Baptist_Pastor/Theologian
New Member
The fact remains that you have argued that someone could be saved a part from hearing the gospel, through the light they have in general revelation. Second, you still have faith and hope confused. Your above discription only further illustrates the fact that your discription of faith is nothing more than a discription of hope. You are importing secular meanings in order to arrive at your definition. However, the Bible describes faith and hope differently that what you explain. Hope is your belief in the atoning work of the cross. Faith is your action in repenting. By faith you respond to the message, but faith requires a response. That is where James states that faith without works is dead. Hope is the object of what you have faith in, or in this case the promise of eternal life.DHK said:If anyone is confused with faith and hope it must be you. I certainly am not. Faith is dependent on knowledge. If it isn't then people have what is termed by many as "blind faith." That is what the Hindus have when they plunge themselves into the Ganges River with the "blind faith" that that river will wash away their sins. You might call that hope. Some would. But it is a blind faith because it is not based on knowledge. It is the same with the Roman Catholics who believe that the waters of baptism will wash away their sin--the same basic concept as the Hindus. They have no objective knowledge to base their belief, but have faith (not hope) that that is what happening. They don't hope that the sins are forgiven; they have faith that they are forgiven, for that is their belief. A belief is based on faith; not hope.
I believe that Christ died for my sins. I believe that when I put my faith and trust in his finished work that he will save me. That is faith not hope. It is faith because it is based in belief. The belief is based on the resurrection of Jesus Christ, which is one of the most historically attested facts of history. The belief is based on the gospel which we believe to be true. There is an intellectual basis for my belief. It is not blind. Therefore I have faith--faith that is based on belief. It is not hope--it is faith. "I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day." That is faith; not hope. "I know," not I hope. It is faith. I have the knowledge by faith.
Thus I used some other examples in daily living that I had hoped you would easily be able to understand. But unfortunately you didn't. When I start my car I have faith that it will start. My faith is based on knowledge. The knowledge here comes from different sources: it is empirical--I have done it many times before and it has not failed me (except for a couple of times). The knowledge is from the word of another. It is written in the handbook of the Ford Company. I have taken their word, that when I turn the ignition the car will start. Inasmuch as I take their word, based on their knowledge of the vehicle, I take God's Word--the knowledge I have of it.
God's Word is perfect. The knowledge that I have of salvation is sufficient enough for me to believe that when I put my faith (not hope) in the substutionary atonement of Christ he will save me. Thus faith and the atonement cannot be separated. One must have faith in the atonement to be saved. They cannot be separated and it has nothing to do with universalism.
If you believe that there are some that cannot be saved without the gospel, and that is true they cannot--I never said they could, then you are under obligation to go to them. You have consistently put words in my mouth, misaligned my position, and even inferred that I believe heresy. Continue to do so, and I will have to edit your posts. I expect you to debate an issue with respect and not to make innuendoes and inferences that are completely off base.
DHK, you need to take a healthy dose of the humility pill and sit back and let me teach a thing or two. You are over your head trying to debate me, so try and not do that. Let's dialog, it will be better for your image. I really hate to correct you when you present yourself as such an expert to the board, as if you are better and smarter than yours truly.:laugh: