Steadfast Fred
Active Member
I have a book in my collection, Stewardship Among Baptists, written by Albert S. Vail in 1913.
On page 53, Vail writes:
But the chief thing to be said is that they left it
out because they did not regard it as having any
place in the Christian system. They stood in their
liberty of the gospel and aside from the law. It
would not be true to say that all Baptists ever have
been thoroughly consistent in their understanding of
their liberty in relation to Old Testament law ; but
they have approximated it, and they were clear
enough all along the line in earlier times to enable
them to ignore the whole tithing scheme as applicable to
themselves.
That was 100 years ago. And Vail said the Baptists ignored the tithing scheme as being applicable to themselves. Baptists knew then that it was Old Testament Law and had nothing to do with the post-cross Christianity.
On page 53, Vail writes:
But the chief thing to be said is that they left it
out because they did not regard it as having any
place in the Christian system. They stood in their
liberty of the gospel and aside from the law. It
would not be true to say that all Baptists ever have
been thoroughly consistent in their understanding of
their liberty in relation to Old Testament law ; but
they have approximated it, and they were clear
enough all along the line in earlier times to enable
them to ignore the whole tithing scheme as applicable to
themselves.
That was 100 years ago. And Vail said the Baptists ignored the tithing scheme as being applicable to themselves. Baptists knew then that it was Old Testament Law and had nothing to do with the post-cross Christianity.
Last edited by a moderator: