The Rage of White, Christian America

[Zaac]

I told you why, you are dealing with Trump and his new political machine which may later do scans of social media data bases searching out those who made these accusations and looking for retribution.

[emoji33] And? He's a rapist.

Yes past tense. Hillary present tense.

Still making excuses. Ain't nothing about his behavior towards women past tense.

I categorize it false along with the murder charge of Vince Foster against the Clintons. I read the 9 page law suit filed on June 21, 2016 demanding $75,000 from Donald Trump filed by a Jane Doe (and a Tiffany Doe) and concluded it was false. This is a common device used to attempt to defame someone under the anonymity of John or Jane Doe.

The Trump campaign was announced and officially begun on June 16, 2016, the alleged rape law suit on June 21, 2016 by a Jane Doe demanding 75,000.

HankD

I categorize it as truthful and consistent with his past and present behavior towards women.



Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

 

[HankD]

[emoji33] And? He's a rapist.

Still making excuses. Ain't nothing about his behavior towards women past tense.

I categorize it as truthful and consistent with his past and present behavior towards women.

Well, I don't. As a womanizer perhaps especially in the past, as a rapist, no. Not without solid evidence Zaac.

HankD

 

[HankD]

Erratum June 16, 2016 S/B June 16 2015 on post#40.

HankD

 

[Alcott]

Nice try. I'm a lot of things. Dumb ain't one of them.

How many of them is it?

 

[Sapper Woody]

Zaac, you and I have had our go-arounds in the past, and I typically just try to steer clear of posting to you, as I know we won't see eye to eye on a lot of things.

However, you've been very clear in your stance that, absent a conviction, Hillary is not a criminal. Yet you are constantly saying Trump is a rapist, and there's been no conviction.

So, which is it? Do we call people what we think they are, or what they've been convicted of. Because of you're going to be square, if you call Trump a rapist, then you have to call Hillary a murderer and traitor. It's either both or neither.

Sent from my QTAQZ3 using Tapatalk

 

[Zaac]

Zaac, you and I have had our go-arounds in the past, and I typically just try to steer clear of posting to you, as I know we won't see eye to eye on a lot of things.

However, you've been very clear in your stance that, absent a conviction, Hillary is not a criminal.

Wrong. I've simply said that in nearly 40 years of public service, she's never been charged with or found guilty of anything.

Yet you are constantly saying Trump is a rapist, and there's been no conviction.

He is a rapist. And your attempt to use the above to question why I still say he is a rapist doesn't hold water because I never said she wasn't a criminal. But I've also never told anyone to vote for her or attempted to come up with reasons for folks to vote for her.

So, which is it? Do we call people what we think they are, or what they've been convicted of.

Umm, the lot of you have been quite good at saying what you think Obama is and what you think Hillary is. So why the sudden disdain just because I've pointed out that Trump is a rapist?

Because of you're going to be square, if you call Trump a rapist, then you have to call Hillary a murderer and traitor. It's either both or neither.

You're a bit confused. I don't have to call her anything but Hillary Clinton. Him I will call a rapist and a sexual predator because that's what he is.

So if you want to go back and call out everyone on here who has ever called Bill Clinton a rapist or said that he raped Juanita Broaddrick, or who has said that Hillary is a murderer, please do. Otherwise, in your own words, be square. If you're gonna come at me sideways for calling Trump a rapist even though there's been no conviction, it might have helped your case if in the past you had said the same to the Clinton accusers.

As there exists this wee bit of hypocrisy in your stance, I'm good and will stand by what I said.

He is a rapist. He and Epstein raped a 13 year old girl. The sad thing is that the Holy Spirit has delivered that y'all know, just as well as you know he is a proven sexual predator.

And how any man with a wife, daughter, niece etc can pretend like there is any question as to whether or not they raped that girl is just as disgusting in my book as he is.

Powerful men have been getting away with this type of thing for too long. And leaving victims in their trail.



Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

 

[Alcott]

As there exists this wee bit of hypocrisy in your stance, I'm good and
And how any man with a wife, daughter, niece etc can pretend like there is any question as to whether or not they raped that girl is just as disgusting in my book as he is.

