• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Success of Barak Hussein Obama

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
spot on....

The success is not his. He is only the face.

The true minds behind this socialistic attempt to wrestle America from true patriots is credited to all those socialistic teachers., professors and administrators who
who brainwashed the youth...
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
I have been having internet problems in accessing this site. Then, when I finally am able to get here I can't quote. Nevertheless...

O.R. you're not advancing a new idea. It has been common knowledge for quite some time that Obama has been very successful in implementing his objectives. Back in 2011 Rush said:"He's succeeded profoundly. He has done exactly what he intended to do...It's shocking the damage that's been done to this country in three years."

In Jan. of this year Rush has said:"Obama has succeeded on all fronts in transforming America..."

Don't listen to Rush. That being said I stated on this Forum in 2008 that Obama meant to destroy this country. He has succeeded!
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
CMG: I beg to differ with you. I seriously doubt that Harry Truman or even John F. Kennedy would have been sympathetic with any of the policies and goals of the Obama administration. They were Democrats, but of an entirely different order than Obama's breed. F.D.R. might have applauded some, or many of Obama's plans -- he would have been the exception. No, I think it's unfair to say that Obama is the greatest Democrat. The President is aligned with the Democratic party of modern times --but most Democratic leaders in American history would certainly object with the way in which the President has "managed" his office. That thesis won't fly.

I tend to agree. There have been some great democrats; Walter George and Richard Russell of Georgia, Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, "Scoop" Jackson of Washington state. And there are others.

I disagreed with some of the policies of Truman but he must be given credit for making the one of the toughest decisions ever, dropping the atomic bomb on Japan. That decision saved perhaps millions of lives, both American and Japanese. My brother was in the 32nd Division in the Philippines campaign and slated to be in the invasion of Japan if necessary.If my memory is correct he was kept in the dark about the nuclear program until Roosevelt died.

JFK had a problem similar to that of Clinton but was a commendable president. he was wrong on the Bay of Pigs but reestablished himself in the Missile Crisis. His move to cut taxes was a master stroke as time has shown.

LBJ was simply not tough enough to be president and I believe he recognized that. His "Great Society" has resulted in a substantial part of the national debt!

Was thinking earlier that Obama is continuing the policies of the first Marxist "president", Eleanor Roosevelt.
 

KJVRICH

New Member
Don't listen to Rush. That being said I stated on this Forum in 2008 that Obama meant to destroy this country. He has succeeded!

you are correct!!!
Obama is anti-Christian and anti-American, he is a racist and an Islamic sympathizer.....in short ....Obama is a disgrace !
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
General Mung Beans

I will not attempt to respond to your cut and paste "collectivist" diatribe. You are incorrect in most of what you post. Actually only 5 Southern states voted for Goldwater. South Carolina was one of them. I was at a Republican dinner when Strom announced his switch to the Republican Party.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Perhaps because people were tired of a pointless war in Iraq? Perhaps because there was an economic crisis that was the worst since the Great Depression? But no, let's just chalk it up to blacks voting for Obama cause he was black.

Obama extended the Bush Recession into the Obama Depression by following the same policies of FDR, spending money. FDR extended the Hoover recession, which was essentially world wide, into the Roosevelt depression for 8 years until he started the draft in 1940 and got us involved in WWII by the travesty of Pearl Harbor, much as LBJ did with the Gulf of Tonkin incident and Viet Nam.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Perhaps because people were tired of a pointless war in Iraq? Perhaps because there was an economic crisis that was the worst since the Great Depression? But no, let's just chalk it up to blacks voting for Obama cause he was black.

Actually Obama is only half black; that is unless he has continued his endless penchant for lying.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
..... that the man in the WH is trying to make us a "Third-world country?" world country?" If this is the fact, then those coming over the border like a human tsunami, will really find themselves at home here, it won't be much different than what they are leaving behind, except, the wages will be much better, and far more advantage to send home to their loved ones, while "Once" hard-working Americans sit back and collect welfare, because there are no longer well-paying jobs!

If you want to make this country a 3rd world country you import 3rd world mentality.
 
If you want to make this country a 3rd world country you import 3rd world mentality.
You mean ...

... perhaps making it clear to third-world parents that, if their kids could find a way to get to the U.S. border, they'd take them in and give them a better life?

