The Interpretation of John 8:1-11

[Nazaroo]

Dear Nazaroo,
Please follow the BB posting rule


Quote:
12. Limit image size. Any image used in a post may not exceed the size of the BB logo at the top of the homepage.

Thanks for the heads up:

Can I leave these images until I find a way to either convert them to text or reduce their size?

Hopefully they are doing no harm at the moment.

Peace
Nazaroo

 

[Linda64]

Wow, I have to ask: Is the sun down there in the South baking everyone's brain?

Am I not writing plain English?

We are defending the authenticity and Johannine authorship of John 8:1-11, which has been called into question (NOT BY US) by most modern textual critics, and is placed in brackets with disparaging footnotes in almost every modern translation of the Bible.

We BELIEVE John wrote this passage. How many different ways must we say it.

How much more powerful evidence do you need to see it?


Peace,
Nazaroo

It took 3 pages of text and graphs to explain that John wrote John 8:1-11? I already knew that. It is sad that the authenticity of Scripture is questioned---but 3 pages of texts and graphs -- give me a break. I, like webdog, don't have time to read all that information you posted.

 

[Frogman]

Thanks for the heads up:

Can I leave these images until I find a way to either convert them to text or reduce their size?

Hopefully they are doing no harm at the moment.

Peace
Nazaroo

It may be helpful to post links to the images and the text if possible, perhaps this would help filter those who are interested enough in the topic to visit the link and discuss portions in this thread,?

Just a thought.

bro. Dallas

 

[Nazaroo]

Sure.

In the future I will just put the link in, and the person can opt to click on it to get the picture or not.

Hope that is okay, since there is a time limit on editing posts, and I don't want to see the posts all messed up now.

The arguments won't make much sense without the charts.

Peace,
Nazaroo

 

[standingfirminChrist]

Thank you Mods. The oversized charts not only used up bandwidth, but the links to such charts are much more appropriate.

 

[DHK]

The agenda was discussing the interpretation of John 8:1-11.

However apparently no one who is posting in this thread is actually interested in the topic.

My question now, is why, if you are not interested in the topic, are you posting in this thread?

It just doesn't seem sensible.

My question goes out to all:

If you are not really interested in the topic of this thread, why not start a new thread and post there? If you have questions that are not on-topic, why not start a thread about those topics and questions?
Nazaroo

This is a debate forum, not a Bible Study forum. It is not a place for you to post your Bible Study material. If every one here agrees that John 8:1-11 belongs in the Bible, there is nothing to debate and the thread may as well be closed. Enter into those topics in which you are interested in debating.

 

[Nazaroo]

Since your 'Bible Study' forum is for Baptists only, thats a nonsensical statement, isn't it?


Peace,
Nazaroo

 

[standingfirminChrist]

Perhaps another forum has the appropriate thread you can flood?

Why argue? If you did not want a debate, why did you post in the debate section?

Now you can stretch your brain.

 

[DHK]

Since your 'Bible Study' forum is for Baptists only, thats a nonsensical statement, isn't it?


Peace,
Nazaroo

You are confused. There is no "Bible Study" Forum. There are "Bible Fellowship" and "debate" forums. Both can be found in Baptist only and in the non-Baptist sections of the board. There is no forum dedicated strictly for someone to post their Bible studies. Thus, for the sake of further needless argument on the subject this thread will be closed.