How "disgusting" is it that she had dropped her lawsuit against him twice?

 

[carpro]

CTB - if you really buying this, if you really believe this -- then you'll never understand what actually happened this election. And all these opinions you're posting, from liberals trying to provide theories -- they're just guesses.

Poor guy. He's suffering from a severe case of LTT syndrome and has fallen totally under the influence of all the race baiting kooks on the far left.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[carpro]

Zaac, you are a very angry man my brother and I think your anger has clouded your jugement.

HankD

Just suffering from a severe case of LTT syndrome. Not fatal but will addle their brains for awhile.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Zaac]

How "disgusting" is it that she had dropped her lawsuit against him twice?

How disgusting it is that two grown men could rape a 13 year old girl, and then in the midst of death threats, folks question the lawsuits being dropped against the two billionaires.[emoji57]

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

 

[Alcott]

How disgusting it is that two grown men could rape a 13 year old girl, and then in the midst of death threats, folks question the lawsuits being dropped against the two billionaires.

Not that disgusting, if that be the case, as I once dared a guy threatening me with a knife to dig it into my throat. Being like Christ includes having no fear of worldly death.

 

[Zaac]

Not that disgusting, if that be the case, as I once dared a guy threatening me with a knife to dig it into my throat. Being like Christ includes having no fear of worldly death.

Nothing to do with the disgusting nature of what Trump [emoji216] and Epstein [emoji200] did to a13 year old little girl.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

 

[Sapper Woody]

Wrong. I've simply said that in nearly 40 years of public service, she's never been charged with or found guilty of anything.

And neither has he, as far as this issue is concerned.

He is a rapist. And your attempt to use the above to question why I still say he is a rapist doesn't hold water because I never said she wasn't a criminal.

But you have defended her against people who would call her a murderer by pointing out that she's never been convicted. Same thing.

Umm, the lot of you have been quite good at saying what you think Obama is and what you think Hillary is. So why the sudden disdain just because I've pointed out that Trump is a rapist?

"The lot of you" groups me in with others. I challenge you to find one post where I've said anything bad about President Obama or Hillary Clinton. You won't find one. What you will find, however, is around the end of 2011 having almost a whole thread telling people that they need to stop using names like "Obummer" and "The Zero" to describe President Obama, as that is unchristian and disrespectful to the office.

You're a bit confused. I don't have to call her anything but Hillary Clinton.

No one's forcing you to, just calling you out on your hypocrisy.

Him I will call a rapist and a sexual predator because that's what he is.

You have proof? You have a conviction? You have even a charge that hasn't been dropped?

So if you want to go back and call out everyone on here who has ever called Bill Clinton a rapist or said that he raped Juanita Broaddrick, or who has said that Hillary is a murderer, please do.

Wow, whine much? "They did it, too!"

Otherwise, in your own words, be square. If you're gonna come at me sideways for calling Trump a rapist even though there's been no conviction, it might have helped your case if in the past you had said the same to the Clinton accusers.

Hmmm, well, since I have, consider my case helped.

As there exists this wee bit of hypocrisy in your stance,

There doesn't.

I'm good and will stand by what I said.

Never expected you to do any other thing. But, since I've called out people on Hillary Clinton, I would be hypocritical to not call you out on Trump.

He is a rapist. He and Epstein raped a 13 year old girl.

Again, proof? Conviction?

The sad thing is that the Holy Spirit has delivered that y'all know, just as well as you know he is a proven sexual predator.

You're ability to get inside the mind of God is amazing. To know what He has revealed to people, and know their motivations better than they know themselves could be useful.

And how any man with a wife, daughter, niece etc can pretend like there is any question as to whether or not they raped that girl is just as disgusting in my book as he is.

Pretend like there's any question? No. You've got it backwards. It's almost certain it didn't happen. There's barely any question of whether it happened or not.

Powerful men have been getting away with this type of thing for too long. And leaving victims in their trail.

