• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Foreknowledge of God Put in Biblical Context

Sai

Well-Known Member
Are you claiming atpollard to be a sheep? When did you become a sheep? Is "sheep" a metaphor for a born again Christian? Is it a metaphor for the Christian church that is founded upon the death , burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ? If you will accept the fact that the apostle Paul is given the revelation and doctrines of the NT church of Jesus Christ, which I am almost sure you will not,, why does he not present the church as a sheepfold and born again Christians as sheep? He wrote 13 letters to teach and explain the church. You would think that he would have used the terminology that you are forcing upon the church, sheep and sheepfold and the like. The death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ and the subsequent pouring out from heaven of the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of God and of Christ in a particular time in history to indwell men and assure them of the new birth means little to nothing to Calvinists, especially the hyper ones. It is tragic that the most important and wonderful thing that ever happened in history has to take second place to some kind of ethereal election of a few special people who fancy themselves as sheep of God.

It amazes me that Paul only uses the term "sheep" one time in his 13 letters and that is in the context of his addressing Jews in this present time, after God had ended the Law of Moses as his operative principle of divine dealing with the Jews and gentiles were accepted now equally with them, not by becoming proselytes to Israel but by becoming children of God through the spiritual new birth. This was written in AD 58, twenty eight years after Chris,t through his death, had ended the law by fulfilling all of it's requirements and was the Lamb that took away the sin of the world, according to God, but not according to Calvinists, who are not only ignorant of the scope of the sacrifice of Jesus Christ but are also deniers of it. This kind of false teaching is not something that God is tolerant of. What one says about this wonderful person had better be the same thing that God the Father says about him in his record, the Holy Scriptures, the one and only standard of truth by which all teaching must be compared. The lake of fire is going to be populated by the deceived.It is one thing to quietly reject God's offer of salvation and quite another to replace it with something else and then to teach it to others as truth.

Rom 10:4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
Heb 10:9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.
Heb 9:16 For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. 17 For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

2 Cor 3:6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life

Some Reformed here have actually suggested in their comments that men had the Spirit of life before Christ died on the cross. Makes one wonder why he died if that were true.
Gal 3:15 Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.
16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. (in the Abrahamic Covenant) He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after (after the Abrahamic covenant of promise) , cannot disannul, (The Moses Covenant does not disannul the promise of the Abrahamic Covenant) that it should make the promise of none effect.
18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.(What is the promise? It is Life. What is life? This chapter identifies it as the Spirit of Christ).
23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

The Jews did not get the Spirit by being drawn to Jesus by the Father in John 6. Neither did they become sheep because of it. They were already sheep and they belonged to the Father. The Lord Jesus became their shepherd when they willingly obeyed the Father. Gentiles never become sheep. They become children of God by faith in Jesus Christ.

I hope you will consider these things.

David, the prophets, Melchizedek, had the Spirit of God.
 

Sai

Well-Known Member
What do you think the new birth is?

Flesh is flesh spirit is spirit. A man who accepts the God required content of faith, by grace is born spiritually.

Having been born spiritually man has a dual nature and can seek the things of God.

Adam, having died spiritually the day he ate the fruit of the tree God had warned against, could not seek God but hid himself. By killing the animals and clothing Adam God showed that sin would be judged in physical death, the shedding of blood. Then God spelled out the Adamic Covenant to Adam which became the content of faith required for salvation. Cain did not believe - he was not alive spiritually. Able did believe and Able was a born again spirit who’s sacrifice to cover his sins was accepted.

Sin was covered by the blood of innocent animals by God. That is how God’s judicial requirements for men’s sins were atoned for. Salvation obviously was in the very possession of the pre cross believer. What he awaited was the removal of his sins. We now, today do not await the removal of our sins, they have already been removed and we will not endure any judgement for them at all.
 

Dave G

Well-Known Member
The more I read, the more I see Calvinism for the philosophy that it is.
George,
I'm not sure why you think it's philosophy, but I distinctly remember going from first an "Arminian" and then a "Traditionalist" mindset, to now being fully "5-Point Calvinist" over more than 42 years, and I can tell you today what I see more as vain philosophy...

IMO, it isn't what is commonly called "Calvinism".
Therefore before the resurrection of Jesus Christ, there was no new birth.
" Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." ( John 3:3 )
According to Jesus' own words, in order to see the kingdom of Heaven, one must be born again.

" And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven." ( Matthew 8:11 ).
If these men were not born again ( made partakers of the new birth ), then how is it that they are they in the kingdom of Heaven?
 
Last edited:

Barry Johnson

Well-Known Member
George,
I'm not sure why you think it's philosophy, but I distinctly remember going from first an "Arminian" and then a "Traditionalist" mindset, to now being fully "5-Point Calvinist" over more than 42 years, and I can tell you today what I see more as vain philosophy...

IMO, it isn't what is commonly called "Calvinism".

" Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." ( John 3:3 )
According to Jesus' own words, in order to see the kingdom of Heaven, one must be born again.

" And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven." ( Matthew 8:11 ).
If these men were not born again ( made partakers of the new birth ), then how is it that they are they in the kingdom of Heaven?
You think Abraham , issac and Jacob went to heaven when they died ? How ? Their sins had not been dealt with yet ? No ones sins were paid for until the cross . without the resurrection no one would be in heaven ,including all the old testament believer's.
1 cor 15 .50
Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
 
Last edited:

Barry Johnson

Well-Known Member
As a Particular Baptist, I am a “Calvinist” and that is not what I believe “Foreknew” (as in Romans 8:29 and προέγνω) means. That is also not what any Calvinist that I know teaches it means. We believe that God DOES know all of those things, but that is not the “Foreknew” of Romans 8 or Romans 11.

The meaning is closer to “always loved” and reflects that God had a personal relationship with His People even before they were born. It reflects the RELATIONAL nature of the Godhead. God loves, God cares, God wants fellowship with His creation ... so God does what is necessary to make it happen.
How can God have a 'personal relationship 'with someone who does not exist?
 

Barry Johnson

Well-Known Member
First a clarification; foreknowledge and omniscience are not the same in the scriptures. God is omniscience which means he knows all things by one eternal act of knowing. He is God after all. He is able to give his prophets perfect prophecy of people and events of thousands of years in advance and on in to eternity. Foreknowledge is presented as an attribute of God and is clearly defined for us in the scriptures. The scriptural definition differs greatly from what we are led to believe by the Calvinists, and frankly by most non Calvinists, most of whom have been influenced or intimidated by Calvinism's false error concerning this great doctrine..

Most teaching about foreknowledge says that God knows who will be saved and who will be lost, everything that will happen at any time and he knows everything from before the creation of the world. I agree that he does know all those things but that is not what he means when he uses the word foreknow or foreknowledge. That would be under the term omniscience.

Here is foreknowledge in the scriptures;

1) It is a New Testament doctrine
2) It is used exclusively in the context of God and Israel, whom God says hundreds of times in scripture that they are his people
3) It means in it's simplest terms that God knew them before, in time past.
4) It is not used of gentiles in time past.

Here is a comparison of two passages that should be a great instructor in the term foreknowledge and how it is used in scripture. Read these and consider them.

Rom 8:28 And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.
29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.

Now, look at who Paul thinks he is speaking of since he wrote both passages in the same discourse, Who does he say is foreknown of God, or known before?

Here is the biblical answer;

Rom 11:1 I say then, Hath God cast away his people? (who are his people - keep reading) God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

2 God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel saying,

Why would anyone get the idea that God has cast away his people Israel? Because for 1500 years before Christ came he had been dealing with this people exclusively and had a relationship with them and now, 28 years after the ascension of Jesus Christ, when this epistle was written and for 18 years previously, the Apostle Paul and others had been preaching that God will receive gentiles equally with his people through faith in the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, making them sons of God and receiving them into the body of Christ which he is forming upon this testimony and in the name of Jesus Christ. Romans 7 through 11 explains the history that is contained in the first few chapters of the Acts and by studying it we can know why God included the gentiles in Acts 10, ten years after he began to form his church through Jewish believers.

This will be an important lesson and should stamp out a great deal of ignorance concerning foreknowledge. I will continue to make my points in the coming days. I hope some will participate.
“Foreknow” is being known by God in the sense of Gal. 4:9 after conversion and before glorification as if already glorified. It does not refer to any time prior to conversion. (Gal. 4:8-9; Rom. 8:29-30; 1 Pet. 1:2)
 

Sai

Well-Known Member
Good to see that we are all still here trying to figure this out. But not you Barry.
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
" Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." ( John 3:3 )
According to Jesus' own words, in order to see
the kingdom of Heaven, one must be born again.
(Emphasis mine).

