men, I too will confess him before my Father, who is in heaven'" [Matt. 10:32] (The City of God 13:7).

75 AD The Letter of Barnabas "Regarding [baptism], we have the evidence of Scripture that Israel would refuse to accept the washing which confers the remission of sins and would set up a substitution of their own instead [Jer. 22:13; Is. 16:1Letter of Barnabas 11:1)

80 AD Hermas "'I have heard, sir,' said I, 'from some teacher, that there is no other repentance except that which took place when we went down into the water and obtained the remission of our former sins.' He said to me, 'You have heard rightly, for so it is'" (The Shepherd 4:3:1)

203 AD Tertullian "[N]o one can attain salvation without baptism, especially in view of the declaration of the Lord, who says, `Unless a man shall be born of water, he shall not have life'" (Baptism 12:1).

215 AD Hippolytus "And the bishop shall lay his hand upon them [the newly baptized], invoking and saying: 'O Lord God, who did count these worthy of deserving the forgiveness of sins by the laver of regeneration, make them worthy to be filled with your Holy Spirit and send upon them thy grace [in confirmation], that they may serve you according to your will" (The Apostolic Tradition 22:1).

217 AD Hippolytus "The Father of immortality sent the immortal Son and Word into the world, who came to man in order to wash him with water and the Spirit; and He, begetting us again to incorruption of soul and body, breathed into us the Spirit of life, and endued us with an incorruptible panoply. If, therefore, man has become immortal, he will also be God. And if he is made God by water and the Holy Spirit after the regeneration of the laver he is found to be also joint-heir with Christ after the resurrection from the dead. Wherefore I preach to this effect: Come, all ye kindreds of the nations, to the immortality of the baptism" (Discourse on the Holy Theophany 8).

 

[OldRegular]

Can you show from Scripture that all the Apostles were baptized in water?

 

[Zenas]

Can you show from Scripture that all the Apostles were baptized in water?

No but I have a hunch Jesus baptized His disciples and this is what John is referring to in John 3:22. In John 4:2 it says Jesus was not baptizing but His disciples were, which means John 3:22 is wrong or . . . Jesus first baptized His disciples and then turned that duty over to them. We can't prove this to be true but I think it is implied in these passages.

 

[billwald]

110 AD? The side that wins the war writes the history books. In the prior generation the Jewish priests and sadducces (sp?) were killed, the Jerusalem Church and Church Council were eliminated. The Pharisees became the rabbis and Paul's sect took control of Christianity.

 

[DeafPosttrib]

JS17,

Wow. I never read their Early Fathers during in the First and Second Century Period prior St. Augustine and founded of Roman Catholic.

I do truly believe that Early Fathers do believed salvation is conditional by base upon obedience.

Clearly, throughout whole in the Bible teaching us that we can have eternal life, by obey the Gospel. Well, as in Hebrews chapter 11 is clear telling us that, all O.T. saints were saved by their faith through obedience. So, therefore, salvation is conditional.

In Christ
Rev. 22:20 -Amen!

 

[JSM17]

Can you show from Scripture that all the Apostles were baptized in water?

Luke 7:29-30

29 And when all the people heard Him, even the tax collectors justified God, having been baptized with the baptism of John.

30 But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the will of God for themselves, not having been baptized by him.
NKJV

Every Apostle that was with Jesus submitted to the baptism that John preached, if they did not they rejected the will of God for themselves.

Luke 3:3

3 And he went into all the region around the Jordan, preaching a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins,NKJV

John's baptism was in water, therfore the Apostles were baptized in water, they received the H.S. on the day of Pentecost just as it was foretold in the O.T.

 

[MorganT]

Luke 7:29-30

29 And when all the people heard Him, even the tax collectors justified God, having been baptized with the baptism of John.

30 But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the will of God for themselves, not having been baptized by him.
NKJV

Every Apostle that was with Jesus submitted to the baptism that John preached, if they did not they rejected the will of God for themselves.

Luke 3:3

3 And he went into all the region around the Jordan, preaching a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins,NKJV

John's baptism was in water, therfore the Apostles were baptized in water, they received the H.S. on the day of Pentecost just as it was foretold in the O.T.

Act 10:42-44 And He commanded us to preach to the people, and to testify that it is He who was ordained of God to be the Judge of the living and the dead. (43) All the Prophets give witness to Him, that through His name whoever believes in Him shall receive remission of sins. (44) While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all those hearing the Word.

