The first Sikh sheriff's deputy was fatally shot in the head on Friday

[Benjamin]

I did not see that suggestion in the article, would you point it out to us?

If you can’t see or be honest about where they were trying to go with that story, sorry, I can’t help you. I really don’t think you would admit it no matter how obvious unless they directly confessed it and spelled out their intent and then you’d still attempt to defend the narrative because, obviously, you are into the same game as evidenced by your singling out this selection to Op this particular event.

I should just leave it there but, 1st, my objective opinion is based on measurements and observations of content such as CNN’s leading the story with noting he wore the turban and repeating that theme while neglecting to provide the information of the criminal being wanted for parole violation which would tend to establish the true motive as other than racial. How obvious can you get? 2nd, Other honest news agencies not commonly known for these types of agendas, like CNN, seemed to have no problem revealing the information that would point to motive being other than racial, which when used as a comparison, again, one would have to have a blind eye or be dishonest not to recognize the failure of CNN to present the facts along with their many repeated references to the religion of the slain officer which exposes their well-known agendas to invent such narratives.

As for their "narrative," I think that's only in your head.

If you’d like a blatant example of the narrative which demonstrates where this story is heading (to invent the suggestion of racism) your own words from within your head expose this underlying message to be brought forth exactly as I have alluded to:

They see a turban or head covering and they assume that the person is evil and/or they mock that person's head covering. These attitudes, especially if they are propagated in a community or peer group, can eventually lead to violence by less stable people.

We see here after you began with this OP you wasted no time going down the road of suggesting racism as the motive, yet while claiming you don't see the underlying agenda to lead into this narrative.

I'm not buying that you don't see CNN's unspoken intent anymore than I would believe that you don't and didn't thrive on feeding into it when you started this Op. I'm sure we'll have to agree to disagree as I'm done chasing your rabbit.

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

Agree 100 %. Sikhs, as a moderator pointed out above, have long been British allies in India and elsewhere. They fought in WW I & WW II with the allies against Germany. Sikhs are noted for their bravery in battle and man for man won more combat medals than the British themselves in WW I. Every able-bodied man receives military training.

We have many Sikhs in Indianapolis. I have worked with them in various warehouses. They are good workers and very friendly. They have a Golden Temple in Punjab and one told me that he had been there. It is a pleasure to be around them. I have even patronized a restaurant that they have near my house. Not all of them wear a turban.

Or have beards

 

[Baptist Believer]

If you can’t see or be honest about where they were trying to go with that story, sorry, I can’t help you. I really don’t think you would admit it no matter how obvious unless they directly confessed it and spelled out their intent and then you’d still attempt to defend the narrative because, obviously, you are into the same game as evidenced by your singling out this selection to Op this particular event.

So you claim that the article was designed to make people think the wearing of the turban was the cause of the officer being shot, yet when I ask you to actually show that from the article, you accuse me of being dishonest... That's irrational.

I should just leave it there but, 1st, my objective opinion is based on measurements and observations of content such as CNN’s leading the story with noting he wore the turban...

They did it because that was they thing he was known for in Texas and beyond. If a minor public figure dies, you would expect a media outlet to tell its readers something notable about their career that might have previously brought them to public attention. That's what happening here.

...and repeating that theme while neglecting to provide the information of the criminal being wanted for parole violation which would tend to establish the true motive as other than racial.

(1) You are the one who jumped to the conclusion that the motive might be racial. No one around here said anything of the sort, nor did the article. (2) I don't think the man charged has stated his true motive, but it is indeed likely that he did not want to return to jail.

How obvious can you get?

It is not obvious at all. It never occurred to me that there might be a racial component. I don’t usually assume there is a racial component to the stories I read unless it is explicit.

2nd, Other honest news agencies not commonly known for these types of agendas, like CNN, seemed to have no problem revealing the information that would point to motive being other than racial, which when used as a comparison, again, one would have to have a blind eye or be dishonest not to recognize the failure of CNN to present the facts along with their many repeated references to the religion of the slain officer which exposes their well-known agendas to invent such narratives.

They were focusing on the officer, his notability (Sikh who wore turban on duty), and his faith community. They were not speculating on the motives of the murderer. You are simply using your bias toward CNN to place an interpretation on the story that does not seem to be there.

