The Holy Bible AV1611

[David J]

Originally posted by william s. correa:
2 Chron. 36:9, KJV...Jehoiachin was eight years old when he began to reign, and he reigned three months and ten days in Jerusalem: and he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD. And so did wescott and hort!

Sigh...I feel like I'm in grade school again!

This is play ground talk! LOL!!!!!!

 

[robycop3]

Originally posted by william s. correa:
2 Chron. 36:9, KJV...Jehoiachin was eight years old when he began to reign, and he reigned three months and ten days in Jerusalem: and he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD. And so did wescott and hort!

GEE WHIZ!!

I jest larnt sum nue histry! I didunt no Weskot or hoart wuzz ever kingzz!

 

[robycop3]

The Jehoiachin thingie isn't a KJV error; it's just to prove God gave His perfect word to imperfect men who sometimes goofed, as we all do on occasion.

Remember, Kings & Chronicles are historic narratives written my men, but selected by God to become Scripture. A close reading of each one shows there was at least one other version of Kings & one other version of Chronicles that didn't make Scripture.

I believe, however, that if ine puts together the events in Kings & Chronicles, one has a more accurate picture of the actual events. Such is the case with the bronze basin in the Temple. It was observed about 2/3 full, (2K baths)but it had a known capacity of 3K baths.

Now, where one says Jehoiachin reigned 3 months & the other says 3 mos, 10 days, the writer of Chronicles may have been in the king's court, while the writer of Kings had only secondhand info. However, this does NOT cover a 10-year gap. I believe the writer of Kings made a typo. After all, the Hebrew word for eight is sh'mownah, and for eighteen is sh'mownah'asar, the "asar" meaning "teen", Asar, according to a rabbi I know, is always a prefix or suffix, never a stand-alone word. After all, it's easy for US to make a typo between eight-eighteen.

 

[robycop3]

Mr. Correa, care to comment on this, from a post I recently made to Rev. Lowery in this thread?

And here's one to show ya JESUS isn't limited to one version per language. Please compare Isaiah 42:7 and 61:1-3 with what JESUS READ ALOUD in Luke 4:16-21. I and many others useta believe He was reading from the LXX, which His words in Luke match fairly well, But Doc Cassidy and some Hebrew scholars believe there were at least two vorlage Hebrew mss in use at that time/place...and investigation points more toward that explanation than to the LXX. In fact, there's a good possibility that the LXX was made from one of those vorlage mss. Whatever the truth may be, Jesus was reading aloud from a text that didn't match the Ben Chayyim Text used to make the Old Testaments of the KJV and several other versions.

Wanna suggest JESUS was reading from a corrupt version? Be my guest....OTOH, be someone else's guest!

 

[william s. correa]

"For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were
before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men" -Jude 1:4

"And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him." (Revelation 12:9) All Modernist read versions which do not contain the mind of God because they are to caught up in self destruction due to the fact that none of them agree on any good thing! Especially that is missing crucial Scripture to save the soul from hell! They are suiting the itchy ears of all who will follow to be led into the ditch! The Modernists would have you beleive a dipecable Lie that it is the Word of God But none of them Agree! So it is either Gods Word or it is Not ![attacks on the Bible and other posters deleted] The Holy Bible 1611
I believe in the verbal, plenary inspiration of the Bible. The Old and New Testament are definitely inspired word for word. I accept the Textus Receptus manuscripts from which came the King James Bible. The Scripture is the Final Authority in all matters of faith, morals, and practice. I recognize the 1611 King James Bible as the fulfillment of God's promise to preserve His Word in Psalm 12:6-8. I believe that ALL modern translations are corrupt. and I listen to the teachings of my pastor Berman Cape Jr. and Dr. Jack Hyles

"Failure means I dared try." - Dr. Jack Hyles

"Remind your mind to use His mind." - Dr. Jack Hyles

[ May 18, 2006, 11:25 PM: Message edited by: C4K ]

 

[william s. correa]

Originally posted by robycop3:
Mr. Correa, care to comment on this, from a post I recently made to Rev. Lowery in this thread?

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />And here's one to show ya JESUS isn't limited to one version per language. Please compare Isaiah 42:7 and 61:1-3 with what JESUS READ ALOUD in Luke 4:16-21. I and many others useta believe He was reading from the LXX, which His words in Luke match fairly well, But Doc Cassidy and some Hebrew scholars believe there were at least two vorlage Hebrew mss in use at that time/place...and investigation points more toward that explanation than to the LXX. In fact, there's a good possibility that the LXX was made from one of those vorlage mss. Whatever the truth may be, Jesus was reading aloud from a text that didn't match the Ben Chayyim Text used to make the Old Testaments of the KJV and several other versions.

Wanna suggest JESUS was reading from a corrupt version? Be my guest....OTOH, be someone else's guest!

</font>[/QUOTE]where did you get that info the Kabola?

 

[robycop3]

Mr. Correa:The Holy Bible 1611[/i]

Which, by the Scriptures you post, you don't use.

I believe in the verbal, plenary inspiration of the Bible.

So does every Christian. So far, so good.

The Old and New Testament are definitely inspired word for word.

Well, not EXACTLY.

I accept the Textus Receptus manuscripts from which came the King James Bible.