Who would do that?

[/sarcasm]

:laugh: :tonofbricks: :BangHead: :thumbsup:
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I tend to agree. There have been some great democrats; Walter George and Richard Russell of Georgia, Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, "Scoop" Jackson of Washington state. And there are others.

I disagreed with some of the policies of Truman but he must be given credit for making the one of the toughest decisions ever, dropping the atomic bomb on Japan. That decision saved perhaps millions of lives, both American and Japanese. My brother was in the 32nd Division in the Philippines campaign and slated to be in the invasion of Japan if necessary.If my memory is correct he was kept in the dark about the nuclear program until Roosevelt died.

JFK had a problem similar to that of Clinton but was a commendable president. he was wrong on the Bay of Pigs but reestablished himself in the Missile Crisis. His move to cut taxes was a master stroke as time has shown.

LBJ was simply not tough enough to be president and I believe he recognized that. His "Great Society" has resulted in a substantial part of the national debt!

Was thinking earlier that Obama is continuing the policies of the first Marxist "president", Eleanor Roosevelt.

You are correct but a little too nice to the Democrats. FDR ruined the American farmer. Once Truman wrote that a weak President follows a strong President, suggesting that Ike was weak. Republicans were quick to point out that Truman followed FDR. Truman used Taft-Hartley to stop rail strikes and he advocated socialized medicine. He did not want to win the Korean War.

It is a pity that Bob Taft was not elected in 1952, although he died in 1953.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
It was revealed yesterday that Iraq requested Obama to use drones to take out the ISIS leaders in western Iraq a year ago. Obama refused and now ISIS controls about one third of Iraq, has declared an Islamic State, telling Christians in their territory to convert or die. The Christian community in Iraq has existed for almost 2000 years and is on the way to extinction.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It was revealed yesterday that Iraq requested Obama to use drones to take out the ISIS leaders in western Iraq a year ago. Obama refused and now ISIS controls about one third of Iraq, has declared an Islamic State, telling Christians in their territory to convert or die. The Christian community in Iraq has existed for almost 2000 years and is on the way to extinction.

The new holocaust, as you know, is against Christians. Iraq is Obama's fault since he refused to leave a residual force. It is now under the thumb of Iran.

Even Democrats do not defend Obama as a great Democrat. Yet they are poised to nominate Hillary who is even more radical than BHO II.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
You are correct but a little too nice to the Democrats. FDR ruined the American farmer. Once Truman wrote that a weak President follows a strong President, suggesting that Ike was weak. Republicans were quick to point out that Truman followed FDR. Truman used Taft-Hartley to stop rail strikes and he advocated socialized medicine. He did not want to win the Korean War.
You make some good points. I have noted that Eleanor was the de facto president in the FDR administration. The US was in recession in 1950; I know! I finished HS in 1949. I have always believed Truman invited the North Korean invasion of the South.
As late as January of 1950, Secretary of State Dean Acheson had implied that the Korea Peninsula lay outside the all-important "defense perimeter" of the United States, a statement that some took to mean that the United States would not defend the ROK from communist attack.
http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/korean-conflict/

It is a pity that Bob Taft was not elected in 1952, although he died in 1953.
I agree! My first vote for a Republican for president was in 1952! If I am not mistaken Taft was shafted by the liberal Republicans much like Goldwater.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
The new holocaust, as you know, is against Christians. Iraq is Obama's fault since he refused to leave a residual force. It is now under the thumb of Iran.

Even Democrats do not defend Obama as a great Democrat. Yet they are poised to nominate Hillary who is even more radical than BHO II.

Please note that the OP does not say Obama was a great president, just that he is most successful in implementing his policy of fundamentally destroying this country.
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The new holocaust, as you know, is against Christians. Iraq is Obama's fault since he refused to leave a residual force. It is now under the thumb of Iran.

Even Democrats do not defend Obama as a great Democrat. Yet they are poised to nominate Hillary who is even more radical than BHO II.

Because they are a party of wishful thinking, not reality. The only reality they know is that if they keep giving Other People's money to some, they will continue to be re-elected faithfully.
Nothing else matters (to them) as long as they are in control.:mad::mad::mad:
 
Top