The neocon moment is over

[Baptist in Richmond]

I guess I'm dumb, BiR, cuz I have no idea what you just said. I would think Kristol would be like Kryptonite, to a Chomsky fan such as yourself. And if you are saying the neocons are the only one with an agenda, then yer being silly.


So, once and for all, what is a "neocon" ? And why should I not resent being called one ?

Bro Curtis,

You know that I am quite fond of you; however, there are times when you really need to calm down and think through your response before you click on "submit reply."

1. I did not call you a "neocon." Actually, I never called anyone a "neocon." I simply made a statement. Go back and read what I wrote, and you will find this to be true.

2. I have never identified myself as a Chomsky fan. I do admit to enjoying his writings; nevertheless, I am a right-winger compared to Mr. Chomsky. I do not share many of his beliefs/opinions/viewpoints/thoughts.

3. Kristol has written some brilliant articles. I do not share his opinion on many things (By Kristol, I am referring to Irving). He is considered by many to be one of the fathers of Neoconservatism.

Based upon my experiences and exchanges with you, I don't know if I would consider you to be a "neocon." Bear in mind that this is simply a public forum, and I don't personally know you, but you don't seem to espouse all of their ideals or viewpoints. The only person I ever saw identify themselves as a "neocon" was the now-departed Joseph. Even then, I don't think he really understood what that term meant.

If you truly want to know what a "neocon" is, then I would suggest you read anything by Kristol, either one: father or son. Don't take my word for it: read it for yourself. You are smart, Bro. Curtis - I have faith in your ability to discern.

As for the thought that the "neocon moment is over," not a chance.
Did you see who was nominated by the President to replace the Neoconservative at the World Bank? Yep, you guessed it: another Neoconservative.

Regards, hope all is well,
BiR

 

[Bro. Curtis]

You should have said Irving Kristol. I've read a little Bill Kristol, and could not imagine you reading him. That's who I thought you meant. I see Irving is his dad, I never knew that. I never heard of him before I looked him up.

But I want the people who use the word, to tell me what it means, not point to someone else's description.

 

[Baptist in Richmond]

You should have said Irving Kristol. I've read a little Bill Kristol, and could not imagine you reading him. That's who I thought you meant. I see Irving is his dad, I never knew that. I never heard of him before I looked him up.

But I want the people who use the word, to tell me what it means, not point to someone else's description.

I would describe them exactly as they describe themselves. But you can discern for yourself, so I would recommend reading what they have written. It is more accurate for them to describe themselves to you, rather than reading what I think of them.

Hope this helps,
BiR

 

[Baptist in Richmond]

By the way, did everyone notice who was nominated to run the World Bank, succeeding the man who is arguably the worst WB president ever?

Yet another Neoconservative......

BiR