If you’d like a blatant example of the narrative which demonstrates where this story is heading (to invent the suggestion of racism) your own words from within your head expose this underlying message to be brought forth exactly as I have alluded to...

I am specifically responding to a person who was just mocking a controversial political figure's head covering, repeatedly calling her headcovering a "diaper" in another thread. Even in that thread, the issue is not necessarily race. My motives for sharing the story can be found here, and they have nothing to do with racism.

We see here after you began with this OP you wasted no time going down the road of suggesting racism as the motive, yet while claiming you don't see the underlying agenda to lead into this narrative.

What I'm referring to is the well-known problem of Sikhs being confused with Muslims -- that's not racial prejudice, that's ignorance. I do mention the Sikh temple massacre near Milwaukee since I happened to be in the region at the time. I noted that he was a white supremacist, since he was a neo-Nazi, but no one knows his motives since he committed suicide after being shot by police.

I'm not buying that you don't see CNN's unspoken intent anymore than I would believe that you don't and didn't thrive on feeding into it when you started this Op. I'm sure we'll have to agree to disagree as I'm done chasing your rabbit.

The fact that you assume I am a liar when I am not is your issue, not mine. Unfortunately, it has been a long pattern with you. You really need to think about why that is so.

 

[church mouse guy]

Omar is a Democrat party Jew hater who supports Hamas and Hezbollah. Who defends hatred of Jews except Democrats and rinos and other Jew haters such as KKK and American nazis?

 

[Use of Time]

If you can’t see or be honest about where they were trying to go with that story, sorry, I can’t help you. I really don’t think you would admit it no matter how obvious unless they directly confessed it and spelled out their intent and then you’d still attempt to defend the narrative because, obviously, you are into the same game as evidenced by your singling out this selection to Op this particular event.

I should just leave it there but, 1st, my objective opinion is based on measurements and observations of content such as CNN’s leading the story with noting he wore the turban and repeating that theme while neglecting to provide the information of the criminal being wanted for parole violation which would tend to establish the true motive as other than racial. How obvious can you get? 2nd, Other honest news agencies not commonly known for these types of agendas, like CNN, seemed to have no problem revealing the information that would point to motive being other than racial, which when used as a comparison, again, one would have to have a blind eye or be dishonest not to recognize the failure of CNN to present the facts along with their many repeated references to the religion of the slain officer which exposes their well-known agendas to invent such narratives.


If you’d like a blatant example of the narrative which demonstrates where this story is heading (to invent the suggestion of racism) your own words from within your head expose this underlying message to be brought forth exactly as I have alluded to:



We see here after you began with this OP you wasted no time going down the road of suggesting racism as the motive, yet while claiming you don't see the underlying agenda to lead into this narrative.

I'm not buying that you don't see CNN's unspoken intent anymore than I would believe that you don't and didn't thrive on feeding into it when you started this Op. I'm sure we'll have to agree to disagree as I'm done chasing your rabbit.

This seems unusually defensive. It’s like you are so ready for your rebuttal that you didn’t even wait for the argument to made. In fact, it still hasn’t happened. Tilting at windmills.

 

[church mouse guy]

Blame the other side for what you do, according to Alinsky. Defend the Jew hating Omar by telling about a cop who was murdered by a felon on the run. Deplorables figured it out--go figure. What's next? Crickets.

 

[Adonia]

Agree 100 %. Sikhs, as a moderator pointed out above, have long been British allies in India and elsewhere. They fought in WW I & WW II with the allies against Germany. Sikhs are noted for their bravery in battle and man for man won more combat medals than the British themselves in WW I. Every able-bodied man receives military training.

We have many Sikhs in Indianapolis. I have worked with them in various warehouses. They are good workers and very friendly. They have a Golden Temple in Punjab and one told me that he had been there. It is a pleasure to be around them. I have even patronized a restaurant that they have near my house. Not all of them wear a turban.

There are also many Sikhs out here driving trucks, with most of them coming from the Bakersfield area of California. I have talked to many of them and they are nice friendly people who work hard to make a go of things here in America. In NJ they seem to run most of the gas stations.

 

[Alcott]

WHAT DO WE WANT? DEAD COPS! WHEN DO WE WANT 'EM? NOW!

