Jesus Christ didn't establish his new covenant for one week, he established it in the one week, when he was cut off after the 62 weeks that come after the 7 weeks (so after the 69 weeks). As such, the covenant being referenced here is concerning Jesus Christ and his new covenant.
Sorry, but the Promise of the New Covenant is not found in Daniel.
Secondly, it is clear in the Prophecy that the Covenant in view is confirmed (strengthened) for one Week. That does not fit at all the Promise of the New Covenant, which was to be established on an everlasting basis.
Third, sacrifice and oblation is relevant to the Covenant of Law...not the New Covenant.
But if you refuse to address these points there is not much more to discuss.
However, the reference to the antichrist, which is the desolator, is the one who desolates Jerusalem and the temple after the 70 weeks.
Again, this is error.
The desolation is clearly listed as within a seven year period, and this is the only period of seven given in the Prophecy. The logical conclusion is that this is Daniel's Seventieth Week.
There is absolutely nothing in Scripture that indicates the Abomination of Desolation takes place...after the Seventy Weeks.
He is the Roman seat of authority that continued to live on and that we now know as the papacy.
To quote a favorite detective of mine, "What ineffable twaddle!"
You now have a much greater problem of trying to connect the Church and "Roman Authority." You cannot deny that connection, but neither can you bring a relevant and consistent correlation that in any way ties into Prophecy.
Look, its really simple, there are Seventy Weeks divided into three parts, one seven Weeks long, one 62 Weeks long, and one one Weeks long. It's all right there in Daniel 9:24-27.
That seat of authority is the antichrist occupied by one man throughout those times and even until our times, who persecuted the saints for 1,260 years (time, times, and time and a half),
!260 does not equate to time, times, and half a time.
which we came to know as the inquisitions.
Which did not last for 1260 years...
Although the antichrist is one man, he is not just one man, but a line of men, first as emperors, then as popes, which are all Roman and related to the fourth beast of Daniel that broke into ten kingdoms, which relates to the sixth head of the first beast of Revelation and its ten horns,
Yes, The Antichrist is one man:
2 Thessalonians 2
King James Version (KJV)
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
Revelation 19:20
King James Version (KJV)
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
that also persecutes the saints 42 months (1,260 literal years).
Actually he has but a short time:
Revelation 13
King James Version (KJV)
4 And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?
5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
I'm not sure where you learned that forty two months equals 1260 years (which is nowhere mentioned in Scripture), but at the least you have to recognize the consistency of Scripture in giving 3 1/2 year peiods in regards to the Antichrist (the prince that shall come).
Its pretty obvious that you are trying to force a misinterpretation of these prophecies
And when you can address what I have propsed to you, and, as I have done, show the error in it, then the discussion can continue.
(70 weeks of Daniel) that are clearly speaking of the events of the first coming of the messiah to be some final week in our times, but that simply isn't so.
?
At no time have I mentioned the First Coming.
I have offered a very reasonable explanation, but you continue to refuse to come to understanding.
I have addressed your "reasonable explanation," as well as the errors, which are very basic (i.e., Christ did not establish the New Covenant for one Week, Christians did not destroy the City and Sanctuary), and am awaiting your response on those.
As I said, I can't offer you much help about understanding the first five seals of Revelation unless you first unlearn the false teachings you believe.
That's gotta be tough for you, lol.
The idea that Christ began opening the Seal Judgments after His death simply do not fit with what Scripture teaches.
The Judgments unleashed in Revelation will occur during the Tribulation Period, Revelation is pretty clear about that. There will be a forty two month period in which the Two Witnesses minister, and at the mid point they will be killed, and then shall the Antichrist take power. It is a specific period described in Revelation, that is in fact the point we have been given the Book.
And now I am out of time, so thanks for the responses, and don't over-worry yourself about that which you feel I need to unlearn. And if you can, just give a thought or two to the points I have raised, and perhaps at some point you will actually want to discuss them.
God bless.