Note how you substituted the physical, geo-political, Israelitish kingdom of heaven, for the spiritual kingdom of God. There are lost men in the political millennial kingdom, there are no lost men in the spiritual kingdom.

Paul commanded us to "divide" the scriptures (2Ti.2:15).

Now, that will take us into a discussion of the two kingdoms, but for the sake of briefly answering now, I point that substitution out.
 

atpollard

Well-Known Member
How can God have a 'personal relationship 'with someone who does not exist?

"Remember this, and be assured; Recall it to mind, you transgressors. Remember the former things long past, For I am God, and there is no other; [I am] God, and there is no one like Me, Declaring the end from the beginning, And from ancient times things which have not been done, Saying, 'My purpose will be established, And I will accomplish all My good pleasure'; Calling a bird of prey from the east, The man of My purpose from a far country. Truly I have spoken; truly I will bring it to pass. I have planned [it, surely] I will do it.” [Isaiah 46:8-11 NASB]

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being. In Him was life, and the life was the Light of men. The Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. ... And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.” [John 1:1-5, 14 NASB]

Then He said to me, "It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give to the one who thirsts from the spring of the water of life without cost.” [Revelation 21:6 NASB]​

God exists outside of finite time and space. Before the beginning of the beginning and after the end of the end ... eternally unchanging. If God will love us in the future, then God loves us now and God loved us in eternity past. The alternative is that God lied when he said that He is unchanging (which also means that God is not perfect, because any change to perfection must make it less perfect.)
 

Dave G

Well-Known Member
Note how you substituted the physical, geo-political, Israelitish kingdom of heaven, for the spiritual kingdom of God. There are lost men in the political millennial kingdom, there are no lost men in the spiritual kingdom.
They are one and the same, George.
The kingdom of Heaven becomes the kingdom of God when the Lord Jesus gathers His elect at the end of the "Great Tribulation" ( Matthew 24 ) and takes the throne at Jerusalem:

" And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become [the kingdoms] of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever." ( Revelation 11:15 ).

However, I agree that there are no lost men in the spiritual kingdom, but there are lost men in that physical kingdom for exactly 1,000 years.

Now for Matthew 8:11's parallel passage in Luke 13:29, which I should have used to begin with.
Apologies for not being more accurate in my usage of the Scriptures.

" There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you [yourselves] thrust out.
29 And they shall come from the east, and [from] the west, and from the north, and [from] the south, and shall sit down in the kingdom of God."
( Luke 13:28-29 ).

Again, in order to see the kingdom of God, one must be born again ( John 3:3 ).
Therefore, I see that the new birth did indeed occur before the cross. :)

What did not occur was the indwelling of the Holy Spirit wholesale in all that were born again.
That came at Pentecost.
 
Last edited:

Barry Johnson

Well-Known Member
"Remember this, and be assured; Recall it to mind, you transgressors. Remember the former things long past, For I am God, and there is no other; [I am] God, and there is no one like Me, Declaring the end from the beginning, And from ancient times things which have not been done, Saying, 'My purpose will be established, And I will accomplish all My good pleasure'; Calling a bird of prey from the east, The man of My purpose from a far country. Truly I have spoken; truly I will bring it to pass. I have planned [it, surely] I will do it.” [Isaiah 46:8-11 NASB]

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being. In Him was life, and the life was the Light of men. The Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. ... And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.” [John 1:1-5, 14 NASB]

Then He said to me, "It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give to the one who thirsts from the spring of the water of life without cost.” [Revelation 21:6 NASB]​

God exists outside of finite time and space. Before the beginning of the beginning and after the end of the end ... eternally unchanging. If God will love us in the future, then God loves us now and God loved us in eternity past. The alternative is that God lied when he said that He is unchanging (which also means that God is not perfect, because any change to perfection must make it less perfect.)
Only in Him . We have ' out 'of Christ and 'in Christ ' . No one is in Christ before they are born .
 

atpollard

Well-Known Member
Only in Him . We have ' out 'of Christ and 'in Christ ' . No one is in Christ before they are born .
God had a personal relationship with us:

Blessed [be] the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly [places] in Christ, just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him. In love He predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the kind intention of His will, to the praise of the glory of His grace, which He freely bestowed on us in the Beloved. [Ephesians 1:3-6 NASB]​

God is not constrained by the space-time that He created. God is greater than His creation.
 

