The KJB VS the usual suspects

[Yeshua1]

So does that mean you do or do not believe God's word to be immutable, Psalms 119:89?

I do not think that promise was for English translations

 

[37818]

I do not think that promise was for English translations

So only English Bible translations are excluded.

 

[robycop3]

The question is not about KJB. It's about any Bible now.

It's easy to believe in the "authority" of something [originals] that doesn't exist. That doesn't take faith nor requires accountability. There is no "authority" to something that doesn't even exist.

The heretic Bart Ehrman is at least consistent: if preservation is not true, then inspiration of the originals is a moot point: if God didn't preserve perfectly, then he didn't inspire perfectly.

Duh.

This teaching is the logical end point of the denial of a perfectly preserved Bible (I didn't say KJB) and it is now being taught to the new generation in Christian institutions.

Those heretics will be your children, for you deniers of any perfect preservation have fathered them.

OK, Sir, please show us a perfect Bible translation, & explain your criteria for declaring it perfect. That shouldn't be difficult if you have one !

 

[robycop3]

You are wrong about that statement.

Hmmm could it be you use the above excuse so as not to answer our questions.

Salty, this gent reminds me of most of the KJVOs I've seen for the latt 40 years - They talk the talk, but don't/can't WALK THE WALK ! They blather a lot, but can't prove a word they say

And their failure to answer even the simplest pertinent question about KJVO reveals the falseness of that doctrine !

 

[Yeshua1]

So only English Bible translations are excluded.

No, ALL translations, so Vulgate, Geneva, Douy Rhems etc!

 

[Yeshua1]

Salty, this gent reminds me of most of the KJVOs I've seen for the latt 40 years - They talk the talk, but don't/can't WALK THE WALK ! They blather a lot, but can't prove a word they say

And their failure to answer even the simplest pertinent question about KJVO reveals the falseness of that doctrine !

well, they always do say Easter is a perfectly good rendering!

 

[robycop3]

well, they always do say Easter is a perfectly good rendering!

...As well as the ADDITION of "and shalt be" to Rev. 16:5 !

 

[Salty]

well, they always do say Easter is a perfectly good rendering!

Because King James said so

 

[Salty]

six hour warning
This thread will be closed no sooner than 530 pm / 230 pm PDT

This thread is closed