I was hoping you'd deduct Jesus' Reign of a thousand years on Earth from whatever End Times System of Interpretation you have, to see what you make of things then, but you say it's in the Bible, even though it's not in the Bible?
I know Earth is not mentioned in Revelation 20:4.
So, there is not thousand year Reign on Earth mentioned there.
And 'saints' aren't mentioned in Revelation 20:4.
So, there no thousand year Reign of the saints mentioned there.
But, you think a thousand year Reign of Christ from His Throne in Jerusalem with the saints
is taught somewhere in the Bible?
The Thousand-Year-Reign of Christ is taught in the Bible.
Yep, it is, however, the O.P. talks about that Thousand-Year-Reign of Christ as being, "The Thousand Year Reign of Christ on the Earth."
Christ reigns in Heaven now. He will reign on the Earth with a rod of iron to discipline the nations during the Millennial Reign.
And I suppose we could say that your religion allows what you said there, as if "He will on Earth...during the Millenial Reign, but what is it about those words, "The Millennial Reign", could it be possible that you have just attributed to that expression, "The Millennial Reign", when they are your religion you do believe, even though there is nothing in the Bible that teaches or supports any idea having to do with Jesus Reigning on Earth, in the Future?, at all,
much less that Jesus will ever Reign on Earth for a Thousand Years, just because somebody came up with a concept like that and called their notion they had come up with by those often repeated words, "THE!!! Millennial Reign"!!!???
They are just words though. And, with them nowhere else to be found, but just in some words somebody started using, they aren't 'alive' and hard at all to set aside, a sec.
We could take another look at them and give them another go, just in case God has tons of fresh new Revelation, so to speak, that He might want to Bless us with.
Why would He possibly want us to miss out on SO MANY MORE RICH ENORMOUS BLESSINGS THAT ARE RIGHT THERE IN HIS WORD, ONCE HE SHOWS US HOW THEY CAN BE UNLOCKED MUCH MORE EASILY THAN BY ONLY HAVING BLIND FAITH?
A verse by verse biblical exposition of Revelation Chapter Twenty. By Tony Warren
www.mountainretreatorg.net
"I am well aware that the 1000 years being symbolical goes contrary to the thinking of a lot of people brought up in the premillennialist traditions, and therefore it is "very hard" for many to turn away from those teachings, but we should be interested in truth, not man's tradition.
"Belief based on scripture is one thing, but indoctrination based on our teachers theories is another. If someone shows me (
by Scripture) where I hold a wrong interpretation, I'd like to think that I will check those verses and gladly change my doctrine, giving thanks to the Lord for his giving me the eyes to see.
"Never will I blindly hold onto doctrine simply because it is what I have been taught.
"For one simple reason.
"I understand that The Holy Spirit is the teacher and I am simply the vessel. I must obey God rather than men. Be true to God rather than be true to my ideas, or my teacher's ideas. Faithfulness, is to God, not theologians. Whosoever is our authority, that is who we serve. Likewise, I would hope that all Christians take that very same philosophy in their study of scripture.
VERSE FOUR.
- "And I saw thrones, and they set upon them, and judgment was given unto them. And I saw the souls of them which were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the Word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither has received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands, and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years".
In verse 4 John tells us that he saw the souls of the martyrs who did not worship the beast, nor receive his mark. First of all, notice that John does "not" say he saw the martyrs, nor does he say that he saw their bodies, or the persons, or he saw souls (
which could be illustrating people).
"He is very specific! He saw the souls "
of" those that were beheaded for the witness of God. The souls of them, nothing more! Again, this is the Spiritual picture that the Lord is giving us.
"First the Messenger of the Covenant comes from heaven and binds Satan that the New Covenant Church can be built, and then John sees the souls of those martyred raised up to reign with Christ on thrones. In other words, they are made kings and Priests unto God after Christ binds Satan.
"If you look at verse 5 you'll see that this (
the souls of these martyrs up on thrones) is called
The First Resurrection.
"It's now a simple matter of Biblical deduction to discover exactly when and what was "The First Resurrection?"
Again, fitting perfectly into place we see that it was at the cross! These Souls were raised up to reign with Christ because of the work at the cross and Christ's resurrection thereafter. Christ is the "First" Resurrection. Those who have part in the first resurrection are all the True Believers who have part in Christ's First Resurrection.
"They are the First Resurrection (
the second being at Christ's return). Those who have died in Christ have gone to be with the Lord, having been raised with Christ to reign. That's the First Resurrection these martyrs have part in, which precludes the second death.
"The very fact a first resurrection is spoken about, indicates that there is a second.
"And the second resurrection is at Christ's return.
"This is at the time of the Rapture when when the rest of the dead will be raised to stand for Judgment.
"And then there will be the second death, of which those who have part in the First Resurrection (
raised with Christ) have no need to worry about. Likewise, the very fact that a second death is spoken about, implies that there is a first death.
Romans 5:12-14
- "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
- (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
- Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come."
"The first death is our death in Adam. For in him we are all dead in tresspass and sin. As God told Adam, "
but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." And in Adam, we all die, which means that we are all dead in trespass and sin. This is that first death.
1st Corinthians 15:21-22
- "For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.
- For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive."
"Did Adam die when he ate of the tree? Yes, but not physically, he died spiritually.
"Therefore the first resurrection from the dead is not physical, but spiritual.
"It is in Christ, the firstfruit. And we shall 'realize' that eternal life resurrection at his coming.
"Do not be confused by this First and Second Resurrection, and the First and Second Death.
"This is the way the Lord writes things that His sheep 'alone' will receive it.
"Just as in the parables He told. If we look at these verses carefully and objectively, we can see that the thousand years are not literal. These souls are those of the martyrs in heaven. It says these are those beheaded because of the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and are those who didn't receive the mark of the beast in their foreheads (sign of bondage to satan).
"And we read the rest of the dead lived not again for 1000 years (verse 5). This also illustrates that this is not speaking about a future first resurrection, for there is one future resurrection of the just and the unjust. And it is not (nor can it be) the first. If this were indeed a literal number of years, then even all of the "rest of those who died" would have all had to die on the same year. Else they could not have died and not lived again for that literal thousand years. Did everybody (
the rest of the dead) all die the same year? ..see how convoluted this gets?
Con't;