In another tread I observed an argument where an accusation of hypocrisy was being used to claim some sort of distorted defense for taking a side (whether or not taking that side is acknowledged outright) which would attempt to discount the differences between Capital Punishment and the Slaughter of Innocent Unborn by the millions which any honest rational thinker can clearly see it (motive) is in order to justify taking sides with the position of those which are outspoken pro-abortionists. At a minimum if someone goes about a constant attack against anyone who would stand up against the murder of innocent unborn children on the semantical premise that they are not pro-life if they are not against capital punishment makes one a hypocrite if he were to then turn around and say he is against abortion.
IOW’s with such an agenda the claim of being on the side of defending the Right of Life of the Unborn by someone is absolutely unbelievable when it is clearly rooted in the hypocrisy of that person being obsessively preoccupied with making a defense argument against those who stand up against abortion while basing that argument on capital punishment through playing games with the semantics over a definition of “pro-life”.
I thought to myself that therein it should obvious where the hypocrisy lies and addressed the motive and type of argument being presented but the thread was closed before I posted. I should probably say that I really don’t expect to see an argument worth addressing against my position forthcoming and am very short on time but I will take the time do so if there is any of an attempt to be rational and offer a valid argument by my opposition.
Jordan, as you probably know of his very common MO on this board, Zaac loves to throw out his Capital punishment “defense of abortion” (which is EXACTLY what it is.) against anyone who would dare condemn the slaughter of millions upon millions of innocent unborn lives. He is foolish enough to believe that taking the offense against Capital punishment is some sort of justifiable defensive argument against the slaughter of the innocent unborn. He unwittingly thinks he has some kind of irrefutable circular argument that by his “reasoning” (Therein if pinned down to even to the simplest of logical truth Zaac will call it mere psychobabble.) but one can easily conclude the fruit of his spirit is rooted in his beliefs of himself being morally superior to Christians and his pride in the belief of his having a “legitimate” “indisputable” cover up argument on such an all-important heartfelt issue as abortion.
Zaac has instantly reverted to his Capital Punishment Defense and uses it as some sort of exaltation for his very obvious position when I’ve mentioned the tragedy of abortion. In his foolish enthusiasm over his self-perceived intellectually moral superiority arguments over Christians he doesn’t even take into consideration that he doesn’t even know my position on capital punishment, his focus is entirely on the defense of the position he takes which at best would undeniably logically amount to throwing out the baby (aborted) with the bathwater. His “justification” basically rests in that refuses to distinguish between the severities of the acts. In his unrelenting obsession to discount “anyone” (Christian) who stands on the political issue of anti-abortion, which would clearly be against the Liberal Democratic position, he simply resorts to making a play on the semantics of the term “pro-life” (whether or not one uses that term) and goes into his Capital Punishment Defense of his troubling irrational position.
IMO he is a man too proud of his delusional moral superiority to Christians to address reason with him in an ethical way, his conscience is overrun with his abilities to present never-ending circular arguments for which he will not accept nor does he value logically true conclusions. He uses the BB as his sounding board against the deeply heartfelt Christian principles against abortion and it is useless to try to confront the irrational trolling practices of one who hides behind a computer screen and only answers to himself. I hesitate to feed this agenda and pretty much think of it as a waste of time, but occasionally need to vent I suppose and expose some truth about the situation going on here.
IOW’s with such an agenda the claim of being on the side of defending the Right of Life of the Unborn by someone is absolutely unbelievable when it is clearly rooted in the hypocrisy of that person being obsessively preoccupied with making a defense argument against those who stand up against abortion while basing that argument on capital punishment through playing games with the semantics over a definition of “pro-life”.
I thought to myself that therein it should obvious where the hypocrisy lies and addressed the motive and type of argument being presented but the thread was closed before I posted. I should probably say that I really don’t expect to see an argument worth addressing against my position forthcoming and am very short on time but I will take the time do so if there is any of an attempt to be rational and offer a valid argument by my opposition.
Jordan, as you probably know of his very common MO on this board, Zaac loves to throw out his Capital punishment “defense of abortion” (which is EXACTLY what it is.) against anyone who would dare condemn the slaughter of millions upon millions of innocent unborn lives. He is foolish enough to believe that taking the offense against Capital punishment is some sort of justifiable defensive argument against the slaughter of the innocent unborn. He unwittingly thinks he has some kind of irrefutable circular argument that by his “reasoning” (Therein if pinned down to even to the simplest of logical truth Zaac will call it mere psychobabble.) but one can easily conclude the fruit of his spirit is rooted in his beliefs of himself being morally superior to Christians and his pride in the belief of his having a “legitimate” “indisputable” cover up argument on such an all-important heartfelt issue as abortion.
Zaac has instantly reverted to his Capital Punishment Defense and uses it as some sort of exaltation for his very obvious position when I’ve mentioned the tragedy of abortion. In his foolish enthusiasm over his self-perceived intellectually moral superiority arguments over Christians he doesn’t even take into consideration that he doesn’t even know my position on capital punishment, his focus is entirely on the defense of the position he takes which at best would undeniably logically amount to throwing out the baby (aborted) with the bathwater. His “justification” basically rests in that refuses to distinguish between the severities of the acts. In his unrelenting obsession to discount “anyone” (Christian) who stands on the political issue of anti-abortion, which would clearly be against the Liberal Democratic position, he simply resorts to making a play on the semantics of the term “pro-life” (whether or not one uses that term) and goes into his Capital Punishment Defense of his troubling irrational position.
IMO he is a man too proud of his delusional moral superiority to Christians to address reason with him in an ethical way, his conscience is overrun with his abilities to present never-ending circular arguments for which he will not accept nor does he value logically true conclusions. He uses the BB as his sounding board against the deeply heartfelt Christian principles against abortion and it is useless to try to confront the irrational trolling practices of one who hides behind a computer screen and only answers to himself. I hesitate to feed this agenda and pretty much think of it as a waste of time, but occasionally need to vent I suppose and expose some truth about the situation going on here.
Last edited:
Get it?