Now were is Baptism mentioned at in Acts 10 Ill tell you were its mentined at its mentioned after they believed and already had the Holy Spirit.

Act 10:45-48 And those of the circumcision, who believed (as many as came with Peter), were astonished because the gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out on the nations also. (46) For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God. Then Peter answered, (47) Can anyone forbid water that these, who have received the Holy Ghost as well as we, should not be baptized? (48) And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then they begged him to stay certain days.

Its plain to see in scripture were they were already saved because they already had the Holy Spirit within them before they were baptized.

 

[Tom Butler]

Can you show from Scripture that all the Apostles were baptized in water?

When the disciples met in the upper room to choose a replacement for Judas, Peter laid out three qualifications:

Acts 1
21 Wherefore, of these men who have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us
22 Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, must one be ordained with us as a witness of his resurrection...

I read those qualificatioins as not a new believer, baptized by John (who always baptized in water) and must have seen the risen Christ.

 

[JSM17]

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSM17
Luke 7:29-30

29 And when all the people heard Him, even the tax collectors justified God, having been baptized with the baptism of John.

30 But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the will of God for themselves, not having been baptized by him.
NKJV

Every Apostle that was with Jesus submitted to the baptism that John preached, if they did not they rejected the will of God for themselves.

Luke 3:3

3 And he went into all the region around the Jordan, preaching a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins,NKJV

John's baptism was in water, therfore the Apostles were baptized in water, they received the H.S. on the day of Pentecost just as it was foretold in the O.T.

Morgan T said:
Act 10:42-44 And He commanded us to preach to the people, and to testify that it is He who was ordained of God to be the Judge of the living and the dead. (43) All the Prophets give witness to Him, that through His name whoever believes in Him shall receive remission of sins. (44) While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all those hearing the Word.

Now were is Baptism mentioned at in Acts 10 Ill tell you were its mentined at its mentioned after they believed and already had the Holy Spirit.

Act 10:45-48 And those of the circumcision, who believed (as many as came with Peter), were astonished because the gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out on the nations also. (46) For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God. Then Peter answered, (47) Can anyone forbid water that these, who have received the Holy Ghost as well as we, should not be baptized? (48) And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then they begged him to stay certain days.

Its plain to see in scripture were they were already saved because they already had the Holy Spirit within them before they were baptized

.

My post was in response to oldregular's question:

Can you show from Scripture that all the Apostles were baptized in water?

 

[JSM17]

Morgan T said:

Act 10:42-44 And He commanded us to preach to the people, and to testify that it is He who was ordained of God to be the Judge of the living and the dead. (43) All the Prophets give witness to Him, that through His name whoever believes in Him shall receive remission of sins. (44) While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all those hearing the Word.

Now were is Baptism mentioned at in Acts 10 Ill tell you were its mentined at its mentioned after they believed and already had the Holy Spirit.

Act 10:45-48 And those of the circumcision, who believed (as many as came with Peter), were astonished because the gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out on the nations also. (46) For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God. Then Peter answered, (47) Can anyone forbid water that these, who have received the Holy Ghost as well as we, should not be baptized? (48) And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then they begged him to stay certain days.

Its plain to see in scripture were they were already saved because they already had the Holy Spirit within them before they were baptized

Using this logic (or your logic) I could go to Acts 19 and declare that they (12 rebaptized men) were not saved until after baptism because they did recieve the Holy Spirit until Paul laid his hands on them and then they spoke in tongues. Since you say Cornelius was saved because the Holy Spirit came upon him.

I find it interesting that Peter when he gives his story to those in Jerusalem, Luke makes sure that the reader understands that his account is given in an orderly sequence (11:4), which is imporant if you consider that Peter was to go to the house of Cornelius and speak word in which they could be saved by (11:14), yet as Peter BEGINS to speak the H.S. fell upon them.

Why did the H.S. fall upon them? Why was it just like when He (Spirit) fell upon the Apostles in the beginning? Were the Apostles saved only when the Holy Spirit fell upon them, or were they saved before that time?

Maybe the case of those in Samaria is a better example. The Samaritans had believed and were even baptized, yet they had to wait till John and Peter came down from Jerusalem to lay their hands on them.
So with your logic they were not saved until the Holy Spirit came upon them, which was after they believed (which most of you say they were saved already), which was after they were baptized ( which most say is a sign of already being saved), yet now your saying that they were not saved because the Holy Spirit was not in them until the Apostles came down and laid hands on them.

