OldRegular
Well-Known Member
From what I understand the stories from the other cultures were written in their language, in their part of the world, right after or possibly during the flood, and most never mentioned Noah and actually had their own wildly varying versions of who survived. I'm just saying that it would be in error to view this as proof that we're talking about the same flood because for this situation to occur, there would have to be other survivors, which they claim, and the bible says there wasn't. It has nothing to do with not accepting what God said, it's accepting it as truth then realizing that perhaps some of these other stories may not measure up. Thanks for the benefit of the doubt though folks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deluge_myth
All I'm saying is that just by knowing those other stories existed I used to think that is proof, but if you read more about it, it doesn't back up the same story. Read those differenet cultures on that page, many of them have their own version of who exactly survived the flood. Since there were different survivors, they are not talking about the same flood.
Your rationale is incorrect. After the flood God dispersed the people throughout the earth and gave them different languages. [Read Genesis 11ff.] It is obvious to rational thinking that the memory of tales of the flood would have lasted much longer than memory of Noah
However, the biggest problem with your post is that it disputes the Bible.