Okay, they got one.

 

[Benjamin]

This seems unusually defensive. It’s like you are so ready for your rebuttal that you didn’t even wait for the argument to made. In fact, it still hasn’t happened. Tilting at windmills.

I know a fishing expedition when I see one, and yes, I find the attempt to conclude racism and call people racist by the Left quite offensive - of course they know this and is why they rarely say it to one's face...

 

[Covenanter]

Omar is a Democrat party Jew hater who supports Hamas and Hezbollah. Who defends hatred of Jews except Democrats and rinos and other Jew haters such as KKK and American nazis?

Opposition to the state of Israel does not mean "Jew hater." Many Jews are opposed to the oppression of Palestinians by the European & American immigrants who claim that because of their Jewishness they are above God's Law calling for compassion, mercy, justice, love, etc.

Deu. 10:12 And now, Israel, what does the LORD your God ask of you but to fear the LORD your God, to walk in obedience to him, to love him, to serve the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, 13 and to observe the LORD’s commands and decrees that I am giving you today for your own good?

14 To the LORD your God belong the heavens, even the highest heavens, the earth and everything in it. 15 Yet the LORD set his affection on your ancestors and loved them, and he chose you, their descendants, above all the nations—as it is today. 16 Circumcise your hearts, therefore, and do not be stiff-necked any longer. 17 For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who shows no partiality and accepts no bribes. 18 He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing. 19 And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners in Egypt.

21 “You are to distribute this land among yourselves according to the tribes of Israel. 22 You are to allot it as an inheritance for yourselves and for the foreigners residing among you and who have children. You are to consider them as native-born Israelites; along with you they are to be allotted an inheritance among the tribes of Israel. 23 In whatever tribe a foreigner resides, there you are to give them their inheritance,” declares the Sovereign LORD.​

 

[church mouse guy]

Opposition to the state of Israel does not mean "Jew hater." Many Jews are opposed to the oppression of Palestinians by the European & American immigrants who claim that because of their Jewishness they are above God's Law calling for compassion, mercy, justice, love, etc.

Deu. 10:12 And now, Israel, what does the LORD your God ask of you but to fear the LORD your God, to walk in obedience to him, to love him, to serve the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, 13 and to observe the LORD’s commands and decrees that I am giving you today for your own good?

14 To the LORD your God belong the heavens, even the highest heavens, the earth and everything in it. 15 Yet the LORD set his affection on your ancestors and loved them, and he chose you, their descendants, above all the nations—as it is today. 16 Circumcise your hearts, therefore, and do not be stiff-necked any longer. 17 For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who shows no partiality and accepts no bribes. 18 He defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow, and loves the foreigner residing among you, giving them food and clothing. 19 And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners in Egypt.

21 “You are to distribute this land among yourselves according to the tribes of Israel. 22 You are to allot it as an inheritance for yourselves and for the foreigners residing among you and who have children. You are to consider them as native-born Israelites; along with you they are to be allotted an inheritance among the tribes of Israel. 23 In whatever tribe a foreigner resides, there you are to give them their inheritance,” declares the Sovereign LORD.​

What are you talking about? If you support Hamas and Hezbollah, you are a Jew hater. Besides, you know that the Quran teaches that Jews and Christians are enemies of Islam and must either convert to Islam or be slain.

This woman lied to get into America about her surname. She married her brother to bring him into the country. She married another man and had a child. Then she ran off from her husband and child and started living openly with another woman's husband. Under sharia law, which you have in the UK, she should be executed. Furthermore, she wears headdress in Congress in defiance of tradition so that we would not look like the overbearing English.

You are letting your hatred of Israel from the times when England ran the middle east blind you. The Jews attacked England in Israel before 1948 because of their failure to enforce the League of Nations mandate.

Now Israel is a close military ally of the USA. Case closed. This Omar sits on the foreign relations committee and has access to military secrets concerning Israel and she probably has betrayed us to Muslim jihadi psychopaths already--possibly some headquartered in London.

 

[Use of Time]

I know a fishing expedition when I see one, and yes, I find the attempt to conclude racism and call people racist by the Left quite offensive - of course they know this and is why they rarely say it to one's face...

Well thank goodness you are out in front of it.