One thing is for sure, New birth, water and spirit.

I would like to hear someone explain to me why all these account of conversion are different when it comes to the H.S.?

 

[TCGreek]

JSM17,

The early church believed in one Bishop, too.

And don't forget infant baptism.

 

[JSM17]

JSM17,

The early church believed in one Bishop, too.

And don't forget infant baptism.

I certainly was not advocating that these people were inspired as scripture is and by no means hold them as authority no more than modern day writers, all I was trying to show as that there was ideas connected with earlier writers that shows that baptism had meaning outside of todays "reformation" movement.

People like polcarp who was a student of the Apostle of John should have had a good understanding about certain issues.

I do not deny that even in scripture there were those who already were teaching things contrary to the Gospel, so there is no doubt that it would continue til this very day.

But even the word's of our Lord seem to be ignored by the teachings of mere men.

I am interested in hearing a response to my last post.

 

[TCGreek]

I certainly was not advocating that these people were inspired as scripture is and by no means hold them as authority no more than modern day writers, all I was trying to show as that there was ideas connected with earlier writers that shows that baptism had meaning outside of todays "reformation" movement.

People like polcarp who was a student of the Apostle of John should have had a good understanding about certain issues.

I do not deny that even in scripture there were those who already were teaching things contrary to the Gospel, so there is no doubt that it would continue til this very day.

But even the word's of our Lord seem to be ignored by the teachings of mere men.

I am interested in hearing a response to my last post.

JSM17,

You believe that a person must be baptized in water to be saved. Most of us don't.

You're not the first to gather all these data to win us over.

And you will not be the last.

Simply put, a person is saved by faith in Jesus Christ apart from water baptism.

You're too dependent on human logic.

Scripture is neither modern nor postmodern.

 

[Zenas]

When the disciples met in the upper room to choose a replacement for Judas, Peter laid out three qualifications:

Acts 1
21 Wherefore, of these men who have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us
22 Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, must one be ordained with us as a witness of his resurrection...

I read those qualificatioins as not a new believer, baptized by John (who always baptized in water) and must have seen the risen Christ.

I disagree. Peter here was saying that they must choose one who had been with them from the time Jesus was baptized until He was taken up. When I first read your post, I thought you were right. Then I read the scripture you cited carefully and concluded that this is not evidence the apostles were baptized by John. I haven't found any scripture that proves who baptized the apostles but I will for the time being hold to my theory that it was Jesus in John 3:22.

 

[Tom Butler]

We do know that Andrew (and probably John) were disciples of John the Baptist who left John to follow Jesus. Conclusion: they were baptized by the Baptist. Andrew brought brother Cephas to Jesus and identified him as the Messiah. Possible: Peter had been baptized by the Baptist as well.

It is true that the scriptures are silent in this area, except for Andrew. And they are also silent with regard to any further baptism required of Andrew.

But I do find it interesting that the baptism of repentance is not mentioned in the Old Testament. The first time it's mentioned in the NT is in connection with JTB. It would seem reasonable to speculate that if the disciples Jesus chose had been baptized by anybody, they were baptized by John the Baptist.

That said, this is not a hill on which i would die.

 

[MorganT]

Morgan T said:


Using this logic (or your logic) I could go to Acts 19 and declare that they (12 rebaptized men) were not saved until after baptism because they did recieve the Holy Spirit until Paul laid his hands on them and then they spoke in tongues. Since you say Cornelius was saved because the Holy Spirit came upon him.

I find it interesting that Peter when he gives his story to those in Jerusalem, Luke makes sure that the reader understands that his account is given in an orderly sequence (11:4), which is imporant if you consider that Peter was to go to the house of Cornelius and speak word in which they could be saved by (11:14), yet as Peter BEGINS to speak the H.S. fell upon them.

Why did the H.S. fall upon them? Why was it just like when He (Spirit) fell upon the Apostles in the beginning? Were the Apostles saved only when the Holy Spirit fell upon them, or were they saved before that time?

Maybe the case of those in Samaria is a better example. The Samaritans had believed and were even baptized, yet they had to wait till John and Peter came down from Jerusalem to lay their hands on them.
So with your logic they were not saved until the Holy Spirit came upon them, which was after they believed (which most of you say they were saved already), which was after they were baptized ( which most say is a sign of already being saved), yet now your saying that they were not saved because the Holy Spirit was not in them until the Apostles came down and laid hands on them.