Which of the over 20 revisions is the right one? And what about the PROVEN GOOF in Rev. 17:8?

The Scripture is the Final Authority in all matters of faith, morals, and practice.

Ya got another one right.


I recognize the 1611 King James Bible as the fulfillment of God's promise to preserve His Word in Psalm 12:6-8.

Totally wrong. First, God does NOT limit Himself to the KJV in English, and YOU have no authority to thus try to limit Him. Second, you apparently are NOT using the AV 1611, as is shown by the verses you post. Third, the AV 1611 and every other valid version shows Psalm 12:7 is about PEOPLE, and not God's words...unless you don't believe the AV translators.


I believe that ALL modern translations are corrupt.Then you simply believe WRONGLY, you believe something NOT FOUND IN SCRIPTURE, either directly, or by implication.

and I listen to the teachings of my pastor Berman Cape Jr. and Dr. Jack Hyles

If your PASTOR told you the bunk you've been posting, I'm glad he's far from MY 'hood. And Hyles pushed a lie...that one may be saved ONLY from the words of the KJV.

Hey, ya might ask yer pastor to jump into this discussion. That way, we'd have TWO comedians in the same thread!

 

[robycop3]

Originally posted by william s. correa:
[QB]

Originally posted by robycop3:
[qb] Mr. Correa, care to comment on this, from a post I recently made to Rev. Lowery in this thread?

where did you get that info the Kabola?

If ya can't answer, please be the CHRISTIAN you claim to be and admit it. After all, a Christian tenet is HONESTY. Spin isn't honest.

 

[william s. correa]

The only way to heaven is Jesus the Word of God! [attack on the Bible snipped] And cannot prove to be; just guessing that they are, and making the claim when God never ordained them as I Qouted in Scriptue which you ommitted in my post which you are a Magician in doing! So then You have Not proved your Point and have yet to as has DD and TCassidy who has beleived you and been deceived!Amen.

[ May 18, 2006, 11:26 PM: Message edited by: C4K ]

 

[StefanM]

So, william, are you saying that those who do not use the KJV are unsaved?

 

[PhatCat]

Originally posted by DesiderioDomini:
You are definately listening to a Spirit, but one this is certain: Your Spirit is not that taught in the KJV.

Ouch! I don't know how this guy can sleep at night! That is blasphemy, right? It's judging too. Oh, and unkind and unloving. Not meek. No edification here. Nope, and not even courteous in the heathen world.

But that accusation about the Spirit, wow! What if God is leading His dear child to the KJB and this guy said that, wow! [personal attack snipped]
And before you attempt to blast with "you're the one that's unloving, etc..."

Check out how Paul dealt with guys like you:

[ May 19, 2006, 01:20 AM: Message edited by: C4K ]

 

[Lagardo]

Originally posted by PhatCat:
Fool!

And before you attempt to blast with "you're the one that's unloving, etc..."

Check out how Paul dealt with guys like you:

1 Corinthians:
5:5 To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.

Different sin, same spirit.

Fool.

Um, yes you are the one who is unloving, and I dare say that you are not Paul and the words you type are not scripture.

 

[PhatCat]

Originally posted by Lagardo:

Um, yes you are the one who is unloving, and I dare say that you are not Paul and the words you type are not scripture. [/QUOTE]

How convenient that you don't mention the fact that this, person, accused a BROTHER IN CHRIST of having another spirit.

Look, people, I don't care what version you use, but saying that a child of God has another spirit, in reference to their Holy Spirit convictions is tantamount to blasphemy, ok. That has to be one of the most terrible things I've read here so far.

And by the way, I never said I was Paul, not even close. In fact I pointed out how PAUL dealt with that kind. And I don't claim to write Scripture. What a John Kerry thing to say.

 

[DesiderioDomini]

Ouch! I don't know how this guy can sleep at night! That is blasphemy, right? It's judging too. Oh, and unkind and unloving. Not meek. No edification here. Nope, and not even courteous in the heathen world.

One thing is clear: You have not been reading the posts. I believe all of us were curteous with William for quite some time.

His lies need to stop. I will pamper him no more.

But that accusation about the Spirit, wow! What if God is leading His dear child to the KJB and this guy said that, wow!

What is sad is that you think this actually has something to do with his stance on the KJV. Perhaps you should know what you are talking about before jumping in next time. Re-read the last few weeks of threads, then come back when you catch a clue!

That is not only offensive, but it is worthy of God taking you out and feeding your blaspheming carcus to the dogs. How dare you!

Your confusion seems to know no bounds.....step away from the ledge.

Fool!

From you, thats a serious compliment. Thanks!

And before you attempt to blast with "you're the one that's unloving, etc..."

You arent unloving. You are confused. You are simply ignorant of what you are attempting to discuss.

Check out how Paul dealt with guys like you:

1 Corinthians:
5:5 To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.

Not real sure how that applies, but since nothing William has ever said applied to any topic at hand, perhaps you are suffering from the same sickness.

Different sin, same spirit.

Considering the lies and misdirection that come from those you seem to defend, I wouldnt doubt that you would have no clue what Spirit or sin you are talking about.

Fool.

That mirror just sneaks up on ya, doesnt it?

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

I am going to keep closing threads as long as this kind of tit for tat personal attack exchange continues.