Barry Johnson

Well-Known Member
God had a personal relationship with us:

Blessed [be] the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly [places] in Christ, just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him. In love He predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the kind intention of His will, to the praise of the glory of His grace, which He freely bestowed on us in the Beloved. [Ephesians 1:3-6 NASB]​

God is not constrained by the space-time that He created. God is greater than His creation.
Chosen for what ? to do what ? . it doesn't say ' to be saved ' . Let's stick with what it says and forget about philosophy .
Predestined to what? Again , to be saved ? no , the adoption. Rom 8 .23
 

atpollard

Well-Known Member
Chosen for what ? to do what ? . it doesn't say ' to be saved ' . Let's stick with what it says and forget about philosophy .
Predestined to what? Again , to be saved ? no , the adoption. Rom 8 .23
I think you have forgotten the question you actually asked me or you would have understood that WHAT we were predestined to is irrelevant to answering your original question.
Later.
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
They are one and the same, George.
The kingdom of Heaven becomes the kingdom of God when the Lord Jesus gathers His elect at the end of the "Great Tribulation" ( Matthew 24 ) and takes the throne at Jerusalem:

" And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become [the kingdoms] of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever." ( Revelation 11:15 ).

However, I agree that there are no lost men in the spiritual kingdom, but there are lost men in that physical kingdom for exactly 1,000 years.

Now for Matthew 8:11's parallel passage in Luke 13:29, which I should have used to begin with.
Apologies for not being more accurate in my usage of the Scriptures.

" There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you [yourselves] thrust out.
29 And they shall come from the east, and [from] the west, and from the north, and [from] the south, and shall sit down in the kingdom of God."
( Luke 13:28-29 ).

Again, in order to see the kingdom of God, one must be born again ( John 3:3 ).
Therefore, I see that the new birth did indeed occur before the cross. :)

What did not occur was the indwelling of the Holy Spirit wholesale in all that were born again.
That came at Pentecost.

Those two kingdoms – the spiritual and the physical – are not the same kingdom, yet in in a way they are because together they form a whole realm under God. Your spirit and your body are not the same thing, yet both of them are you, a single person [hopefully]. To confuse the two would be a mistake, and to completely separate the two would be a mistake. So it is with the following two Biblical expressions:
1) the kingdom of God and 2) the kingdom of heaven.
The expression the kingdom of God is basically a reference to the spiritual aspect of the kingdom as God is a spirit (Jn.4:24).
The expression the kingdom of heaven is basically a reference to the physical aspect of the kingdom, as heaven is a place (Rev.12:8, 20:11).
But since God is in heaven, it is normal to think of the kingdom of God and the kingdom of heaven as referring to the same thing, especially when you read equivalent statements:

Kingdoms Harmonizing.gif

So it appears these two expressions refer to the same kingdom. The confounding element is that the expression kingdom of God – though mostly a reference to the spiritual aspect of the kingdom – is a general expression which sometimes refers to the holistic aspect of the kingdom – both spiritual and physical. It’s as with the term “America” which sometimes refers to the nation and sometimes to the continent – which also includes the nation – and the main way to tell the difference is the context. Likewise, the term “kingdom of God” sometimes refers to the narrower physical/political kingdom of God and sometimes to the wider and fundamentally spiritual kingdom of God – which also includes the physical/political kingdom of heaven:

5165_82537aa05a08c86ccc8a6c9fef6a57e2.gif


The spiritual kingdom and the physical kingdom are part of the same overall kingdom, but they are not the same and that will begin to explain what the Lord called the mystery of the kingdom of God (Mark 4:11). The lower two are never identical. The expression the kingdom of God can refer to the kingdom of heaven when the context is physical/political/Israelitish, but when the context is spiritual it cannot; and vice-versa the expression the kingdom of heaven can never refer to the spiritual aspect of the kingdom of God.

Any study that fails to note the following differences between the two aspects of the kingdom is non-scriptural study:

5167_5f11a95b3d9e32f9fefcd765610b1f3a.gif

5168_3d43d677380f71717e93b3c81cb1f0c6.gif


5169_3155cd94eca2bdf36347f8fc65f27abd.gif
5170_587e33d990922b60e1cfbd4622a62f8e.gif
 
Top