Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So you want to use personal attacks as a manipulation tactic to get people to post as you like.
Fact is fewer words often say more than many words often enough. We are expressing our view of things and we may do that with one liners and we may do that with 50 paragraphs. Either way that is our view and our expression of our view.
I am not sure that you can basically call those people, with whom you disagree, unintelligent in Jesus name. You like to tout how you follow Jesus I suggest you do so in your response to others. Own your words, I will own mine and others will own their words and we can all get along.
Good point. Why are people not calling for the removal of the cross from any public display since it was used for racism?
I agree. Let's get rid of the cross. After all, it's been burned many times to harass and intimidate minorities.
There's a huge difference between The Cross and a burning cross.
Doesn't matter. You argument is that the Confederate flag is bad because it's perceived as being bad.
By your own logic, that the cross is not actually bad is irrelevant if it's perceived as bad.
Nope. The BFONV is bad because of the reason it was placed over state houses
But a burning cross isn't the same as the Cross of Jesus.
So you can save this lil vain attempt to equate the two for some 6th grader who believes everything the grownups tell him.
So then why aren't crosses bad for the reason they were burned on people's lawns?
Again, you're the one who made it about perception, not me. So by your own logic, it is the way it's perceived.
Fine. Come back when you're in sixth grade and we'll continue this conversation.
Zaac said:Naah. You want it to be about perception
Actually, I've been arguing against the moronic idea that it's about perception.
That idiocy is your argument, not mine.
I'm still waiting for you to show me all the white supremacist groups affiliated with the Tea Party. That'd be a great way to set an intellectual example.
No, that is not the thought. If you disagree then disagree intelligently.
Your simply replies only go to prove the point of the thread on anti-intellectualism.
Then reply with intelligence and not with simple one-line quips that add absolutely nothing to the thread. Try writing an entire paragraph or two that says something. Thanks.
I'm still waiting for you to show me all the white supremacist groups affiliated with the Tea Party. That'd be a great way to set an intellectual example.