OldRegular
Well-Known Member
This is impugning his character.
You keep inferring that it is his doctrine, and "his doctrine" came because he fell off a horse, was injured, and suddenly this revleation ("his doctrine") came to him while he was convalescing.
It is a childish attack on the character of Darby.
As I said, if I talked about Calvin or MacArthur or others in such a way it would create nothing but anger. But you don't get that. It doesn't even phase you when I give you a specific example.
You don't know how to present your case without attacking the person.
Your eisegesis of my posts, like your eisegesis if Scripture, is seriously flawed. And the truth is that you deliberately and with malice aforethought slimed Calvin and Calvinism. Nothing I said about Darby compares to that! You know it, I know it, and anyone else, except those in the circled wagons, knows it!