With new evidence coming to light--perhaps due to the spread of information on the internet--there are more and more skeptics against the pre-tribulation rapture doctrine.
Since this is a secondary doctrine anyway, why don't we emphasize that there will be a Second Advent and that there is an unimportant division on this subject. And if one must delve into the subject, then why not present the post-trib doctrine at least in passing? Maybe it is just me but I am getting very weary of the doctrine of the pre-trib rapture invading so many sermons and theological debates. If you believe pre-trib, God bless you, but do you have to mention it everytime someone turns a page of Scripture? There are a lot of us who think that the pre-trib doctrine is totally without foundation but otherwise we believe the Baptist Faith & Message as is.
Since this is a secondary doctrine anyway, why don't we emphasize that there will be a Second Advent and that there is an unimportant division on this subject. And if one must delve into the subject, then why not present the post-trib doctrine at least in passing? Maybe it is just me but I am getting very weary of the doctrine of the pre-trib rapture invading so many sermons and theological debates. If you believe pre-trib, God bless you, but do you have to mention it everytime someone turns a page of Scripture? There are a lot of us who think that the pre-trib doctrine is totally without foundation but otherwise we believe the Baptist Faith & Message as is.