I agree. But that doesn't mean he did.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

Since I've disagreed with almost everything else in this post, I might as well disagree with where you sent this from!

 

[Zaac]

And neither has he, as far as this issue is concerned.

So I say again, unless you've recently said the same thing to those who have said similar things about her and her husband, your attempt to reason is lost in the obvious hypocrisy.

So there's no reason for me to read anymore of what you say as you're just making excuses.




Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

 

[Sapper Woody]

So I say again, unless you've recently said the same thing to those who have said similar things about her and her husband, your attempt to reason is lost in the obvious hypocrisy.

So there's no reason for me to read anymore of what you say as you're just making excuses.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

So, you're totally going to ignore the part where I said I've recently said the same thing to those who have said similar things about her and her husband unless I've recently said the same thing to those who have said similar things about her and her husband. Ok.

Edited to add: In fact, I'll go on record as saying right now that even though it is my personal opinion that Hillary Clinton is a murderer and a traitor, legally she's not, as she hasn't been tried and convicted. And anyone who calls her such and gets outraged at calling Trump a rapist is setting a double standard. And vice versa. For everyone involved, either it's both or neither.

Both have power, and both could be using that power to get away with things. It is my personal opinion that she is while he is not. But my personal opinion doesn't count in court.

 

[Zaac]

So, you're totally going to ignore the part where I said I've recently said the same thing to those who have said similar things about her and her husband unless I've recently said the same thing to those who have said similar things about her and her husband. Ok.

Yep. It's gone on for quite some time. And I'm pretty sure I don't recall you calling anybody out on it to my recollection. So again, the hypocrisy because it's now Trump, and you seem to want to act like doing now covers what you didn't do in the past.

Too little, too late.



Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

 

[Jkdbuck76]

Between Barack Obama’s 2008 election and 2016, America has transformed from being a majority white Christian nation (54 percent) to a minority white Christian nation (43 percent).

But on Election Day, paradoxically, this anxious minority swarmed to the polls to elect as president the candidate who promised to “make America great again” and warned that he was its “last chance” to turn back the tide of cultural and economic change.

One clue to the power of this racial and religious identity can be seen in the striking similarity of a map of white Christian population density by state to the red and blue election night map. While the similarity of those maps in Kentucky and West Virginia might not be a surprise, the same similarity in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania goes a long way to explaining why Hillary Clinton’s Midwestern firewall did not hold on election night.

The choice before the country was starkly clear. Donald J. Trump’s Republican Party looked back wistfully to a monochromatic vision of 1950s America, while the major party fronting the first female presidential candidate celebrated the pluralistic future of 2050, when the Census Bureau first projected the United States would become a majority nonwhite nation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/opinion/campaign-stops/the-rage-of-white-christian-america.html

So. The author blames it on racism......pretty myopic.
Oh well, it is an OPINION peace and not a FACTORY piece.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

 

[Jkdbuck76]

*FACT

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

 

[Yeshua1]

You are speaking of history over 100 years ago. When Nixon and the GOP party adopted their infamous Southern Policy they traded with the Dixiecrats and became the racist party. They did this after the Civil Rights Act passed. They were not and are not the party that wants all to have equal rights.

So your statement does not hold. We are in modern history and it is the GOP that plays the white rage card. Trump played on white rage and played the racist card well.

Actually, the ONLY reason that Johnson got the CivilRights bills passed intoLaw were due to the Republican Party...

Democratic Party always has kept Black people "on th plantation", and it's due today by keeping them dependent upon big government and the Government money dole!

 

[Crabtownboy]

Actually, the ONLY reason tat Johnson got te Civil Rihgts bills passed intoLaw weredueto the Republican Party...

Dmocratic Party always hae keptBlack people "on th plantation", and its du today by keeping tem dependt upon big governmetand theGovernment money dole!

Regardless of why the Civil Rights Act passed, the GOP through Nixon instituted their Southern Policy, which was a racist policy courting the white southerner. It was, is and always will be a racist policy.

Trump played the racist card very well in the campaign and, sadly, it looks as if he will have known racists in his cabinet. Sad day for American minority groups.