I disagree with the decision, but it shows what happens when church and state are mixed.
I thought we as true Baptists believed that the state should keep their noses out of our business and we should keep our noses out of theirs? Have we not historically believed that?
Fine line, though...we as an "official" church body shouldn't get mixed up in state affairs...but individual believers have every right to do so...and some might argue a responsibility.
But when a Christian, acting as a private citizen, expresses belief, faith, etc., that is in no wise tantamount to "Government establishment."
Face it...He was nixed for having expressed the truth of the exclusivity of Christ for salvation. And you can't do that in our country anymore...at least not in the public eye. And definitely not in any realm that in any way intersects any form, function, structure, or operation of government.
And being honest...how many places are there anymore in which government does not at least play a tangential role?
****10 bonus points for the use of "tantamount" AND "tangential." :saint:
****minus 5 points for disagreeing with a mod.