One thing is for sure, New birth, water and spirit.

I would like to hear someone explain to me why all these account of conversion are different when it comes to the H.S.?

Well why did Paul say that he was glad that he had not baptized very many people if that is what it took to save them. Paul says that he was called to preach the gospel

1Co 1:10-18 But I exhort you, brothers, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing and that there be no divisions among you; but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment. (11) For it has been declared to me concerning you, my brothers, by those of Chloe, that there are contentions among you. (12) But I say this, that every one of you says, I am of Paul, and I of Apollos, and I of Cephas, and I of Christ. (13) Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you, or were you baptized in the name of Paul? (14) I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius, (15) lest any should say that I had baptized in my own name. (16) And I also baptized the household of Stephanas. Besides these, I do not know if I baptized any other. (17) For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel; not in wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect. (18) For the preaching of the cross is foolishness to those being lost, but to us being saved, it is the power of God.

Baptism is obiedence to the word after salvation, its not the way to the cross for salvation.

Act 14:21-23 And preaching the gospel to that city, and having made many disciples, they returned to Lystra and Iconium and Antioch, (22) confirming the souls of the disciples, calling on them to continue in the faith and that through much tribulation we must enter into the kingdom of God. (23) And having hand-picked elders for them in every church, and had prayed with fastings, they commended them to the Lord into whom they believed.

Why do you reckon in verse 23 it says nothing about in whom they were baptized, it only says believed.

Act 15:35 Also Paul and Barnabas continued in Antioch, teaching and preaching the gospel, the Word of the Lord, with many others also.

Why do you reckon that verse 35 says nothing about them baptizing on teaching and preaching.

Act 16:14-15 And a certain woman named Lydia heard us, a seller of purple of the city of Thyatira, who worshiped God; whose heart the Lord opened, so that she attended to the things which were spoken by Paul. (15) And when she was baptized, she and her household, she begged us, saying, If you have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come into my house and stay. And she constrained us.

We see that Lydia worshiped God and her heart was opened by the Lord, and THEN she was baptized, because she was obiedent to the word, not in order to receive it.

Now lets look at this next scripture closely now.
Act 16:30-33 And leading them outside, he said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? (31) And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved, and your household. (32) And they spoke the Word of the Lord to him, and to all who were in his household. (33) And taking them in that hour of the night, he washed from their stripes. And he was baptized, he and all his, immediately.

The jailer first ask what to do in order to be saved and he was answered Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved then after he was saved they baptized them immediately and I have no problem with people being baptized immediately as long as they know that its an act of obiedence and not an act that will save them.

You see, Im not debating that one should not be baptized, Im debating the reason one should be baptized, JSM17 says that one is not saved until baptism and I say that one is saved thru Faith and is baptized as an act of obiedence.
:tonofbricks:

 

[JSM17]

Using this logic (or your logic) I could go to Acts 19 and declare that they (12 rebaptized men) were not saved until after baptism because they did recieve the Holy Spirit until Paul laid his hands on them and then they spoke in tongues. Since you say Cornelius was saved because the Holy Spirit came upon him.

I find it interesting that Peter when he gives his story to those in Jerusalem, Luke makes sure that the reader understands that his account is given in an orderly sequence (11:4), which is imporant if you consider that Peter was to go to the house of Cornelius and speak word in which they could be saved by (11:14), yet as Peter BEGINS to speak the H.S. fell upon them.

Why did the H.S. fall upon them? Why was it just like when He (Spirit) fell upon the Apostles in the beginning? Were the Apostles saved only when the Holy Spirit fell upon them, or were they saved before that time?

Maybe the case of those in Samaria is a better example. The Samaritans had believed and were even baptized, yet they had to wait till John and Peter came down from Jerusalem to lay their hands on them.
So with your logic they were not saved until the Holy Spirit came upon them, which was after they believed (which most of you say they were saved already), which was after they were baptized ( which most say is a sign of already being saved), yet now your saying that they were not saved because the Holy Spirit was not in them until the Apostles came down and laid hands on them.

One thing is for sure, New birth, water and spirit.

I would like to hear someone explain to me why all these account of conversion are different when it comes to the H.S.?

I would really like to here Morgan t response to the question I posed above.